Jump to content

Sandra Bland/Waller County


Recommended Posts

5 minutes ago, CougarCal said:

I've said all along he should've handed that lady her ticket, followed it with have a nice day ma'am and went about his business.

I reckon he's regretting it now, especially if he has a family to support. Unfortunately situation. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 6 months later...
On 7/26/2016 at 1:29 PM, new tobie said:

This is the hidden content, please

Any idea what the silly accusations means to the case?

It was all on audio and video. What does another officer have to say that will refute what was seen and heard? 

This isn't like something that happened in an alley and it is a head said/she said case. 

If there was an officer witness, why didn't he step in either to assist the officer or if he saw something wrong. Particularly if he saw something illegal as this article and his statement implies. So we have an officer saying, I saw the whole thing and it was wrong.... but I never got involved. 

Ooookay............. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

36 minutes ago, tvc184 said:

Any idea what the silly accusations means to the case?

It was all on audio and video. What does another officer have to say that will refute what was seen and heard? 

This isn't like something that happened in an alley and it is a head said/she said case. 

If there was an officer witness, why didn't he step in either to assist the officer or if he saw something wrong. Particularly if he saw something illegal as this article and his statement implies. So we have an officer saying, I saw the whole thing and it was wrong.... but I never got involved. 

Ooookay............. 

My thoughts are if he couldn't testify because the DA wouldn't allow it and that if he said anything, they would come after him, why hasn't he told what he saw? Surely he has done enough to warrant their coming after him, why not spill the beans?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, baddog said:

My thoughts are if he couldn't testify because the DA wouldn't allow it and that if he said anything, they would come after him, why hasn't he told what he saw? Surely he has done enough to warrant their coming after him, why not spill the beans?

What could he see? It all appeared to be on video.

Now if he saw the trooper get her in the back of the car off camera and slap her around or something like that, he needs to come in and give a statement and if they will not look at it, go outside like to the Rangers and file a report for Official Oppression against the officer. Why come out with an accusation several months later? Why not step in either to help the officer so more force would not be needed or to stop the trooper for doing anything else? 

It all sounds fishy on the claims from an officer. More than likely it is an opinion from an officer (if there even was one) that didn't agree with what was done. Not agreeing does not make it illegal. 

Ordering her out of the car was legal. Putting his hands on her to get her out when she refused was legal. Arresting her for not putting on a turn signal within 100' of a turn is legal.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I watched the video again and when the officer asked he to put out her cigarette, she blew smoke in his face and shot him the finger. You could also tell she knew she was on camera and that's why she played it the way she did. It was all for show. How dramatic. She acted like she wasn't playing with a full deck. People like that do stupid stuff like take their own life.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...
2 hours ago, nappyroots said:

This is the hidden content, please

Wrongful death? The woman committed suicide! How is that wrongful death? The sheriff there, was a member on the deer lease I run, and he dropped off the lease because he did not have time to even come out there, with all the crap behind this mess.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, XX Man said:

Wrongful death? The woman committed suicide! How is that wrongful death? The sheriff there, was a member on the deer lease I run, and he dropped off the lease because he did not have time to even come out there, with all the crap behind this mess.

just posted info XXMan did't say who was right or wrong

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, PAMFAM10 said:

How exactly did Freddie gray kill himself.

Slamming his head against the steel wall of the wagon he was in. As witnessed by his co-prisoner and statement given or at least up until the lawyers got involved and he changed his story. The police weren't paying and the private attorney was. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Member Statistics

    46,206
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    Ceb2000
    Newest Member
    Ceb2000
    Joined



  • Posts

    • Like I said, even if it’s only 10% of the 100 kids BHISD takes from GCCISD each year, that’s 10 athletes per year and that’s being generous.  You’re right about the jobs with BHISD, BTW.  There’s more than 1 athlete from Baytown originally who got transferred to BHISD after a job opened up for Mama.
    • Here’s a link to another story about it This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up
    • It’s behind a paywall but here’s Baytown Sun’s story on it.  It was reported on in other papers statewide so if you search by the date I think you’ll find other stories on it. UIL strengthens student transfer rules By Ron McDowell [email protected] Oct 18, 2024   In order to maintain a level playing field for all member schools, the University Interscholastic League strengthened rules regarding transfer student eligibility at its most recent meeting in Austin. Every year thousands of students transfer schools in the state of Texas. A student’s ability to participate in UIL sanctioned activities may be limited base on the reasons for the transfer. A change in family status, work transfers, enrollment in an academic magnet program, or a move across town, receive scrutiny, but only rarely does one of these reasons result in the loss of eligibility. The only reason to automatically cause the loss of participation eligibility is a transfer for athletic purposes. The current rule, which has been in place since 1981, does not require a Previous Athletic Participation Form (PAPFs) to be submitted if the student-athlete does not participate in a varsity level sport during the first year of enrollment. There has been growing concern among some member schools, that other members are breaking the current rule and creating “super teams” with new transfer enrollees, and that the UIL is not doing enough to police, what appear to be, the inordinate number of transfers among high school athletes. To mitigate these concerns, the UIL approved a proposal to expand the power of the State Executive Committee (SEC) and allow it to investigate schools based upon the number of PAPFs submitted. Schools that submit an inordinate number of PAPFs would face heightened scrutiny and possible public reprimand and future sanctions. The UIL has also changed the requirements for PAPF submission, mandating that the form be submitted before a grade 9-12 transfer student may participate at any level of school athletics. This is a marked departure from the current policy which encourages schools not to complete PAPFs for students who transfer in, if the school believes that the student will not play a varsity sport in the first year the student is enrolled at the new school. Some critics of the current system think that the change doesn’t go far enough. Speaking on background, one local school district source suggested that there should be an automatic year wait for transfer students due to the number of loopholes in the waiver process. “If a student transfers, it should be a year out of competition automatically,” the source said. In addition, the UIL also approved a proposal that gives the SEC the power to appoint an independent administrator to oversee the conduct of the local District Executive Committee (DEC) if it is determined that the DEC is not consistently enforcing the rules of the governing body. The change is significant since all appeals that a school brings, starts and usually ends with the DEC. That includes the determination of transfer student eligibility. It is believed that with the implementation of this change, schools in a UIL district will be less likely to face retribution from the DEC chair and other members. The policy changes will go into effect, Aug. 1, 2025 This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up  
    • I was hoping WOS was going to win. To get another chance to redeem ourself. Silsbee did not look good in that game and has not played consistent during the season. Hopefully against La Vega they will play 4quarters of football
    • This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up   GCCISD paid a firm called PASA to compile this report ahead of them closing/consolidating some schools and redrawing attendance zones.
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...