AggiesAreWe Posted February 18, 2016 Report Share Posted February 18, 2016 Today is the day UIL will hear all appeals in regards to the realignment this past Feb. 1. We will know the status of Beaumont West Brook and Beaumont Harmony Science appeals later today. Also big news regarding Livingston. It appears that Livingston turned in inaccurate numbers for realignment. Their accurate snap shot number actually will keep them in 5A. Will be interesting to see how UIL handles this. If Livingston goes back to 5A (which they should) this will cause several teams to look for games to complete their 10 game schedule. CardinalBacker 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pepper Brooks Posted February 18, 2016 Report Share Posted February 18, 2016 1 minute ago, AggiesAreWe said: Today is the day UIL will hear all appeals in regards to the realignment this past Feb. 1. We will know the status of Beaumont West Brook and Beaumont Harmony Science appeals later today. Also big news regarding Livingston. It appears that Livingston turned in inaccurate numbers for realignment. Their accurate snap shot number actually will keep them in 5A. Will be interesting to see how UIL handles this. If Livingston goes back to 5A (which they should) this will cause several teams to look for games to complete their 10 game schedule. I know it is hard to predict what the UIL will do, but what do you think they will do with Beaumont Harmony Science? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hitch Posted February 18, 2016 Report Share Posted February 18, 2016 If they move Livingston back to 5A, which district will they go? to Beaumont and make a 9 to Huntsville, Willis, Brenham, Magnolia, Tomball, Waller and make a 9 new caney, kingwood, splendora, Dayton, mont belvieu, humble, Crosby which they are geographically closer. Keep 20 and 22 at 8 ( even number ) and make 21 a 10 ( even number ). This also affects fewer overall teams. Alpha Wolf 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alpha Wolf Posted February 18, 2016 Report Share Posted February 18, 2016 So I guess Ozen's enrollment numbers were right keeping them in 5A? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AshlyHasBeen Posted February 18, 2016 Report Share Posted February 18, 2016 Alice and Calallen just were approved to move to 30-5A. It's now an 11-team district! Plans are to have zones. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AshlyHasBeen Posted February 18, 2016 Report Share Posted February 18, 2016 Medina Valley denied move to 29-5A. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
itsallabouttheH Posted February 18, 2016 Report Share Posted February 18, 2016 Going to be some changes and havoc to deal with soon.............. Pepper Brooks 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AshlyHasBeen Posted February 18, 2016 Report Share Posted February 18, 2016 Llano denied Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AshlyHasBeen Posted February 18, 2016 Report Share Posted February 18, 2016 Harmony Science is not part of today's appeal. They've elected not to be part of a UIL district at this time. Here's a statement from their AD. "Due to a miscommunication during the UIL re-alignment process, we were placed into a district that doesn't match our student athlete's needs. While we are saddened at the loss of conference play, we are grateful to the UIL and the other district 22-4A schools for allowing us to withdraw until the re-alignment process begins again." Pepper Brooks 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pepper Brooks Posted February 18, 2016 Report Share Posted February 18, 2016 9 minutes ago, ShlyKBMT said: Harmony Science is not part of today's appeal. They've elected not to be part of a UIL district at this time. Here's a statement from their AD. "Due to a miscommunication during the UIL re-alignment process, we were placed into a district that doesn't match our student athlete's needs. While we are saddened at the loss of conference play, we are grateful to the UIL and the other district 22-4A schools for allowing us to withdraw until the re-alignment process begins again." Thanks for the info Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AggiesAreWe Posted February 18, 2016 Author Report Share Posted February 18, 2016 No Harmony Science in basketball district with Bridge City, LC-M, Orangefield, Hamshire-Fannett, Silsbee and WO-S. Will be just a 6 team district for basketball and baseball. 10 district games. Hardin-Jefferson will stay in district with Cleveland, Huffman, Liberty, Shepherd and Tarkington. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JSnipes Posted February 18, 2016 Report Share Posted February 18, 2016 So if Harmony Science would have appealed and lost, would they not have been able to withdraw from being part of UIL? If they could withdraw afterwards, why wouldn't they just wait and see if their appeal was denied before withdrawing? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
