smitty Posted November 29, 2014 Report Share Posted November 29, 2014 The National Guard was called and ready. But never deployed to stop what everyone knew was going to take place. The question is why? I even heard the Lt Governor was wondering why the Governor wasn't deploying them. Thoughts? http://www.wnd.com/2014/11/limbaugh-did-obama-halt-national-guard-in-ferguson/ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SKINS Posted November 29, 2014 Report Share Posted November 29, 2014 Obama has no authority over the National Guard so no. Blame falls solely on the Governor. Mr. Buddy Garrity 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
77 Posted November 29, 2014 Report Share Posted November 29, 2014 You think he cant apply pressure on the Governor you better think again! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
smitty Posted November 30, 2014 Author Report Share Posted November 30, 2014 You think he cant apply pressure on the Governor you better think again! True. There's speculation that the democratic Governor was pressured by obama for one of two reasons. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
baddog Posted November 30, 2014 Report Share Posted November 30, 2014 Lots of angry shop owners, including black business people. They should bill the governor for their losses, then Obama, if this is indeed what happened. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
5GallonBucket Posted December 1, 2014 Report Share Posted December 1, 2014 business owners......2nd amendment. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LumRaiderFan Posted December 1, 2014 Report Share Posted December 1, 2014 There was no problem bringing the full force of the fed gov down on Cliven Bundy but for some reason can't intervene to save businesses from being destroyed by thugs. Englebert 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
westend1 Posted December 2, 2014 Report Share Posted December 2, 2014 So, you don't want the National Guard. You want ATF involved? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LumRaiderFan Posted December 2, 2014 Report Share Posted December 2, 2014 So, you don't want the National Guard. You want ATF involved? I'm sure you understand my point. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
westend1 Posted December 2, 2014 Report Share Posted December 2, 2014 Honestly, I'm not sure you understand your point. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LumRaiderFan Posted December 2, 2014 Report Share Posted December 2, 2014 Honestly, I'm not sure you understand your point. Sorry you missed it...I'm not very fluent in liberal. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
westend1 Posted December 2, 2014 Report Share Posted December 2, 2014 Your not too fluent in anything, apparently. But go ahead and try to explain what you were trying to say about the national guard and it's relationship to Bundy. new tobie 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LumRaiderFan Posted December 2, 2014 Report Share Posted December 2, 2014 Your not too fluent in anything, apparently. But go ahead and try to explain what you were trying to say about the national guard and it's relationship to Bundy. Didn't say the national guard had any relationship with Bundy...I said the response from the "fed gov". You do realize the fed gov has several departments, right. Go back and read the post again...if you still don't get it, oh well. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
westend1 Posted December 2, 2014 Report Share Posted December 2, 2014 So which department did you want to see in Ferguson? Specifics please? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LumRaiderFan Posted December 2, 2014 Report Share Posted December 2, 2014 So which department did you want to see in Ferguson? Specifics please? The national guard...now answer my question...why no forceful response to the looting? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
westend1 Posted December 2, 2014 Report Share Posted December 2, 2014 Ask the governor or the sheriff. Just don't be a dumb arse. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LumRaiderFan Posted December 2, 2014 Report Share Posted December 2, 2014 Ask the governor or the sheriff. Just don't be a dumb arse. LOL...as always, a very mature debate. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
5GallonBucket Posted December 2, 2014 Report Share Posted December 2, 2014 don't waste your time Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CraigS Posted December 2, 2014 Report Share Posted December 2, 2014 The national guard...now answer my question...why no forceful response to the looting? Because cow farts contribute to global warming - a much more grave danger to our entire nation...Ferguson only affected a single town...my best attempt at liberal talk! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
westend1 Posted December 3, 2014 Report Share Posted December 3, 2014 LOL I am mature enough to know who I should be complaining about if the national guard should have been called out. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TROJANSWIN Posted December 3, 2014 Report Share Posted December 3, 2014 Either way, you are both wasting your time. You will never agree, and no one will ever prove Obama had anything to do with it. Even if he did, his stoolies will take the fall and he will stay clean. Watch any Chicago gangster movie, the boss is never the trigger man and is always somewhere else with a bunch of witnesses to say he didn't do it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
new tobie Posted December 6, 2014 Report Share Posted December 6, 2014 Either way, you are both wasting your time. You will never agree, and no one will ever prove Obama had anything to do with it. Even if he did, his stoolies will take the fall and he will stay clean. Watch any Chicago gangster movie, the boss is never the trigger man and is always somewhere else with a bunch of witnesses to say he didn't do it. Better watch out, your next president was born in Chicago! Mr. Buddy Garrity 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
westend1 Posted December 6, 2014 Report Share Posted December 6, 2014 Tell me how Obama affected the national guard non response. Did he threaten to withhold funding? You don't think the governor would have that all over the news? . Mr. Buddy Garrity 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TROJANSWIN Posted December 6, 2014 Report Share Posted December 6, 2014 Does it really matter where they were born at this point? If they are nominated by the democrats or republicans they will be out to screw the rest of the country. Neither party will allow an honest candidate who will follow the constitution and choose the country over their party! Mr. Buddy Garrity 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TROJANSWIN Posted December 6, 2014 Report Share Posted December 6, 2014 Tell me how Obama affected the national guard non response. Did he threaten to withhold funding? You don't think the governor would have that all over the news? . The governor of Missouri is a democrat stooge. Just like the lieutenant governor is a republican stooge. No, he would not give up that Obama called the plays, and the republican will blame Obama no matter what. Both parties are playing us for fools. They keep us arguing with each other so we don't pay attention to what they are doing. They have successfully split the country and working together to keep it that way. Mr. Buddy Garrity 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.