Jump to content

Tod Stark hired as Hardin AD/Head Football Coach


Guest MTJ

Recommended Posts

Alright I just heard the official word. Bill Bellichick is out at New England..for unknown reasons. But..he has agreed to come to Hardin, Tx under the following conditions:

1. Meet 1/3 his current salary
2. Tom Brady gets to breed all 16-25 aged women
3. He gets to personally air up all game balls

I know it's a stretch...but I see a powerhouse in the making.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Alright I just heard the official word. Bill Bellichick is out at New England..for unknown reasons. But..he has agreed to come to Hardin, Tx under the following conditions:

1. Meet 1/3 his current salary
2. Tom Brady gets to breed all 16-25 aged women
3. He gets to personally air up all game balls

I know it's a stretch...but I see a powerhouse in the making.

Yup! 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How do you mean?

 

People around the school...administration/teachers...were ready for him to go. Otherwise, he would still be there.  If you'll remember, he left and didn't coach for a year.  It's not like he left for another job.  He left because there were issues.  I'd be shocked if Haynes returns.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Two Bi-District Titles in his tenure right?

2007 Season was a banner year as well. I believe he had a QB and WR All-State and They lost to powerhouse Crawford in the area round as well.

One of those "Bi-District Titles" was against the always tough Bye HS. The other is the only playoff win ever.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Haynes left because there was a budget crunch and he resigned so they could hire someone who they could pay less. So they could lay off less employees, I wouldn't call that wearing out your welcome. I'd call that strong character and caring about others more than yourself.


Riiiiggght. Ok. Rose colored glasses. He tell u that?
Link to comment
Share on other sites

No, i know that because a board member told me that. He said they had a meeting with Haynes and since he was eligible to receive retirement and continue getting paid he would resign. because of that 1 employee didn't have to be laid off cause it saved the district over 25,000, it's a fact go look at the two salaries big boy. That was the year of the state budget crisis when houston isd laid off hundreds of employess all surrounding schools had huge lay offs, Hardin had very little. he directly allowed a school teacher to keep their job insteads of being selfish and demanding they pay him through the remainder of his contract. He had two years left on his contract when he resigned at 80,000+ so he walked away from over $100,000 to help other employees. So be careful before you say the guy wasnt liked.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No, i know that because a board member told me that. He said they had a meeting with Haynes and since he was eligible to receive retirement and continue getting paid he would resign. because of that 1 employee didn't have to be laid off cause it saved the district over 25,000, it's a fact go look at the two salaries big boy. That was the year of the state budget crisis when houston isd laid off hundreds of employess all surrounding schools had huge lay offs, Hardin had very little. he directly allowed a school teacher to keep their job insteads of being selfish and demanding they pay him through the remainder of his contract. He had two years left on his contract when he resigned at 80,000+ so he walked away from over $100,000 to help other employees. So be careful before you say the guy wasnt liked.

 

There was at least one newspaper article that supports the details of what Highpoint is saying.  Don't remember the paper but it was written around the time that Haynes retired from Hardin.  I remember reading the article.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They were considering hiring the janitor from Billy Madison, but in his interview, he reminded them too much of the typical every day male one would see roaming through Daisetta. So, in turn they went with the guy who promised to never lose to the Mighty HD Bobcats ever again. It's a must read article.

Said: Nobody
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Member Statistics

    46,201
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    JBarry68
    Newest Member
    JBarry68
    Joined



  • Posts

    • Very close game until the 2nd half (mostly the 4th) when Orangefield came unraveled. Worse defensive effort I have seen out of the Bobcats in three years. This team has to get back on D and quit getting beat over the top when pressing. Offensively, non ball handlers continually turn it over and their shot selection is poor. Basic basketball, such as: defensive hustle, boxing out, and taking care of the basketball are the areas the Bobcats need to work on most. Whitmire will get them on point, but he shouldn't have to coach effort at the Varsity Level.  We'll be at McnNeese this Friday night at 6pm.
    • I don’t benefit from it, that’s not my area.  But the average cost to imprison someone is around $15k per year (on average in the US) and capital cases cost somewhere between $1.5-$3M with over half being overturned or reduced to life in prison anyway.  These numbers may be inflated since the last report I read but I’m sure it would be on both sides and higher on the DP side if anything. So what’s the point?  We feel better because we got to return the favor on someone (hopefully) who committed a heinous crime?  And I don’t know I can say we have “complicated” it. Which appeal should we cut out?  Our justice system has a pecking order and we have higher courts for a reason. When we are about to impose the ultimate judgment, should we cut steps that other cases have to save a buck?  Or do we not pay for an indigent person’s experts at the trial court level because it’s too expensive? Or do we just lock them up and throw away the key (unless we later find out they weren’t actually guilty, in which case we have a key and a life we haven’t unjustly ended) and save a ton of money?  Seems to me to be an easy and obvious solution but I’m more of a pragmatist.
    • 1 thing for certain. Coach Earned 3 more years to figure it out lol
    • @CIS_org National Security Senior Fellow @BensmanTodd tells Steve Bannon how the U.S. State Department and USAID have been sending American taxpayer funds to religious nonprofits to facilitate mass immigration to our southern border. Bensman says 248 nonprofits are participating in the United Nations’ 2024 agenda to distribute $1.6 billion in cash, transportation, food, and shelter to U.S.-bound immigrants across Mexico and Latin America.
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...