Jump to content

Atheist group threatens suit over 'angels' on memorial to beloved teacher


LumRaiderFan

Recommended Posts

That happens when God is not a part of your life.......


So high school kids holding up "White Power" at a basketball game is cool, but this is not? You were big on the constitutional rights of those high schoolers, so I assume you're also squarely in the corner of these atheists as well?
Link to comment
Share on other sites

So high school kids holding up "White Power" at a basketball game is cool, but this is not? You were big on the constitutional rights of those high schoolers, so I assume you're also squarely in the corner of these atheists as well?

 

 

The first amendment clearly states that the FREE EXERCISE OF RELIGION SHALL NOT BE PROHIBITED......this is a clear prohibition of the free exercise clause of that Amendment.......

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The first amendment clearly states that the FREE EXERCISE OF RELIGION SHALL NOT BE PROHIBITED......this is a clear prohibition of the free exercise clause of that Amendment.......


You've tried to use that argument before when talking about unconstitutional practices performed at schools if I'm not mistaken?
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I do not see how they have a valid challenge. Apparently they have no issue with a memorial, only that religious symbols are on it. I can see where they might want to ban all memorials but it you allow them, then the people that put them up should have the right to express their beliefs. I have seen cases where a teacher tells her students to do an essay on "anything" but then will try to stop a student from speaking of God or Jesus under the belief that it violates the Constitution. I have seen were courts have upheld the student's right to submit such papers because while religion cannot be dictated at a public school, it can also not be banned. 

 

The school is allowing the bench on campus. I did not read where the district was funding it so no public money is involved. If a cross on public property to honor a person is unconstitutional, what are they going to do at Arlington National Cemetery with all the crosses and Star of Davids on the thousands of graves? Those are funded by taxpayer's money. 

 

Some religious issues in schools are unconstitutional in my opinion but I am not sure how this memorial is. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I do not see how they have a valid challenge. Apparently they have no issue with a memorial, only that religious symbols are on it. I can see where they might want to ban all memorials but it you allow them, then the people that put them up should have the right to express their beliefs. I have seen cases where a teacher tells her students to do an essay on "anything" but then will try to stop a student from speaking of God or Jesus under the belief that it violates the Constitution. I have seen were courts have upheld the student's right to submit such papers because while religion cannot be dictated at a public school, it can also not be banned. 

 

The school is allowing the bench on campus. I did not read where the district was funding it so no public money is involved. If a cross on public property to honor a person is unconstitutional, what are they going to do at Arlington National Cemetery with all the crosses and Star of Davids on the thousands of graves? Those are funded by taxpayer's money. 

 

Some religious issues in schools are unconstitutional in my opinion but I am not sure how this memorial is. 

 

Great point

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I didn't try.....I DID use it and stand by it.....what part of the first amendment do you not comprehend???? It's crystal clear to anyone who can read.......


I personally don't have an issue with this memorial, but I feel like I remember you attempting to use the constitution to argue some religious practices that have been ruled unconstitutional over and over again by higher courts. maybe I'm confusing you with someone else.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I personally don't have an issue with this memorial, but I feel like I remember you attempting to use the constitution to argue some religious practices that have been ruled unconstitutional over and over again by higher courts. maybe I'm confusing you with someone else.

 

 

That probably WAS me.....:)...the courts views on religion are  diametrically opposite of what the founders intended......

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Member Statistics

    46,178
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    PostDigTD1
    Newest Member
    PostDigTD1
    Joined
×
×
  • Create New...