Jump to content

I've come up with a new playoff system for college football


bullets13

Recommended Posts

Go to an 8-team playoff. all 1-loss and undefeated power conference teams get in.  If there are more than eight undefeated or 1-loss power conference teams then use rankings to determine play-in games.  If there are less than eight 1-loss or better teams from power conferences then undefeated teams from other conferences get in before you consider 2-loss teams.  use the rankings to determine seeding, as well as which 2-loss teams to include when there are openings to fill.  Use strength of schedule to help determine rankings to keep teams from scheduling straight cupcakes in their OOC schedule.  This system would work every year and give a tangible standard for making the playoffs.

# of undefeated and 1-loss power conference teams over the last 10 years going into the bowl games:

2014-6
2013-6
2012-5
2011-4
2010-7
2009-5 (+undefeated Boise st)
2008-7 (+undefeated Boise st and Utah)
2007-ONE (+undefeated Hawaii)
2006-5 (+undefeated Boise st)
2005-6 

there will be no more than 8 this year, and likely less.

PROBLEM SOLVED!

Edited by bullets13
Link to comment
Share on other sites

That would eliminate the good out of conference matchups.  There would be no need to schedule tough non conference games.  Everyone would adopt the Art Briles model and schedule the school for the blind 4 times.  

Really, they could schedule Western Carolina.

System looks ok to me bullets.

Edited by baddog
Link to comment
Share on other sites

That would eliminate the good out of conference matchups.  There would be no need to schedule tough non conference games.  Everyone would adopt the Art Briles model and schedule the school for the blind 4 times.  

sec gets the most respect and leeway in the polls and they do this already.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

sec gets the most respect and leeway in the polls and they do this already.

They all schedule at least one good out of conference game. 

 

Here is the OOC games for 2016 that would all go away under your plan.  

 

Alabama- USC

Arkansas- TCU

Auburn- Clemson

Florida- Florida St

Georgia- North Carolina, Georgia Tech

Kentucky- Louisville 

LSU- Wisconsin 

Ole Miss- Florida St

Miss St- BYU

Mizzou- West Virginia 

South Carolina- Clemson

Tennessee- Virginia Tech

Texas A&M-  UCLA

Vandy- Georgia Tech

 

 

The rivalry games would probably stay, but no way coaches would schedule the other games when there is no benefit.

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They all schedule at least one good out of conference game. 

 

Here is the OOC games for 2016 that would all go away under your plan.  

 

Alabama- USC

Arkansas- TCU

Auburn- Clemson

Florida- Florida St

Georgia- North Carolina, Georgia Tech

Kentucky- Louisville 

LSU- Wisconsin 

Ole Miss- Florida St

Miss St- BYU

Mizzou- West Virginia 

South Carolina- Clemson

Tennessee- Virginia Tech

Texas A&M-  UCLA

Vandy- Georgia Tech

 

 

The rivalry games would probably stay, but no way coaches would schedule the other games when there is no benefit.

 

 

 

 

alabama could ditch WKU and still play USC. Arkansas could ditch Alcorn St to keep TCU. I probably could go into each of those schools schedule and find a cupcake to remove so they could still keep the biggie if I had the time to. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They all schedule at least one good out of conference game. 

 

Here is the OOC games for 2016 that would all go away under your plan.  

 

Alabama- USC

Arkansas- TCU

Auburn- Clemson

Florida- Florida St

Georgia- North Carolina, Georgia Tech

Kentucky- Louisville 

LSU- Wisconsin 

Ole Miss- Florida St

Miss St- BYU

Mizzou- West Virginia 

South Carolina- Clemson

Tennessee- Virginia Tech

Texas A&M-  UCLA

Vandy- Georgia Tech

 

 

The rivalry games would probably stay, but no way coaches would schedule the other games when there is no benefit.

 

 

 

 

i could deal with losing 15 good matchups to have an 8-game playoff with a consistent qualifying requirement.  And if these teams eliminate their tough OOC games then we'll get to see more great matchups in playin games to get into the final 8.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

alabama could ditch WKU and still play USC. Arkansas could ditch Alcorn St to keep TCU. I probably could go into each of those schools schedule and find a cupcake to remove so they could still keep the biggie if I had the time to. 

