Jump to content

Question For The Great Intellectuals On This Board


EnlightenedMessiah

Recommended Posts

I read again and again how Obama is a socialist who takes from the rich and gives to everyone else.

 

Based off verifiable data found virtually everywhere, any competant person can see that the rich have gotten considerably richer with inequality reaching decade highs.

 

Great intellectuals of setxsports.com (Looking at you smitty), can you explain how Obama is a socialist given the current wealtth inequality in this country?

 

Thanks

 

- EnlightenedMessiah

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

PS - Stevenash, I'm waiting for you to address my question about the diverisification benefits of hedge funds and other alternative assets in traditional stock and bond portfolios. You are a super sophisticated financial planning cold caller, so this shouldn't be an issue for you. Please PM me when you get a chance.

 

Thanks

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I read again and again how Obama is a socialist who takes from the rich and gives to everyone else.

 

Based off verifiable data found virtually everywhere, any competant person can see that the rich have gotten considerably richer with inequality reaching decade highs.

 

Great intellectuals of setxsports.com (Looking at you smitty), can you explain how Obama is a socialist given the current wealtth inequality in this country?

 

Thanks

 

- EnlightenedMessiah

Round one of proof that obama IS a socialist.

 

http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/more-proof-that-obama-is-a-socialist/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I read again and again how Obama is a socialist who takes from the rich and gives to everyone else.

Based off verifiable data found virtually everywhere, any competant person can see that the rich have gotten considerably richer with inequality reaching decade highs.

Great intellectuals of setxsports.com (Looking at you smitty), can you explain how Obama is a socialist given the current wealtth inequality in this country?

Thanks

- EnlightenedMessiah


Your question has a false assumption and/or a straw man argument.

The rich have always gotten richer and it is because of the free market, not Obama.

The flaw/straw man argument is too easy to dispell. You say that we claim Obama is a socialist that wants to take from the rich and give to the poor. Well that is exactly what has and wants to do. The Republicans compromised with the Dems in 2013 and raised the top rate by almost 5%.

Now he has come back and asked for yet another tax increase on the rich.

They is no claim or accusation that Obama is taking from the rich and giving to the poor, it is a fact.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Your question has a false assumption and/or a straw man argument.

The rich have always gotten richer and it is because of the free market, not Obama.

The flaw/straw man argument is too easy to dispell. You say that we claim Obama is a socialist that wants to take from the rich and give to the poor. Well that is exactly what has and wants to do. The Republicans compromised with the Dems in 2013 and raised the top rate by almost 5%.

Now he has come back and asked for yet another tax increase on the rich.

They is no claim or accusation that Obama is taking from the rich and giving to the poor, it is a fact.

that is a lie and you know it. Smh
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I read again and again how Obama is a socialist who takes from the rich and gives to everyone else.
 
Based off verifiable data found virtually everywhere, any competant person can see that the rich have gotten considerably richer with inequality reaching decade highs.
 
Great intellectuals of setxsports.com (Looking at you smitty), can you explain how Obama is a socialist given the current wealtth inequality in this country?
 
Thanks
 
- EnlightenedMessiah


Before one questions or degrades the competence of others, one who portrays himself as above all others really ought to learn that competent is not spelled c-o-m-p-e-t-A-n t. And nobody is going to accept the excuse of "I'm using my phone key pad" or "I was in a hurry and missed a key". People of such superior knowledge simply do not make spelling and/or grammatical errors, particularly when they are condescending to everyone else.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

You still dodge my questions regarding diversification benefits of alternative investments

Yawn

Pick up the phone and get back to dialing

Before one questions or degrades the competence of others, one who portrays himself as above all others really ought to learn that competent is not spelled c-o-m-p-e-t-A-n t. And nobody is going to accept the excuse of "I'm using my phone key pad" or "I was in a hurry and missed a key". People of such superior knowledge simply do not make spelling and/or grammatical errors, particularly when they are condescending to everyone else.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nothing to dodge. I very well understand the benefits of diversification.  My complaint about hedge funds was more associated with the relative high cost compared to other invesments.  There are many ways to blend non correlated assets into a portfolio other than using hedge funds.  If one does his job well, cold calling is not a necessity.  Except for my training school in New York, I never made a cold call.  So, try condescending from some other position. You probably also ought to omit spelling and grammar from your condescenscion efforts. 

 

Personal insults still aren't working.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

News flash: Almost all alternative assets have higher costs compared to traditional stock and bond funds.

And please elaborate on how you're doing to "blend" top performing managers in alternative asset classes into a traditional portfolio, without paying 2/20.

Nothing to dodge. I very well understand the benefits of diversification.  My complaint about hedge funds was more associated with the relative high cost compared to other invesments.  There are many ways to blend non correlated assets into a portfolio other than using hedge funds.  If one does his job well, cold calling is not a necessity.  Except for my training school in New York, I never made a cold call.  So, try condescending from some other position. You probably also ought to omit spelling and grammar from your condescenscion efforts. 
 
Personal insults still aren't working.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

News flash- There are hundreds of funds( mutual, not hedge) and structured products that provide as much exposure as one wants  in non correlated assets.  Stop trying to position yourself as somebody who has superior knowledge of market behavior.  Everyone has an opinion and/or strategy and they apply it as they see fit.  If they dont do their job well, they wont be in the business very long.  Heres one more newsflash for you.  " Top performing" managers often dont maintain that status for long periods of time. Therefore, a backward looking approach in hiring someone is often times less productive than a forward looking one.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Member Statistics

    46,202
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    CHSFalcon
    Newest Member
    CHSFalcon
    Joined
×
×
  • Create New...