EnlightenedMessiah Posted February 3, 2015 Report Posted February 3, 2015 This should be an interesting topic, seeing that conservatives aren't the most scientifically inclined.
smitty Posted February 3, 2015 Report Posted February 3, 2015 This should be an interesting topic, seeing that conservatives aren't the most scientifically inclined. Do I believe that the Earth has come out of a freeze from 5000 years ago, then yes, the Earth has warmed. Now, do I believe that the earth is now in a cooling phase, then the answer is yes. Now, do I think it's headed back to the freeze phase it was 5000 years ago, well, not sure...
EnlightenedMessiah Posted February 3, 2015 Author Report Posted February 3, 2015 You think the Earth is currently cooling? Do you, by chance, get your news from Fox News? Genuinely curiousDo I believe that the Earth has come out of a freeze from 5000 years ago, then yes, the Earth has warmed. Now, do I believe that the earth is now in a cooling phase, then the answer is yes. Now, do I think it's headed back to the freeze phase it was 5000 years ago, well, not sure...
EnlightenedMessiah Posted February 3, 2015 Author Report Posted February 3, 2015 Can you answer the question first?Does that include you?
stevenash Posted February 3, 2015 Report Posted February 3, 2015 One would need to properly characterize the term global warming for me to offer an opinion. Aren't you guilty of a broad generalization by suggesting/inferring that if one is a Republican, one has insufficient understanding/knowledge of science?
EnlightenedMessiah Posted February 3, 2015 Author Report Posted February 3, 2015 Sorry that your brain doesn't have the intellectual capacity to figure it outOne would need to properly characterize the term global warming for me to offer an opinion.
stevenash Posted February 3, 2015 Report Posted February 3, 2015 Thats why I am just another board poster trying to learn from one who is enlightened. If the temperature is rising 1/10th of 1% per year, will we call that global warming or if it is rising 1% per year, will we call that global warming? What if it rises for two years and then drops for two years, will we call that global warming?
stevenash Posted February 3, 2015 Report Posted February 3, 2015 You really need to brush up on your condescension tactics. They really aren't up to speed considering your enlightenment level. dayton and jv_coach 2
EnlightenedMessiah Posted February 3, 2015 Author Report Posted February 3, 2015 I'll be generous and let you use your own definition of global warming. Just be sure to state your definition of global warming in your answer.Thats why I am just another board poster trying to learn from one who is enlightened. If the temperature is rising 1/10th of 1% per year, will we call that global warming or if it is rising 1% per year, will we call that global warming? What if it rises for two years and then drops for two years, will we call that global warming?
stevenash Posted February 3, 2015 Report Posted February 3, 2015 It would seem to me that there is, to some degree, climate change. At the same time, I do not believe it is as serious as many seem to portray it.
EnlightenedMessiah Posted February 3, 2015 Author Report Posted February 3, 2015 Stevenash admitted global warming is real. The end must be near guys. Stock up on ammo, food and bibles.It would seem to me that there is, to some degree, climate change. At the same time, I do not believe it is as serious as many seem to portray it.
stevenash Posted February 3, 2015 Report Posted February 3, 2015 I also believe there is, to a degree, racism in this country- however, it is practiced by all races.
EnlightenedMessiah Posted February 3, 2015 Author Report Posted February 3, 2015 You're trying to catch me in a trap, when I actually agree with you. You see, as an enlightened individual, I agree with conservatives on certain issues while agreeing with liberals on other issues. Go ahead and attach a questionnaire that I can fill out. I know it's coming. I also believe there is, to a degree, racism in this country- however, it is practiced by all races.
stevenash Posted February 3, 2015 Report Posted February 3, 2015 No, you are simply assuming that I am trying to catch you in a trap. You make a number of broad assumptions/generalizations that are not correct ( as in Republicans aren't scientifically inclined) The statement that you sometimes agree with conservatives and sometimes agree with liberals is your effort to convince the rest of this board that you are somehow, more objective, more broad minded, and, of course, more enlightened than the rest of us. Essentially, you can't understand why everyone doesn't see things from your viewpoint because you believe your methods of arriving at your viewpoint are superior to the methods used by others - or, more importantly, your ASSUMPTION of the methods used by others. In another post, you made mention of your perception that every President of this country was a socialist because they presided over tax hikes that theoretically were made to assist the poor. Here is a shocker for you- you can be conservative and anti socialism and still want to help the poor.