I'm saying there would be no point to schedule good teams if the whole goal is to have less than 2 losses.

 

Stanford played 12 Power 5 schools this season with their 2 losses being on the road at #16 Northwestern and #17 Oregon by 2 points.  Take out the non conference loss to NW and Stanford is a lock for the playoff even above OU.  There would be no benifit to playing a good shedule. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i could deal with losing 15 good matchups to have an 8-game playoff with a consistent qualifying requirement.  And if these teams eliminate their tough OOC games then we'll get to see more great matchups in playin games to get into the final 8.

15 good matchups in 1 conference!!! There are 4 other conferences that claim to play big boy football also.  I guess I'm too big of a college football fan to miss out on all of those games throughout the season.  

 

8 teams with 5 conference champions and 3 wild cards is the way to go 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm saying there would be no point to schedule good teams if the whole goal is to have less than 2 losses.

 

Stanford played 12 Power 5 schools this season with their 2 losses being on the road at #16 Northwestern and #17 Oregon by 2 points.  Take out the non conference loss to NW and Stanford is a lock for the playoff even above OU.  There would be no benifit to playing a good shedule. 

oh ok, I gotcha. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here's a plan- 8 Teams

Power 5 Conference Champs (ACC, Big XII, SEC, Pac 12, Big 10)

3 Highest rated Mid-Major Conference Champs plus Highest Rated Independent 

Win your conference!

So you don't care to have the best teams playing for the championship?

 

11-1 defending national champ Ohio State would be watching from home while Houston, Bowling Green, and San Diego St played for a championship.  No one wants to see that, especially the tv stations that would lose their butts showing crap playoff games.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So you don't care to have the best teams playing for the championship?

 

11-1 defending national champ Ohio State would be watching from home while Houston, Bowling Green, and San Diego St played for a championship.  No one wants to see that, especially the tv stations that would lose their butts showing crap playoff games.  

thats the problem right there. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So you don't care to have the best teams playing for the championship?

 

11-1 defending national champ Ohio State would be watching from home while Houston, Bowling Green, and San Diego St played for a championship.  No one wants to see that, especially the tv stations that would lose their butts showing crap playoff games.  

No. They had an opportunity to win their conference. They lost. They are obviously NOT the BEST team.

Your conference games are the 1st round of the playoff. Just like the NCAA tournament- Survive and Advance.

If you're TRULY the best team, then win your conference. I am tired of the TV networks deciding what teams are qualified to play. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

thats the problem right there. 

Do you want to watch Clemson vs Bowling Green in a first round matchup?  BG lost to an average Sec team at Tennessee by 29 points!  So GCM thinks they deserve a shot because they won a terrible mid major conference?  That makes zero sense.  

 

Let's the best teams decide it on the field. 5 champs and 3 wildcards.  ND is taken care of if they are worthy as well as other really good teams that didn't win their conference.  Lets use 2014 as an example because that's all we have of the playoff.  

 

#1  Bama vs #8 Michigan St

#2  Oregon vs #7 Miss St

#3  FSU vs #6 TCU

#4  Ohio St vs #5 Baylor

 

 

Under GCM's plan 

Bama, Oregon, FSU, Ohio St and whichever "One True Champion"'came out of the Big 12 would still be in.  One would tie for the conference title and sit at home like they did anyways.  

 

The last 3 spots would be between Boise St, Marshall, Northern Illinois, and Memphis.  Ole Miss was #9 last year and would be left out.  They beat Boise and UNI by 22 & 21 points respectively.  Arkansas beat Memphis by 38 points!  Why would any of them deserve to make the playoff just because they win a crap conference?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Do you want to watch Clemson vs Bowling Green in a first round matchup?  BG lost to an average Sec team at Tennessee by 29 points!  So GCM thinks they deserve a shot because they won a terrible mid major conference?  That makes zero sense.  

 

Let's the best teams decide it on the field. 5 champs and 3 wildcards.  ND is taken care of if they are worthy as well as other really good teams that didn't win their conference.  Lets use 2014 as an example because that's all we have of the playoff.  

