Ty Cobb Posted February 15, 2007 Report Posted February 15, 2007 Calm down guys. It seems you are putting to much emphasis on a scrimmage.
bignasty69 Posted February 15, 2007 Report Posted February 15, 2007 Calm down guys. It seems you are putting to much emphasis on a scrimmage. I agree this is stupid cause everyone on here knows that HJ would kill Liberty straight up.
hardhitter35 Posted February 15, 2007 Report Posted February 15, 2007 if they would kill liberty straight up why didnt they last night..it was a VARSITY Scrimmage!! so why would you pull your best kids in a VARSITY scrimmage!! liberty is gonna make some noise watch and c
HJ_3 Posted February 15, 2007 Report Posted February 15, 2007 liberty is not good hj just didnt play well last night and even wiht there terriable paly they still tied but in my book thats a lose to a TERRIABLE team like that like 40 water said HJ was just testin some JV players out to see wat they were capable of
OldTimer Posted February 15, 2007 Report Posted February 15, 2007 Hj-3 - Sorry but please learn to spell. I never stated that HJ was a bad team but you and your friends seem to making a lot of excuses about how bad your team played. Sorry but that is exactly what they are excuses. Liberty did not play their starters the entire game either – that is why it is called a scrimmage. You are as good as you play and if you think Liberty is terrible and you tied them – I am saying that makes you terrible as well. For the record I do not think that Liberty is a bad team – just the opposite I think they will be good this year. I also agree with Ty Cobb – this was a scrimmage – lets wait till the regular season and see who is the better team. HJ may well be better then Liberty – they just failed to prove it last night.
PANTHERPLAYA09 Posted February 15, 2007 Report Posted February 15, 2007 Well I thought the score was 4-3 Liberty but like yall said it was a scrimmage. It seems that the people that back HJ are the ones making excuses. I think Liberty just played well. They didnt play all their starters the whole game and I think that was obvious since it was a scrimmage.
Ty Cobb Posted February 15, 2007 Report Posted February 15, 2007 Hold on everyone. I've heard that the scrimmage didn't even have umpires. Is this true?
OldTimer Posted February 15, 2007 Report Posted February 15, 2007 Yes - no umpires - the catchers called the balls and strikes.
Wiggins_Crony Posted February 16, 2007 Report Posted February 16, 2007 All I really want to know is how did both teams play?
Ty Cobb Posted February 16, 2007 Report Posted February 16, 2007 Yes - no umpires - the catchers called the balls and strikes.Let me get this right; this was a scrimmage with no umpires and there are people on here acting like it's the World Series. WOW!!! Lucky for us these teams are in opposite districts. I would hate to see what happens if they played a game with real umpires.
Guest 12pack Posted February 16, 2007 Report Posted February 16, 2007 This thread makes me laugh...Why all the controversy over a scrimmage..anyone who knows anything about the game would tell you that a scrimmage is just a glorified practice...you are just getting to see someone else's arm other than your coach's..Only the 1st 2,3 or MAYBE 4 innings would be a gamelike situation..and that would depend on the bodies available..If you all want to keep arguing over a scrimmage, by all means go ahead, but it is rediculous..
hardhitter35 Posted February 16, 2007 Report Posted February 16, 2007 haha that might be the funniest thing i have saw all year!!!
OldTimer Posted February 16, 2007 Report Posted February 16, 2007 Yeah - this is great - kinda puts me in my place. :-[
PANTHERPLAYA09 Posted February 16, 2007 Report Posted February 16, 2007 ya guess yall are right.................it was fun for awhile though. ;D
Recommended Posts