Jump to content

Garland Texas

77

By 77
in Political Forum

 Share

Recommended Posts

bullets13

bullets13

Posted
Posted

Well when you fly airplanes into buildings, expect Sharia Law to be the law of the land would you not expect people to make fun of your prophet?


Since the extremists have shown a propensity to fly airplanes into buildings, it actually seems like a pretty dumb idea. But it's certainly her right to do so.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • Replies 204
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Popular Posts

tvc184
tvc184

I would like to say congratulations and much respect to the police officer that was facing overwhelming odds and came out on top, potentially saving many lives. For a person with a lone handgun to fac

5GallonBucket
5GallonBucket

some people are just push overs with no spine intact and expect others to follow suit.   try standing firm for something rather than be a push over.   I don't care muslim, jew, hindu, etc etc etc.

thetragichippy
thetragichippy

10 pages about this and you are still talking in circles.   I think we all agree she had a legal right to do that.....   I also agree it was not the smartest thing to do and she knew the risk. If

jv_coach

jv_coach

Posted
Posted

Reading comprehension... it's FUNdamental.

The Islamic terrorist are following the teachings of Muhammad to the letter and the westbary guys are a cult. The leader claims to be Jesus and supported Al Gore for president, so there are two ,for sure, signs that the Westbary guys are neither  Christian nor Baptist. Please have more knowledge about things before you start limiting the 1st amendment. 


 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
jv_coach

jv_coach

Posted
Posted

Since the extremists have shown a propensity to fly airplanes into buildings, it actually seems like a pretty dumb idea. But it's certainly her right to do so.

Since the King(s) of England had a habit of throwing people in jail without trail and executing people who spoke out against them, it was a pretty dumb idea by our Founding Fathers to want to protect freedom of speech.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites
thetragichippy

thetragichippy

Posted
Posted

10 pages about this and you are still talking in circles.

 

I think we all agree she had a legal right to do that.....

 

I also agree it was not the smartest thing to do and she knew the risk. If that amazing cop would have missed and gotten killed, they would of had time to wipe out the entire place.....

 

There comes a time when the risk may not be worth the reward.......just because you can, doesn't mean you should......

Link to comment
Share on other sites
thetragichippy

thetragichippy

Posted
Posted

Again, what good is having a right if you cannot or do not exercise that right???? 

 

Women have a right to go topless in Texas........

 

I also said she had a legal right.......

 

Let me ask you something.....

 

If she does it again with no security, would you participate and bring your family?

 

Me personally.....I would not. To me, drawing a picture of someone I don't believe in would not be worth the POSSIBLE risk. That does not take away my right to do so, I just choose to be cautious because I love my family. 

 

I would hate to say, I lost my family to a terrorist because I wanted to piss him off and make fun of their God.......because I had the legal right.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
RETIREDFAN1

RETIREDFAN1

Posted
Posted

Women have a right to go topless in Texas........

 

I also said she had a legal right.......

 

Let me ask you something.....

 

If she does it again with no security, would you participate and bring your family?

 

Me personally.....I would not. To me, drawing a picture of someone I don't believe in would not be worth the POSSIBLE risk. That does not take away my right to do so, I just choose to be cautious because I love my family. 

 

I would hate to say, I lost my family to a terrorist because I wanted to piss him off and make fun of their God.......because I had the legal right.

Your strawman in no way negates the legitimate question I asked.........

Link to comment
Share on other sites
bullets13

bullets13

Posted
Posted

The Islamic terrorist are following the teachings of Muhammad to the letter and the westbary guys are a cult. The leader claims to be Jesus and supported Al Gore for president, so there are two ,for sure, signs that the Westbary guys are neither  Christian nor Baptist. Please have more knowledge about things before you start limiting the 1st amendment.


No doubt Westboro is a cult, and it's members are cuckoo. which doesn't change the fact that they're following parts of the bible "to the letter" as well. I'm not sure what knowledge you think I'm lacking. I've had ten pages of this crap with you guys imparting all the wisdom i'll never need on the subject.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
bullets13

bullets13

Posted
Posted

Since the King(s) of England had a habit of throwing people in jail without trail and executing people who spoke out against them, it was a pretty dumb idea by our Founding Fathers to want to protect freedom of speech.


like I said earlier in the thread, go express it then! but don't criticize those who think it's stupid to intentionally anger terrorists just to prove a point.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
thetragichippy

thetragichippy

Posted
Posted

Your strawman in no way negates the legitimate question I asked.........

 

OK....I'll play your game.