 

#1  Bama vs #8 Michigan St

#2  Oregon vs #7 Miss St

#3  FSU vs #6 TCU

#4  Ohio St vs #5 Baylor

 

 

Under GCM's plan 

Bama, Oregon, FSU, Ohio St and whichever "One True Champion"'came out of the Big 12 would still be in.  One would tie for the conference title and sit at home like they did anyways.  

 

The last 3 spots would be between Boise St, Marshall, Northern Illinois, and Memphis.  Ole Miss was #9 last year and would be left out.  They beat Boise and UNI by 22 & 21 points respectively.  Arkansas beat Memphis by 38 points!  Why would any of them deserve to make the playoff just because they win a crap conference?

yes. Id rather Toledo versus them though for personal reasons. 

Arkansas beat Memphis when? Sure wasn't this year. 

 

 

I guess you wont be watching anymore NCAA Tournaments right? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Do you want to watch Clemson vs Bowling Green in a first round matchup?  BG lost to an average Sec team at Tennessee by 29 points!  So GCM thinks they deserve a shot because they won a terrible mid major conference?  That makes zero sense.  

 

Let's the best teams decide it on the field. 5 champs and 3 wildcards.  ND is taken care of if they are worthy as well as other really good teams that didn't win their conference.  Lets use 2014 as an example because that's all we have of the playoff.  

 

#1  Bama vs #8 Michigan St

#2  Oregon vs #7 Miss St

#3  FSU vs #6 TCU

#4  Ohio St vs #5 Baylor

 

 

Under GCM's plan 

Bama, Oregon, FSU, Ohio St and whichever "One True Champion"'came out of the Big 12 would still be in.  One would tie for the conference title and sit at home like they did anyways.  

 

The last 3 spots would be between Boise St, Marshall, Northern Illinois, and Memphis.  Ole Miss was #9 last year and would be left out.  They beat Boise and UNI by 22 & 21 points respectively.  Arkansas beat Memphis by 38 points!  Why would any of them deserve to make the playoff just because they win a crap conference?

If you're better, then just beat them on the field. Why does a team with 1 loss (or even 2) deserve to get in a playoff simply because of their conference affiliation?

Win your conference and beat the "scrubs" and you're a National Champ. Seems fair to me. If you're the "best", just win baby.

Why should ESPN decide who plays? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you're better, then just beat them on the field. Why does a team with 1 loss (or even 2) deserve to get in a playoff simply because of their conference affiliation?

I'm not worried about conference affiliation at all.  I say pick the best teams not champions of scrub conferences that got hammered when they played against average Power 5 schools like my examples above. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Member Statistics

    46,204
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    TJ_40
    Newest Member
    TJ_40
    Joined



  • Posts

    • noticed that 99.99% of law enforcement sides with Trump? The part of the judicial system who disagrees with Trump is the prosecutors and judges….and it’s certainly not all of them either. Good thing he has the judges that really count on his side. 
    • What news station do you watch?…..never mind.    What age are the children you take care of. Refugees from where? Are they in a hospital? Now children compared to criminals…..geeeez. The mayor of Denver and a few governors, including Newsom, have said they will not turn over incarcerated criminals to ICE. This is a felony. They are harboring criminals and fugitives. Gee, I’m so glad you want criminals protected. Anyone who crossed illegally into our country is a criminal. Happy Holidays to you and yours.
    • Sorry sir on my miss count. I was in hurry
    • Are they offering refuge to criminals? Or is it a Trump talking point? Refugees are people who leave their country due to unwarranted prosecution. I actually take care of 2 refugee kids who have complex medical needs   No, refugees are not criminals, and the assumption that they are more likely to be criminals than the general population is incorrect:                                                                                          Research shows immigrants commit crimes at lower rates Immigrants in the United States commit crimes at lower rates than the U.S.-born population, including unauthorized immigrants. This is true across immigrant groups.                  Immigration doesn't raise crime rates Immigrants don't raise crime rates in the communities where they settle. In fact, some studies suggest that immigration can lower crime rates, especially violent crime.                  Anti-immigration politicians have spread a myth Anti-immigration politicians have repeatedly tried to link immigrants to crime, but research shows this is a myth.                  Refugees don't cause crime in Turkey A study found that refugees don't have a causal effect on crime rates in Turkey. In fact, the study found that refugees may have a negative effect on crime rates per capita. 
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...