Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
13 hours ago, REBgp said:

This is the hidden content, please

Nothing sticks to Teflon 

The killing part for me is that we have people wanting to give Hillary a pass on this because they weren't classified as "top secret" when sent. However, we have people who can read these emails now and classify them as such. How in the world can our president and Secretary of state not have a clue? It doesn't take a genius to see this.

This is the hidden content, please

Posted

My thots bd, and they're all just a guess.  Those two and the people they've surrounded themselves with are:  1- to dumb to realize the importance:  2- think they're so important they're above it:  3 - don't care who knows our secrets (want others to know?).   In reality, it's probably an "all of the above".

Found this interesting tidbit about the Clintons and I throughly enjoyed it, being it's from a conservative actor (very rare species lol).  

This is the hidden content, please

Posted
5 hours ago, BS Wildcats said:

She had a good teacher the last 8 years

Although it's true and pathetic, couldn't help but lmbo.  

What's really pathetic, the mainstream media is not B-slapping the Justice Dept for not bringing all the FBI evidence to a Grand Jury.  Essentially flipping off the citizens, and laws of this country.  If you don't believe there's a long term conspiracy to change our form of Govt, you might want to rethink that.  Look at what's happened to, and the actions of, both parties in the last 15 years.  And open your mind to at least the possibility, before you analyze the information.  Note what happened to others recently who made Top Secret information available.  I guess it depends on what your definition of "is" is.  MDA (My Dying A--)

Posted

Just wondering your thoughts....  If Obama realizes that Hillary won't win a general election, do you think he will go ahead with the conviction if the FBI recommends a conviction? or will he stop the process after the FBI makes their recommendation?  After seeing what happened with the IRS scandal and Ohio in the 2012 election, it is hard to see them actually convicting Hillary, even though EVERY one in America knows what she did was illegal.

Posted
2 hours ago, PURPLE 4EVER said:

Just wondering your thoughts....  If Obama realizes that Hillary won't win a general election, do you think he will go ahead with the conviction if the FBI recommends a conviction? or will he stop the process after the FBI makes their recommendation?  After seeing what happened with the IRS scandal and Ohio in the 2012 election, it is hard to see them actually convicting Hillary, even though EVERY one in America knows what she did was illegal.

Prosecute Hillary or Bill?  Not if they shot the whole S. Court in the middle of DC.   They are, and have been, above the law. 

Posted

This is the hidden content, please

From the article:

While Hillary Clinton and Bernie Sanders sparred Thursday night over issues ranging from health care to police brutality to campaign finance -- and even who liked Henry Kissinger – what was glaringly missing was any mention of the government's investigations into Clinton’s email use or the Clinton Foundation.

Both PBS moderators -- Judy Woodruff and Gwen Ifill -- and Sanders ignored the controversies that have dogged Clinton's candidacy, despite fresh developments on both fronts.

I wonder if Republicans would have received the same treatment...doubtful.

Of course, most folks that are voting for Hillary don't care about this witch hunt nonsense anyway.

Posted

Republicans received the same treatment?  Not in the Socialist Media.  But you know that.  I'm guessing you were "throwing out some chum bait" to get a liberal to bite.  All you got was an old conservative :) 

Posted
48 minutes ago, REBgp said:

LFR, I found a reason.  When researching Hillery, you not only find dirt under the rug, but the couch, chairs, bed, and bank book. 

This is the hidden content, please

The liberal media (most of it) refuse to do their jobs...with Democrats anyway.

This "biased media theory" is nonsense to the left (so they say) and they scoff at it like clear thinkers scoff at man-made global warming.

Anyone within reason would expect her to get questions about these events...especially from such "esteemed" members of the press.

Must have slipped their mind.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Member Statistics

    46,282
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    Unknown472929300
    Newest Member
    Unknown472929300
    Joined


×
×
  • Create New...