coachhooker01 Posted February 18, 2016 Report Share Posted February 18, 2016 33 minutes ago, ShlyKBMT said: Llano denied what did they appeal for? Used to work coach in Llano just interested on what they appealed for Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kicker Posted February 18, 2016 Report Share Posted February 18, 2016 1 hour ago, coachhooker01 said: what did they appeal for? Used to work coach in Llano just interested on what they appealed for From another site 6 UIL District Assignment Appeals Committee to Meet FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE AUSTIN— The District Assignment Appeals Committee of the University Interscholastic League will convene at 9:00 a.m., Thursday, February 18 at the UIL Office in Austin to hear reclassification and realignment appeals. After the UIL released its biennial reclassification and realignment data on Feb. 1, all schools were given the opportunity to appeal their district and conference assignments. Schools Scheduled to Appeal District Assignment: School Original District Requested District 1. Corpus Christi Calallen 5A – 29 5A – 30 2. Alice 5A – 29 5A – 30 3. Castroville Medina Valley 5A – 26 5A – 29 4. Frankston 3A DII – 10 3A DII – 8 5. Llano 4A – 19 (Basketball) 4A – 28 6. Eustace 3A DI – 9 3A DI – 7 7. San Angelo Central 6A – 8 (Basketball) 6A – 2 8. Wylie 6A – 6 6A – 10 9. Beaumont West Brook 6A – 12 6A – 22 10. Pflugerville Connally 5A – 19 5A – 25 11. Buda Hays 6A – 25 6A – 14 12. Kyle Lehman 6A – 25 6A – 14 13. Lockhart 5A – 26 5A – 25 14. Apple Springs* 1A DII – 15 1A DI – 16 15. Pharr San Juan Alamo Southwest* 5A – 32 6A – 31 16. San Antonio Fox Tech* 5A – 28 3A – 26 17. Fort Worth Young Men’s Leadership* 6A – 4 5A – 7 18. Fort Worth Young Women’s Leadership* 6A – 4 5A – 7 * Indicates that the school has received a unanimous vote of approval from both the original district and the receiving district. The meeting of the Assignment Appeals Committee is open to the public and all interested parties are welcome to attend. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pepper Brooks Posted February 18, 2016 Report Share Posted February 18, 2016 Llano appeal to UIL re: changing from District 19-4A to 28-4A (travel concerns) for basketball DENIED. Unanimous "no" from district schools. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Peppermint Patty Posted February 18, 2016 Report Share Posted February 18, 2016 BREAKING: West Brook football will remain in District 12-6A, all other sports however will be moved to District 22-6A. Seems odd. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AshlyHasBeen Posted February 18, 2016 Report Share Posted February 18, 2016 UIL will has ruled on West Brook's appeal. Bruins will remain in 12-6A for football, but will compete in 22-6A in all other sports. 12-6A Football West Brook Conroe Oak Ridge The Woodlands College Park Lufkin Montgomery 22-6A Other Sports West Brook Deer Park La Porte Pasadena Pasadena Dobie Pasadena Memorial Pasadena Rayburn South Houston Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AshlyHasBeen Posted February 18, 2016 Report Share Posted February 18, 2016 Wylie denied Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Just an old Coach Posted February 18, 2016 Report Share Posted February 18, 2016 How did Frankston's appeal go? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pepper Brooks Posted February 18, 2016 Report Share Posted February 18, 2016 Quote Eustace High School lost its appeal today during the UIL meeting. They will remain in District 9-3A, Region III in football Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AshlyHasBeen Posted February 18, 2016 Report Share Posted February 18, 2016 Eustace, San Angelo Central, Wylie, & Medina Valley have been denied by UIL. Doen't look promising for Hays, Lehman, Connally & Lockhart. This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
coachhooker01 Posted February 18, 2016 Report Share Posted February 18, 2016 31 minutes ago, Pepper Brooks said: Llano appeal to UIL re: changing from District 19-4A to 28-4A (travel concerns) for basketball DENIED. Unanimous "no" from district schools. Thank you Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Peppermint Patty Posted February 18, 2016 Report Share Posted February 18, 2016 21 minutes ago, ShlyKBMT said: UIL will has ruled on West Brook's appeal. Bruins will remain in 12-6A for football, but will compete in 22-6A in all other sports. 12-6A Football West Brook Conroe Oak Ridge The Woodlands College Park Lufkin Montgomery 22-6A Other Sports West Brook Deer Park La Porte Pasadena Pasadena Dobie Pasadena Memorial Pasadena Rayburn South Houston So much for the UIL's "proximity" argument that they have used with GCCISD for years. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AshlyHasBeen Posted February 18, 2016 Report Share Posted February 18, 2016 Lehman denied. Livingston issue should be coming up soon. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pepper Brooks Posted February 18, 2016 Report Share Posted February 18, 2016 Hays & Lehman tried to get out of the district with Westlake, Lake Travis, Vandegrift, Vista Ridge & Leander. UIL says "No". Appeal DENIED. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.