LumRaiderFan Posted February 3, 2015 Report Posted February 3, 2015 No, you are simply assuming that I am trying to catch you in a trap. You make a number of broad assumptions/generalizations that are not correct ( as in Republicans aren't scientifically inclined) The statement that you sometimes agree with conservatives and sometimes agree with liberals is your effort to convince the rest of this board that you are somehow, more objective, more broad minded, and, of course, more enlightened than the rest of us. Essentially, you can't understand why everyone doesn't see things from your viewpoint because you believe your methods of arriving at your viewpoint are superior to the methods used by others - or, more importantly, your ASSUMPTION of the methods used by others. In another post, you made mention of your perception that every President of this country was a socialist because they presided over tax hikes that theoretically were made to assist the poor. Here is a shocker for you- you can be conservative and anti socialism and still want to help the poor. Exactly right...it's called charity, and it doesn't require the confiscation of funds to achieve. jv_coach 1
EnlightenedMessiah Posted February 3, 2015 Author Report Posted February 3, 2015 You thought my post about all presidents being socialists was serious? You are not a smart man. No, you are simply assuming that I am trying to catch you in a trap. You make a number of broad assumptions/generalizations that are not correct ( as in Republicans aren't scientifically inclined) The statement that you sometimes agree with conservatives and sometimes agree with liberals is your effort to convince the rest of this board that you are somehow, more objective, more broad minded, and, of course, more enlightened than the rest of us. Essentially, you can't understand why everyone doesn't see things from your viewpoint because you believe your methods of arriving at your viewpoint are superior to the methods used by others - or, more importantly, your ASSUMPTION of the methods used by others. In another post, you made mention of your perception that every President of this country was a socialist because they presided over tax hikes that theoretically were made to assist the poor. Here is a shocker for you- you can be conservative and anti socialism and still want to help the poor.
EnlightenedMessiah Posted February 3, 2015 Author Report Posted February 3, 2015 It just infuriates Stevenash that I'm fiscally conservative and (usually) socially liberal. His brain can't comprehend it.
stevenash Posted February 3, 2015 Report Posted February 3, 2015 It does not infuriate me. That's the way you want it to be. But it simply isn't. Bullets13 is also a social liberal and mostly a fiscal conservative and he and I have expressed our differences for years without the need to tell/suggest to one another that each is not smart enough or worthy enough to converse.
EnlightenedMessiah Posted February 3, 2015 Author Report Posted February 3, 2015 You have a weird obsession with me and my political views. You come in every single topic and derail it with pointless arguments. I think you're envious that I manage billions of dollars worth of investments (confirmed by bullets13) while you manage retail accounts.
stevenash Posted February 3, 2015 Report Posted February 3, 2015 NCS ( god rest her soul) would be disappointed in your misleading comments.
smitty Posted February 3, 2015 Report Posted February 3, 2015 You think the Earth is currently cooling? Do you, by chance, get your news from Fox News? Genuinely curious Let me understand you first: It appears that you are on the side of global warming. There are two sides to this. Curious which are you: The side that would say, yes, there is global warming and it's due to natural phenomena. The other, would be the AlGore side that says it's man-made global warming.
EnlightenedMessiah Posted February 4, 2015 Author Report Posted February 4, 2015 How do your questions help you understand what I asked? I asked if you really thought the earth was cooling. It's pretty straightforward Mr. Buddy Garrity 1
smitty Posted February 4, 2015 Report Posted February 4, 2015 How do your questions help you understand what I asked? I asked if you really thought the earth was cooling. It's pretty straightforward No where does it appear that I have a question about your question. First of all I DID answer your question. Just curious where you stand on the warming side.
thetragichippy Posted February 4, 2015 Report Posted February 4, 2015 OK guys,,,,, Nash and EM......PM each other if you are going to bicker back and forth about who is smarter than the other and who has a better job.... These are the types of post that put this forum under the microscope last year.... Debate the topic or the thread will be locked. Thanks
Recommended Posts