Jump to content

Repeal the 17th Amendment


RETIREDFAN1

Recommended Posts

This nation will not be able to return to the status of a true federal republic as our Founders intended, until the 17th Amendment is repealed and the selection of Senators is returned to the State Legislatures. The Founders intended for the Senate to be the body of Congress that represented the states. With the 17th Amendment, the Senate is no different from the House. What is needed is an Article V convention with the express purpose of repealing the 17th amendment and returning the selection of Senators back to the original intent of the Founders

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This nation will not be able to return to the status of a true federal republic as our Founders intended, until the 17th Amendment is repealed and the selection of Senators is returned to the State Legislatures. The Founders intended for the Senate to be the body of Congress that represented the states. With the 17th Amendment, the Senate is no different from the House. What is needed is an Article V convention with the express purpose of repealing the 17th amendment and returning the selection of Senators back to the original intent of the Founders

 

Without regard to what system we use and not disagreeing with your premise.......

 

Your argument seems invalid by invoking the Constitution and its original intent as a reason to repeal the amendment. 

 

You say correctly that the Constitution set it up for state legislatures to elect its own Senators. But...... the same Constitution also makes amendments possible in case people's opinions of what the law or rights should be change. Apparently the people made their decision. Those same people also ended slavery by amendment, guaranteed due process for "everyone", the right to keep and bear arms, limit how many times a person can be the president, guaranteed the right to privacy and so on. Which ones of those that are not in the Constitution do you want to give up and get back to the original intent? 

Again, it is not to disagree with your position but arguing intent of the Constitution as opposed to any amendment seems invalid as an argument when you stack it up against other amendments where there was no original intent. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Without regard to what system we use and not disagreeing with your premise.......

 

Your argument seems invalid by invoking the Constitution and its original intent as a reason to repeal the amendment. 

 

You say correctly that the Constitution set it up for state legislatures to elect its own Senators. But...... the same Constitution also makes amendments possible in case people's opinions of what the law or rights should be change. Apparently the people made their decision. Those same people also ended slavery by amendment, guaranteed due process for "everyone", the right to keep and bear arms, limit how many times a person can be the president, guaranteed the right to privacy and so on. Which ones of those that are not in the Constitution do you want to give up and get back to the original intent? 

Again, it is not to disagree with your position but arguing intent of the Constitution as opposed to any amendment seems invalid as an argument when you stack it up against other amendments where there was no original intent. 

You are correct, the people of THAT time allowed tyranny to take hold by ratifying this amendment among others...... IF I can get the People of TODAY to see how their ancestors screwed up and allowed tyranny to take hold in 1913, maybe the people of TODAY will make it their choice to repeal it in order to regain liberty..........

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You are correct, the people of THAT time allowed tyranny to take hold by ratifying this amendment among others...... IF I can get the People of TODAY to see how their ancestors screwed up and allowed tyranny to take hold in 1913, maybe the people of TODAY will make it their choice to repeal it in order to regain liberty..........

 

I honestly think that you are going to have a hard time convincing the people that allowing them to vote for their own senator is tyranny. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I honestly think that you are going to have a hard time convincing the people that allowing them to vote for their own senator is tyranny.



I said it led to the tyranny.....the Senate was set up to represent the interests of the states....the House was set up to represent the interests of the people.....things are out of balance and as more people begin to wake up and see that, I believe that it will be an easy sell......
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Member Statistics

    46,206
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    Ceb2000
    Newest Member
    Ceb2000
    Joined


  • Posts

    • Well Mustang fans it's time for my annual end of season rant. I've had so much company up here on the soapbox that I may have to start charging rent. After 3 years I don't think anything needs to be said. We all know what's wrong. We all know why. So what's the decision at the next board meeting? IMO, there's been enough imaginary success for the board to rubber stamp the Superintendent's vision for our future student athletes. #make every second count Due to soft scheduling and a weaker than normal district. The luck of knocking off 2 ranked opponents early when they were not healthy or still trying to figure it out. Also led to a premature ranking and a hollow DCTF weekly award. The 2 late season losses vs ranked teams proves what we know has been the biggest problem.  Football 19-15 .559 Baseball 9-35 .205 Basketball 19-35 .352 GBB 11-29 .275 Softball 1-22 .043 Volleyball 0-38 .000 Overall 59-174 .253   For anyone living in the district, I ask that you contact you're elected board members publicly and privately. Don't let them think this is exceptable. Be the solution to the equation. Not the divisor. This starts at the top and falls heavily upon those walking the halls. They deserve better.
    • I don't think it's 6-5 maybe 4-3
    • Sounds like a good idea, and something’s been needed for a long time. I know—where my kids & grandkids live now (DFW area)—schools are like revolving doors for athletic purposes. I don’t think the DPISD & LPISD option enrollment are anywhere like that. I assume it’s pretty above board since it was an arrangement apparently agreed to also by the state. I do know some kids that went to LPISD elementary schools in DP chose to go to DPHS because of the district rating. (Of course, at the time, DPISD and DP in general wasn’t very racially mixed like La Porte.) LPISD has a high number of kids on assistance programs compared to DP. Say what you will, it does make it more difficult for educational purposes and scores can reflect as much. LPISD is still rated high even with that challenge. Some of the kids that chose DPHS were very solid athletes that I’m sure LP would love to have had attend LPHS. Of course, part of the big rivalry between DP & LP has always been because DP ‘looked down’ on LP even though we worked side-by-side. Now that Shell DP refinery has been sold to PEMEX, DP is changing. Some aren’t happy about it. Some of us in LP are kinda tickled about it after the history.
    • Got my hotel booked...an hour away. They're having some kind of Light festival, so busy times in Nat.
    • payton missed dunk , and they go get a layup that play hurt 
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...