 

Your "question" "what good is having a right if you cannot or do not exercise that right????"  Your rights should not be taken away. She had EVERY right to have that contest.  Because we are a free country, we are FREE to USE our rights or to not use them.  I am thankful that my girlfriend does not use her right to walk around topless.  So, I think I answered your question.....

 

Now answer mine.......

 

If she does it again with no security, would you participate and bring your family?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
thetragichippy

thetragichippy

Posted
Posted

Your strawman in no way negates the legitimate question I asked.........

 

What exactly did I say that would make you think I was pulling a strawman.......nothing I said was untrue.....and there is a chance she could hold another contest.....so, my question is legitimate....and Garland is only 4 hours away......

Link to comment
Share on other sites
LumRaiderFan

LumRaiderFan

Posted
Posted

And in Texas we can carry guns.....don't necessarily need security.  And if such even was held in Lufkin or Tyler....im pretty sure their would be more than enough citizens packing....

 

But given I have a young family....I wouldn't attend such event....

 

I agree, but the problem is that if we never had another Muslim cartoon lampooning gathering, these animals would simply find other gatherings to ply their craft.

 

They hate us infidels, plain and simple, and don't need a specific motive to act. (9-11)

Link to comment
Share on other sites
jv_coach

jv_coach

Posted
Posted

10 pages about this and you are still talking in circles.

 

I think we all agree she had a legal right to do that.....

 

I also agree it was not the smartest thing to do and she knew the risk. If that amazing cop would have missed and gotten killed, they would of had time to wipe out the entire place.....

 

There comes a time when the risk may not be worth the reward.......just because you can, doesn't mean you should......

So how is that working in Europe now? I mean years of not offending, political correctness  and appeasement  has led to Sharia Law trumping the laws of the land. Yes, there are consequences for every action and the consequences for staying silent in the face of evil is the deadliest of all consequences. 
 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Member Statistics

    46,206
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    Ceb2000
    Newest Member
    Ceb2000
    Joined


  • Posts

    • WOSdrummer99
      Waco La Vega (42) vs West Orange-Stark (20) - FINAL

      By WOSdrummer99 · Posted

      Well Mustang fans it's time for my annual end of season rant. I've had so much company up here on the soapbox that I may have to start charging rent. After 3 years I don't think anything needs to be said. We all know what's wrong. We all know why. So what's the decision at the next board meeting? IMO, there's been enough imaginary success for the board to rubber stamp the Superintendent's vision for our future student athletes. #make every second count Due to soft scheduling and a weaker than normal district. The luck of knocking off 2 ranked opponents early when they were not healthy or still trying to figure it out. Also led to a premature ranking and a hollow DCTF weekly award. The 2 late season losses vs ranked teams proves what we know has been the biggest problem.  Football 19-15 .559 Baseball 9-35 .205 Basketball 19-35 .352 GBB 11-29 .275 Softball 1-22 .043 Volleyball 0-38 .000 Overall 59-174 .253   For anyone living in the district, I ask that you contact you're elected board members publicly and privately. Don't let them think this is exceptable. Be the solution to the equation. Not the divisor. This starts at the top and falls heavily upon those walking the halls. They deserve better.
    • GATA!
      Newton vs Daingerfield

      By GATA! · Posted

      I don't think it's 6-5 maybe 4-3
    • OlDawg
      Barbers Hill (28) vs La Porte (55) - FINAL

      By OlDawg · Posted

      Sounds like a good idea, and something’s been needed for a long time. I know—where my kids & grandkids live now (DFW area)—schools are like revolving doors for athletic purposes. I don’t think the DPISD & LPISD option enrollment are anywhere like that. I assume it’s pretty above board since it was an arrangement apparently agreed to also by the state. I do know some kids that went to LPISD elementary schools in DP chose to go to DPHS because of the district rating. (Of course, at the time, DPISD and DP in general wasn’t very racially mixed like La Porte.) LPISD has a high number of kids on assistance programs compared to DP. Say what you will, it does make it more difficult for educational purposes and scores can reflect as much. LPISD is still rated high even with that challenge. Some of the kids that chose DPHS were very solid athletes that I’m sure LP would love to have had attend LPHS. Of course, part of the big rivalry between DP & LP has always been because DP ‘looked down’ on LP even though we worked side-by-side. Now that Shell DP refinery has been sold to PEMEX, DP is changing. Some aren’t happy about it. Some of us in LP are kinda tickled about it after the history.
    • NDNation
      PNG playing in the boot state is wild

      By NDNation · Posted

      Got my hotel booked...an hour away. They're having some kind of Light festival, so busy times in Nat.
    • T-Lu
      Beaumont United 57 Silsbee 45/FINAL

      By T-Lu · Posted

      payton missed dunk , and they go get a layup that play hurt 

  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...