Jump to content

Oklahoma Republicants Vote To Ban AP History


EnlightenedMessiah

Recommended Posts

Why is it always republicans in southern states doing stupid stuff like this?

First they deny science.. Now they're trying to revise history / brainwash the youth.

http://nymag.com/daily/intelligencer/2015/02/why-oklahoma-lawmakers-want-to-ban-ap-us-history.html

The only "science" being denied by conservatives are the unPROVEN theory of evolution and the unPROVEN theory of global warming....your "scientists" gin up the evidence and expect those of us with just a little bit of intelligence to fall in line with it and eat it up like it was from God on high.....

 

Same with this "history"....from what I've seen of it, they are being indoctrinated with marxist/leninist propaganda and not being taught anything about AMERICA at all......

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Let me guess.. You don't believe in the theory of gravity either?

The only "science" being denied by conservatives are the unPROVEN theory of evolution and the unPROVEN theory of global warming....your "scientists" gin up the evidence and expect those of us with just a little bit of intelligence to fall in line with it and eat it up like it was from God on high.....
 
Same with this "history"....from what I've seen of it, they are being indoctrinated with marxist/leninist propaganda and not being taught anything about AMERICA at all......

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The scientific data goes against your personal ignorant beleifs, therefore it must be "doctored" evidence. Gotcha.
 

wrong as usual.....multiple reports confirm that the "global warming" data has been falsified.......and when you show me a transitional fossil that can stand up to peer review, I'll become an evolutionist.......

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Can you put on your reading glasses?

 

I read it...it's a pathetic article to try and back your statement up...there have got to be many more (and hopefully much better) links to support your case if this is such a prevalent problem.

 

Looks like to me the Libs are trying to skew history in this article...if you are going to post a link, you should really post one that agrees with your point.

 

Now...back to the billions.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yup, just pulled back up to the office. Thanks

I read it...it's a pathetic article to try and back your statement up...there have got to be many more (and hopefully much better) links to support your case if this is such a prevalent problem.
 
Looks like to me the Libs are trying to skew history in this article...if you are going to post a link, you should really post one that agrees with your point.
 
Now...back to the billions.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Some people can't see the END by the means of change. 

 

You have luxuries that most in the world do not and we have these luxuries due to certain foundations that were put in place when the country became its own.  We conservatives fight for these foundations because  1. soldiers shed blood (their own and enemy) to preserve these foundations 2. we know that we live in a very blessed country with the freedoms we have.  3. we know that these luxuries and freedoms we have can be taken away and are being taken away....inch by inch year by year....very slowly.

 

Remember Obama and his change....he wasn't kidding

 

I could keep going but what s the use

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

I read the article. I saw nothing about history revisions. I saw that there was a problem in highlighting certain parts of history over others. I saw neither side that claims the other was teaching false history. 

 

Maybe you need some more enlightenment. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Member Statistics

    46,206
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    Ceb2000
    Newest Member
    Ceb2000
    Joined


  • Posts

    • It’s behind a paywall but here’s Baytown Sun’s story on it.  It was reported on in other papers statewide so if you search by the date I think you’ll find other stories on it. UIL strengthens student transfer rules By Ron McDowell [email protected] Oct 18, 2024   In order to maintain a level playing field for all member schools, the University Interscholastic League strengthened rules regarding transfer student eligibility at its most recent meeting in Austin. Every year thousands of students transfer schools in the state of Texas. A student’s ability to participate in UIL sanctioned activities may be limited base on the reasons for the transfer. A change in family status, work transfers, enrollment in an academic magnet program, or a move across town, receive scrutiny, but only rarely does one of these reasons result in the loss of eligibility. The only reason to automatically cause the loss of participation eligibility is a transfer for athletic purposes. The current rule, which has been in place since 1981, does not require a Previous Athletic Participation Form (PAPFs) to be submitted if the student-athlete does not participate in a varsity level sport during the first year of enrollment. There has been growing concern among some member schools, that other members are breaking the current rule and creating “super teams” with new transfer enrollees, and that the UIL is not doing enough to police, what appear to be, the inordinate number of transfers among high school athletes. To mitigate these concerns, the UIL approved a proposal to expand the power of the State Executive Committee (SEC) and allow it to investigate schools based upon the number of PAPFs submitted. Schools that submit an inordinate number of PAPFs would face heightened scrutiny and possible public reprimand and future sanctions. The UIL has also changed the requirements for PAPF submission, mandating that the form be submitted before a grade 9-12 transfer student may participate at any level of school athletics. This is a marked departure from the current policy which encourages schools not to complete PAPFs for students who transfer in, if the school believes that the student will not play a varsity sport in the first year the student is enrolled at the new school. Some critics of the current system think that the change doesn’t go far enough. Speaking on background, one local school district source suggested that there should be an automatic year wait for transfer students due to the number of loopholes in the waiver process. “If a student transfers, it should be a year out of competition automatically,” the source said. In addition, the UIL also approved a proposal that gives the SEC the power to appoint an independent administrator to oversee the conduct of the local District Executive Committee (DEC) if it is determined that the DEC is not consistently enforcing the rules of the governing body. The change is significant since all appeals that a school brings, starts and usually ends with the DEC. That includes the determination of transfer student eligibility. It is believed that with the implementation of this change, schools in a UIL district will be less likely to face retribution from the DEC chair and other members. The policy changes will go into effect, Aug. 1, 2025 This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up  
    • I was hoping WOS was going to win. To get another chance to redeem ourself. Silsbee did not look good in that game and has not played consistent during the season. Hopefully against La Vega they will play 4quarters of football
    • This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up   GCCISD paid a firm called PASA to compile this report ahead of them closing/consolidating some schools and redrawing attendance zones.
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...