Jump to content

obama Has To Be An Anti-Semite!


smitty

Recommended Posts

Absolutely the right thing. Israel has no right to attack Iran. Sometimes you have to punch a friend in the face to keep them from doing something stupid. This isn't about Israel or Iran, but everyone else in the region. What about Russia, who is on Iran's side. The last thing we need is another war going on.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Absolutely the right thing. Israel has no right to attack Iran. Sometimes you have to punch a friend in the face to keep them from doing something stupid. This isn't about Israel or Iran, but everyone else in the region. What about Russia, who is on Iran's side. The last thing we need is another war going on.

 

So Europe was correct i the 1930's to let Germany annex the Sudetenland and Czechoslovakia in order to keep the peace? You know Germany and Russia was on the Germans side back then too.  

 

So allowing a country who believes that their messiahs will only come if they cause mass chaos have nuclear weapons is safe for the region?

 

So would it have been wise for the civilized world to go after Germany when they entered the Rhineland or was it better we waited and did nothing?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So Europe was correct i the 1930's to let Germany annex the Sudetenland and Czechoslovakia in order to keep the peace? You know Germany and Russia was on the Germans side back then too.  

 

So allowing a country who believes that their messiahs will only come if they cause mass chaos have nuclear weapons is safe for the region?

 

So would it have been wise for the civilized world to go after Germany when they entered the Rhineland or was it better we waited and did nothing?

That's the liberal way.......

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So Europe was correct i the 1930's to let Germany annex the Sudetenland and Czechoslovakia in order to keep the peace? You know Germany and Russia was on the Germans side back then too.  

 

So allowing a country who believes that their messiahs will only come if they cause mass chaos have nuclear weapons is safe for the region?

 

So would it have been wise for the civilized world to go after Germany when they entered the Rhineland or was it better we waited and did nothing?

Last I checked Iran isn't invading anyone. The world leaders are working on a deal to allow Iran to have a nuclear program, One that every country that has ill intent for them has.  Iran has no troops close to Israel, likely does not have a Missile that could deliver a Nuke to Israel either.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Last I checked Iran isn't invading anyone. The world leaders are working on a deal to allow Iran to have a nuclear program, One that every country that has ill intent for them has.  Iran has no troops close to Israel, likely does not have a Missile that could deliver a Nuke to Israel either.

 

Iran definitely has a missile that can reach Israel and is capable of carrying a nuclear warhead. And according to this link, they may have, or have in development, one that can reach the U.S.

 

http://www.cbn.com/cbnnews/insideisrael/2015/January/Iranian-ICBM-Can-Reach-the-US/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Member Statistics

    46,206
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    Ceb2000
    Newest Member
    Ceb2000
    Joined


  • Posts

    • Like I said, even if it’s only 10% of the 100 kids BHISD takes from GCCISD each year, that’s 10 athletes per year and that’s being generous.  You’re right about the jobs with BHISD, BTW.  There’s more than 1 athlete from Baytown originally who got transferred to BHISD after a job opened up for Mama.
    • Here’s a link to another story about it This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up
    • It’s behind a paywall but here’s Baytown Sun’s story on it.  It was reported on in other papers statewide so if you search by the date I think you’ll find other stories on it. UIL strengthens student transfer rules By Ron McDowell [email protected] Oct 18, 2024   In order to maintain a level playing field for all member schools, the University Interscholastic League strengthened rules regarding transfer student eligibility at its most recent meeting in Austin. Every year thousands of students transfer schools in the state of Texas. A student’s ability to participate in UIL sanctioned activities may be limited base on the reasons for the transfer. A change in family status, work transfers, enrollment in an academic magnet program, or a move across town, receive scrutiny, but only rarely does one of these reasons result in the loss of eligibility. The only reason to automatically cause the loss of participation eligibility is a transfer for athletic purposes. The current rule, which has been in place since 1981, does not require a Previous Athletic Participation Form (PAPFs) to be submitted if the student-athlete does not participate in a varsity level sport during the first year of enrollment. There has been growing concern among some member schools, that other members are breaking the current rule and creating “super teams” with new transfer enrollees, and that the UIL is not doing enough to police, what appear to be, the inordinate number of transfers among high school athletes. To mitigate these concerns, the UIL approved a proposal to expand the power of the State Executive Committee (SEC) and allow it to investigate schools based upon the number of PAPFs submitted. Schools that submit an inordinate number of PAPFs would face heightened scrutiny and possible public reprimand and future sanctions. The UIL has also changed the requirements for PAPF submission, mandating that the form be submitted before a grade 9-12 transfer student may participate at any level of school athletics. This is a marked departure from the current policy which encourages schools not to complete PAPFs for students who transfer in, if the school believes that the student will not play a varsity sport in the first year the student is enrolled at the new school. Some critics of the current system think that the change doesn’t go far enough. Speaking on background, one local school district source suggested that there should be an automatic year wait for transfer students due to the number of loopholes in the waiver process. “If a student transfers, it should be a year out of competition automatically,” the source said. In addition, the UIL also approved a proposal that gives the SEC the power to appoint an independent administrator to oversee the conduct of the local District Executive Committee (DEC) if it is determined that the DEC is not consistently enforcing the rules of the governing body. The change is significant since all appeals that a school brings, starts and usually ends with the DEC. That includes the determination of transfer student eligibility. It is believed that with the implementation of this change, schools in a UIL district will be less likely to face retribution from the DEC chair and other members. The policy changes will go into effect, Aug. 1, 2025 This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up  
    • I was hoping WOS was going to win. To get another chance to redeem ourself. Silsbee did not look good in that game and has not played consistent during the season. Hopefully against La Vega they will play 4quarters of football
    • This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up   GCCISD paid a firm called PASA to compile this report ahead of them closing/consolidating some schools and redrawing attendance zones.
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...