Jump to content

Solution To obamacare?!


smitty

Recommended Posts

http://m.military.com/daily-news/2015/01/28/pentagon-tells-congress-to-stop-buying-equipment-it-doesnt-need.html

Hopefully military.com is a reliable news source.

Link? I've honestly never heard that.
 
I would think if I was going to fight a war, I would never tell anyone I've got enough.....
 
I also think even if we don't "need" a huge miilitary, having one prevents atttempts to fight on our soil.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Yes.....good link....

 

I think the article was mainly about letting the miliatry, not congress determine what is needed and the tanks were one example.....

 

I don't disagree with that, but that money should be redirected to upgrade our military....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The ACA is not a health insurance. It is a list of mandates that private insurance companies have to follow. Blue cross/blue shield, Humana etc participate on the exchange. There are a lot of docs that dont accept.my insurance m health soooooo I.just find a doc that does. It is very simple.. mhealth is offered through my husband's employer
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The ACA is not a health insurance. It is a list of mandates that private insurance companies have to follow. Blue cross/blue shield, Humana etc participate on the exchange. There are a lot of docs that dont accept.my insurance m health soooooo I.just find a doc that does. It is very simple.. mhealth is offered through my husband's employer

"It is a list of mandates that private insurance companies have to follow"  This is the problem.  Where in the Constitution does it allow for this?  I've been looking again at the 10th Amendment.  I can't find it in there.  BigGirl -- you might want to read the 10th Amendment and get back with this forum and tell us what you've read.    ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"It is a list of mandates that private insurance companies have to follow"  This is the problem.  Where in the Constitution does it allow for this?  I've been looking again at the 10th Amendment.  I can't find it in there.  BigGirl -- you might want to read the 10th Amendment and get back with this forum and tell us what you've read.    ;)

You won't find anywhere in The Constitution where the government is authorized to do this........BigGirl doesn't appear to me from previous posts to be one who gives a rats ass  WHAT The Constitution has to say......just like all of her fascist liberals in power.....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Member Statistics

    46,206
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    Ceb2000
    Newest Member
    Ceb2000
    Joined



  • Posts

    • Like I said, even if it’s only 10% of the 100 kids BHISD takes from GCCISD each year, that’s 10 athletes per year and that’s being generous.  You’re right about the jobs with BHISD, BTW.  There’s more than 1 athlete from Baytown originally who got transferred to BHISD after a job opened up for Mama.
    • Here’s a link to another story about it This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up
    • It’s behind a paywall but here’s Baytown Sun’s story on it.  It was reported on in other papers statewide so if you search by the date I think you’ll find other stories on it. UIL strengthens student transfer rules By Ron McDowell [email protected] Oct 18, 2024   In order to maintain a level playing field for all member schools, the University Interscholastic League strengthened rules regarding transfer student eligibility at its most recent meeting in Austin. Every year thousands of students transfer schools in the state of Texas. A student’s ability to participate in UIL sanctioned activities may be limited base on the reasons for the transfer. A change in family status, work transfers, enrollment in an academic magnet program, or a move across town, receive scrutiny, but only rarely does one of these reasons result in the loss of eligibility. The only reason to automatically cause the loss of participation eligibility is a transfer for athletic purposes. The current rule, which has been in place since 1981, does not require a Previous Athletic Participation Form (PAPFs) to be submitted if the student-athlete does not participate in a varsity level sport during the first year of enrollment. There has been growing concern among some member schools, that other members are breaking the current rule and creating “super teams” with new transfer enrollees, and that the UIL is not doing enough to police, what appear to be, the inordinate number of transfers among high school athletes. To mitigate these concerns, the UIL approved a proposal to expand the power of the State Executive Committee (SEC) and allow it to investigate schools based upon the number of PAPFs submitted. Schools that submit an inordinate number of PAPFs would face heightened scrutiny and possible public reprimand and future sanctions. The UIL has also changed the requirements for PAPF submission, mandating that the form be submitted before a grade 9-12 transfer student may participate at any level of school athletics. This is a marked departure from the current policy which encourages schools not to complete PAPFs for students who transfer in, if the school believes that the student will not play a varsity sport in the first year the student is enrolled at the new school. Some critics of the current system think that the change doesn’t go far enough. Speaking on background, one local school district source suggested that there should be an automatic year wait for transfer students due to the number of loopholes in the waiver process. “If a student transfers, it should be a year out of competition automatically,” the source said. In addition, the UIL also approved a proposal that gives the SEC the power to appoint an independent administrator to oversee the conduct of the local District Executive Committee (DEC) if it is determined that the DEC is not consistently enforcing the rules of the governing body. The change is significant since all appeals that a school brings, starts and usually ends with the DEC. That includes the determination of transfer student eligibility. It is believed that with the implementation of this change, schools in a UIL district will be less likely to face retribution from the DEC chair and other members. The policy changes will go into effect, Aug. 1, 2025 This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up  
    • I was hoping WOS was going to win. To get another chance to redeem ourself. Silsbee did not look good in that game and has not played consistent during the season. Hopefully against La Vega they will play 4quarters of football
    • This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up   GCCISD paid a firm called PASA to compile this report ahead of them closing/consolidating some schools and redrawing attendance zones.
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...