Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Well when you fly airplanes into buildings, expect Sharia Law to be the law of the land would you not expect people to make fun of your prophet?


Since the extremists have shown a propensity to fly airplanes into buildings, it actually seems like a pretty dumb idea. But it's certainly her right to do so.
Posted

Since the extremists have shown a propensity to fly airplanes into buildings, it actually seems like a pretty dumb idea. But it's certainly her right to do so.

What use is it to have a right, if you don't exercise it??? 

Posted

Reading comprehension... it's FUNdamental.

The Islamic terrorist are following the teachings of Muhammad to the letter and the westbary guys are a cult. The leader claims to be Jesus and supported Al Gore for president, so there are two ,for sure, signs that the Westbary guys are neither  Christian nor Baptist. Please have more knowledge about things before you start limiting the 1st amendment. 


 

Posted

Since the extremists have shown a propensity to fly airplanes into buildings, it actually seems like a pretty dumb idea. But it's certainly her right to do so.

Since the King(s) of England had a habit of throwing people in jail without trail and executing people who spoke out against them, it was a pretty dumb idea by our Founding Fathers to want to protect freedom of speech.   

Posted

10 pages about this and you are still talking in circles.

 

I think we all agree she had a legal right to do that.....

 

I also agree it was not the smartest thing to do and she knew the risk. If that amazing cop would have missed and gotten killed, they would of had time to wipe out the entire place.....

 

There comes a time when the risk may not be worth the reward.......just because you can, doesn't mean you should......

Posted

 

 

There comes a time when the risk may not be worth the reward.......just because you can, doesn't mean you should......

Again, what good is having a right if you cannot or do not exercise that right???? 

Posted

Again, what good is having a right if you cannot or do not exercise that right???? 

 

Women have a right to go topless in Texas........

 

I also said she had a legal right.......

 

Let me ask you something.....

 

If she does it again with no security, would you participate and bring your family?

 

Me personally.....I would not. To me, drawing a picture of someone I don't believe in would not be worth the POSSIBLE risk. That does not take away my right to do so, I just choose to be cautious because I love my family. 

 

I would hate to say, I lost my family to a terrorist because I wanted to piss him off and make fun of their God.......because I had the legal right.

Posted

Women have a right to go topless in Texas........

 

I also said she had a legal right.......

 

Let me ask you something.....

 

If she does it again with no security, would you participate and bring your family?

 

Me personally.....I would not. To me, drawing a picture of someone I don't believe in would not be worth the POSSIBLE risk. That does not take away my right to do so, I just choose to be cautious because I love my family. 

 

I would hate to say, I lost my family to a terrorist because I wanted to piss him off and make fun of their God.......because I had the legal right.

Your strawman in no way negates the legitimate question I asked.........

Posted

The Islamic terrorist are following the teachings of Muhammad to the letter and the westbary guys are a cult. The leader claims to be Jesus and supported Al Gore for president, so there are two ,for sure, signs that the Westbary guys are neither  Christian nor Baptist. Please have more knowledge about things before you start limiting the 1st amendment.


No doubt Westboro is a cult, and it's members are cuckoo. which doesn't change the fact that they're following parts of the bible "to the letter" as well. I'm not sure what knowledge you think I'm lacking. I've had ten pages of this crap with you guys imparting all the wisdom i'll never need on the subject.
Posted

Since the King(s) of England had a habit of throwing people in jail without trail and executing people who spoke out against them, it was a pretty dumb idea by our Founding Fathers to want to protect freedom of speech.


like I said earlier in the thread, go express it then! but don't criticize those who think it's stupid to intentionally anger terrorists just to prove a point.
Posted

Your strawman in no way negates the legitimate question I asked.........

 

OK....I'll play your game.

 

Your "question" "what good is having a right if you cannot or do not exercise that right????"  Your rights should not be taken away. She had EVERY right to have that contest.  Because we are a free country, we are FREE to USE our rights or to not use them.  I am thankful that my girlfriend does not use her right to walk around topless.  So, I think I answered your question.....

 

Now answer mine.......

 

If she does it again with no security, would you participate and bring your family?

Posted

Your strawman in no way negates the legitimate question I asked.........

 

What exactly did I say that would make you think I was pulling a strawman.......nothing I said was untrue.....and there is a chance she could hold another contest.....so, my question is legitimate....and Garland is only 4 hours away......

Posted

And in Texas we can carry guns.....don't necessarily need security.  And if such even was held in Lufkin or Tyler....im pretty sure their would be more than enough citizens packing....

 

But given I have a young family....I wouldn't attend such event....

 

I agree, but the problem is that if we never had another Muslim cartoon lampooning gathering, these animals would simply find other gatherings to ply their craft.

 

They hate us infidels, plain and simple, and don't need a specific motive to act. (9-11)

Posted

10 pages about this and you are still talking in circles.

 

I think we all agree she had a legal right to do that.....

 

I also agree it was not the smartest thing to do and she knew the risk. If that amazing cop would have missed and gotten killed, they would of had time to wipe out the entire place.....

 

There comes a time when the risk may not be worth the reward.......just because you can, doesn't mean you should......

So how is that working in Europe now? I mean years of not offending, political correctness  and appeasement  has led to Sharia Law trumping the laws of the land. Yes, there are consequences for every action and the consequences for staying silent in the face of evil is the deadliest of all consequences. 
 

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Member Statistics

    46,282
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    Unknown472929300
    Newest Member
    Unknown472929300
    Joined
×
×
  • Create New...