Today is Appeals Day at UIL

[Gabe]

1 minute ago, RaiderRed30 said:

Key word is only for football. No decision has been made for basketball and other sports.

This would be for all sports. It is a move up in classifications from 4A to 5A

[RaiderRed30]

Very surpised that Central did not win, Amarillo must have a lot of pull within UIL. Hays and Lehman not moving means passing through Austin ISD's district to travel to North Austin, while San Marcos travels through both schools to Austin ISD. Just all around confusing.

West Brook was probably the best outcome they could get.

Alice and Calallen is the most shocking thing. I understand travel distance, but UIL swore off 11 team districts after the Fort Worth disaster. Now one team in their district is only going to have 9 games with a bye at the end of the season.

[RaiderRed30]

2 minutes ago, Gabe said:

This would be for all sports. It is a move up in classifications from 4A to 5A

I thought I read somewhere that no decision has been made for other sports. Only football was decided today.

[Gabe]

2 minutes ago, RaiderRed30 said:

I thought I read somewhere that no decision has been made for other sports. Only football was decided today.

I am pretty certain this would mean all sports in Llvingston's case going up in a classification. You can't play 4A all other sports and football 5A. 

[AshlyHasBeen]

No decision has been made for all sports in regards to Livingston. West Brook will be playing in a different district for football than the rest of sports. Keep that in mind.

[CRUSHCOACH]

 But you're talking classifications with Livingston. They won't be allowed to play in 5A for football and 4A for other sports.

[Gabe]

1 minute ago, ShlyKBMT said:

No decision has been made for all sports in regards to Livingston. West Brook will be playing in a different district for football than the rest of sports. Keep that in mind.

My mistake then. I guess they could stick them in another 5A district for other sports. I wasn't think of that. My mistake

[AshlyHasBeen]

1 minute ago, CRUSHCOACH said:

 But you're talking classifications with Livingston. They won't be allowed to play in 5A for football and 4A for other sports.

Yes, but they could be assigned to a different district for other sports just like West Brook.

[AshlyHasBeen]

Flanigan was unaware that Livingston was added until I just messaged him. I'm sure BISD will be getting involved.

I would think they would force Central and WB to play week 1.

[wo-76]

what district in 4a did Livingston.. move from.they will be searching for a non district game.what are the teams in that district?

[Gabe]

District 10-4A DI with BC Cleveland Huffman Navasota LCM and Silsbee

[Alpha Wolf]

33 minutes ago, ShlyKBMT said:

Flanigan was unaware that Livingston was added until I just messaged him. I'm sure BISD will be getting involved.

I would think they would force Central and WB to play week 1.

Yea, more than I want...

[RaiderGirl2010]

Ugh hate the drive to Livingston 

[wo-76]

This may open door for WOS.Huffman Navasota and Cleveland will need a non distict game.Also teams in 5A that lost a non district game.

[WOSgrad]

1 minute ago, wo-76 said:

This may open door for WOS.Huffman Navasota and Cleveland will need a non distict game.Also teams in 5A that lost a non district game.

WO-S is looking for Week 5, so Huffman, Navasota and Cleveland are possible ones.

[WOSgrad]

Will there, aside from Livingston being moved back up to 5A, be any sanctions against Livingston for turning in the wrong snap shot numbers?

[ST413]

Good question was wondering that myself.

[BMTSoulja1]

26 minutes ago, RaiderGirl2010 said:

Ugh hate the drive to Livingston 

This!  I hate it!

[RaiderRed30]

30 minutes ago, WOSgrad said:

WO-S is looking for Week 5, so Huffman, Navasota and Cleveland are possible ones.

Navasota WO-S, yes please.

26 minutes ago, WOSgrad said:

Will there, aside from Livingston being moved back up to 5A, be any sanctions against Livingston for turning in the wrong snap shot numbers?

I was wondering about TEA. I thought the numbers UIL used were what the districts turned into TEA for money. If they falsified records, then TEA could go after them for money they received that they should not have necessarily received.

[ST413]

And one of th views of one student is that the superintendent "lied".

[Guest]

2 minutes ago, ST413 said:

And one of th views of one student is that the superintendent "lied".

I have heard of this happening a time or two before around these parts. May come back and bite them in the butt.

[WOSgrad]

7 minutes ago, RaiderRed30 said:

I was wondering about TEA. I thought the numbers UIL used were what the districts turned into TEA for money. If they falsified records, then TEA could go after them for money they received that they should not have necessarily received.

That is my understanding as well.  But it is also that my understanding that their funding would have been less under the numbers that they turned in as opposed to the real numbers.  Sounds like somebody just cut off their nose despite their face.

[coachhooker01]

2 hours ago, RaiderRed30 said:

Tried to say travel, even through the district they wanted was actually further. Their new district has Lampasas, Liberty Hill, Burnet, Salado, and Taylor.

Yes I looked it but and scratched my head on that doesn't matter the bus doesn't go very fast goof up the hills anyways and either way you go you have a good chance to hit a deer

[oldschool2]

2 hours ago, WOSgrad said:

Will there, aside from Livingston being moved back up to 5A, be any sanctions against Livingston for turning in the wrong snap shot numbers?

If nothing happens to Livingston...I would turn in 10% less on every snapshot from now on.  Might as well chance it if nothing happens..

[Pepper Brooks]

Livingston just went from a chance to making the playoffs in 4A to virtually no shot in 5A