Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I don't "know" why the potus should get involved with state matters anyway. I remember the sniper at UT, Richard Speck killing the nurses in Chicago, Charles Manson murders, Zodiac killer, Hillside strangler, Ted Bundy....countless others. No president ever got involved in these crimes. If the murders cross state lines, then the Feds might get involved, but the potus took care of other more important things......like the economy and foreign affairs.

Posted (edited)

I don't no why he hasn't said anything about. I don't no why he should say anything about it. Are you guys feeling left out. Like nobody is speaking for you.... welcome aboard. 

 

Edited by baddog
Posted

This is in response to baddog's post.  When the prez is not qualified to understand the economy or foreign affairs,  he has to get involved in matters he has no business being involved in.

Well sorry but I'm not in the admin. So that will have to do.

Why does he speak on issues that pertain to race when blacks are involved?

Posted

 

Why should he say something about a flag or Ferguson?

Maybe he shouldnt but all you guys jumped on him for that. But so mad he's quite now. Hmmmm

My bad wildcat... 

To the newtown (Google it)

And on bigiot.. maybe he's racist to his other side.

Posted

Good post earlier by baddog.  I tried to reply to it but it ended up somewhere else.  Here goes again.  The prez has to jump on these issues instead of what he should be more concerned with,  because he has no clue how to deal with the economy or foreign affairs.

Posted

A BIG LOL on it being a sign. 

IMO Obama is one of the worst Presidents we had.  I'm being serious  when I say PamFam or Smitty could do better. 

But the saddest thing to me is the choices we've had.  And, again IMO, it won't be much better in 2016.  Dems have Squirrely & Shirley, and the Repubs have the starting football team from the U of DB's.  There's a couple I like, but lately, history tells me they won't make it.  I'll go re-read "No Country for Old Men". Lol

Posted

A BIG LOL on it being a sign. 

IMO Obama is one of the worst Presidents we had.  I'm being serious  when I say PamFam or Smitty could do better. 

But the saddest thing to me is the choices we've had.  And, again IMO, it won't be much better in 2016.  Dems have Squirrely & Shirley, and the Repubs have the starting football team from the U of DB's.  There's a couple I like, but lately, history tells me they won't make it.  I'll go re-read "No Country for Old Men". Lol

​Im prepared to run. Highlight of my campaign: paid Saturdays, Sundays and Mondays off during football season. Vote for me! 

Posted

​Im prepared to run. Highlight of my campaign: paid Saturdays, Sundays and Mondays off during football season. Vote for me! 

Praise The Lord, at last a candidate I can get excited about.  Ain't had one since Reagan.  

BG for President!  (And I thought I couldn't be bought)

Posted (edited)

I don't no why he hasn't said anything about. I don't no why he should say anything about it. Are you guys feeling left out. Like nobody is speaking for you.... welcome aboard. 

​This will be in two parts. First, a little back ground:  1)  Michael Brown in Ferguson was attacking a police officer at the time of his death.  His death drew comments from obama personally.  obama sent in the DOJ and 40 FBI agents after the death.  3 obama officials attended the funeral.   2)  Freddie Grey in Baltimore was a repeat drug offender.  AGAIN, obama spoke personally of Grey's death.  And, obama sent in the DOJ to investigate.  And, again, 3 obama officials attended the funeral.  3)  Trayvon Martin in Florida:  obama spoke to his death.  Which was later rule to be self defense.  4)  In Charleston, the first thing obama did was bring up gun control.  Then jumped on the Confederate Flag band wagon. 

Now, to Kate Steinle in San Fransisco who was killed by a criminal alien:  obama says NOTHING.  No swarm of FBI agents.  No DOJ investigation.   WHY??  

PAM, I'm sure you know the first part I've discussed.  But, I'll explore the "why" in the second part. 

Edited by smitty
Posted

Obama does not need to talk about the woman killed in San Francisco.  He also had no business getting involved with Trayvon, Gardener, or Mike Brown.  Presidents should not be dishing out hot takes on crimes, PARTICULARLY without any details being available.  That being said, apart from politicizing it (which all presidents do when a major incident occurs), I can't criticize him for showing up after the SC church shooting.  A president should be visible after events like that.  I just find it unfortunate that he did not provide the same presence after several other similar tragedies in the past several years.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Member Statistics

    46,282
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    Unknown472929300
    Newest Member
    Unknown472929300
    Joined
×
×
  • Create New...