oldschool2 Posted March 1, 2016 Report Share Posted March 1, 2016 Is there going to be any kind of consequence for the fact that they turned in fewer numbers than they really had? Didn't that kind of mess up several pre-season schedules? Or is it going to be "swept under the rug" and treated as tho they didn't mean to do it? Just curious. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WOSgrad Posted March 1, 2016 Report Share Posted March 1, 2016 2 minutes ago, oldschool2 said: Is there going to be any kind of consequence for the fact that they turned in fewer numbers than they really had? Didn't that kind of mess up several pre-season schedules? Or is it going to be "swept under the rug" and treated as tho they didn't mean to do it? Just curious. I have heard that further sanctions might be coming down the pike for Livingston, but nothing definite. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BS Wildcats Posted March 1, 2016 Report Share Posted March 1, 2016 42 minutes ago, WOSgrad said: I have heard that further sanctions might be coming down the pike for Livingston, but nothing definite. Could be substantial Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WOSgrad Posted March 1, 2016 Report Share Posted March 1, 2016 Just now, BS Wildcats said: Could be substantial The potential sanctions could be very substantial. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BS Wildcats Posted March 1, 2016 Report Share Posted March 1, 2016 Just now, WOSgrad said: The potential sanctions could be very substantial. That is what I am hearing Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oldschool2 Posted March 1, 2016 Author Report Share Posted March 1, 2016 3 minutes ago, BS Wildcats said: Could be substantial Should be. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AthleticSupporter - Jock Posted March 1, 2016 Report Share Posted March 1, 2016 4 minutes ago, WOSgrad said: The potential sanctions could be very substantial. Like what, no playoffs? And they must surrender all playoff wins from the last 5 seasons? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CardinalBacker Posted March 1, 2016 Report Share Posted March 1, 2016 Just being from Livingston is penalty enough. Scatright 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted March 1, 2016 Report Share Posted March 1, 2016 1 minute ago, CardinalBacker said: Just being from Livingston is penalty enough. babababaaaahahahahahahaha Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BS Wildcats Posted March 1, 2016 Report Share Posted March 1, 2016 2 minutes ago, CardinalBacker said: Just being from Livingston is penalty enough. C'mon man CardinalBacker 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scatright Posted March 1, 2016 Report Share Posted March 1, 2016 They're going to enact a postseason ban and take 10 scholarships away from the Lions! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
idk Posted March 1, 2016 Report Share Posted March 1, 2016 you guys realize that the only ones that will suffer are the kids who had nothing to do with it. It was wrong, but why is it the kids have to pay for what some adults decided to do? Trocket and bleedblue 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BS Wildcats Posted March 1, 2016 Report Share Posted March 1, 2016 8 minutes ago, idk said: you guys realize that the only ones that will suffer are the kids who had nothing to do with it. It was wrong, but why is it the kids have to pay for what some adults decided to do? Yep Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RaiderRed30 Posted March 1, 2016 Report Share Posted March 1, 2016 I read the letter from the Superintendent. I understand that it was illegal, but at the same time should students that are never going to be eligible for UIL competitions be counted as a part of the schools attendance? I mean this for all schools. For the schools that are close to dropping it could help the students that can play or participate in UIL. If the Superintendent did turn in the number on accident because he or she did not know the actual rule on Alternative Placement students then I do not think their should be punishment. If he or she did then something, but nothing against the students who did not know better. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MAYFIELD Posted March 1, 2016 Report Share Posted March 1, 2016 1 hour ago, MOSSHILL said: babababaaaahahahahahahaha That was low Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
outanup Posted March 1, 2016 Report Share Posted March 1, 2016 Punishment should be all away games for their stay in 22-5a...... RaiderGirl2010 and Tigers2010 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted March 2, 2016 Report Share Posted March 2, 2016 5 hours ago, MAYFIELD said: That was low very low Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Uncle Pig Posted March 2, 2016 Report Share Posted March 2, 2016 18 hours ago, idk said: you guys realize that the only ones that will suffer are the kids who had nothing to do with it. It was wrong, but why is it the kids have to pay for what some adults decided to do? +1 Trocket 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oldschool2 Posted March 2, 2016 Author Report Share Posted March 2, 2016 22 hours ago, idk said: you guys realize that the only ones that will suffer are the kids who had nothing to do with it. It was wrong, but why is it the kids have to pay for what some adults decided to do? Almost sounds like some decisions that oughta get one or more people fired. Trocket and Tigers2010 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RaiderRed30 Posted March 3, 2016 Report Share Posted March 3, 2016 Seems like part of their punishment is their district. According to the latest UIL alignments, 2 other schools were affected by their new numbers. Livingston has been placed in 22-5A for all sports Baytown Lee has been moved to 21-5A in every sport except football (it will remain 22-5A for that) Caney Creek has been moved to 20-5A in every sport except football (it will remain 21-5A for that) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Red Dawn Posted March 19, 2016 Report Share Posted March 19, 2016 On March 2, 2016 at 5:14 PM, RaiderRed30 said: Seems like part of their punishment is their district. According to the latest UIL alignments, 2 other schools were affected by their new numbers. Livingston has been placed in 22-5A for all sports Baytown Lee has been moved to 21-5A in every sport except football (it will remain 22-5A for that) Caney Creek has been moved to 20-5A in every sport except football (it will remain 21-5A for that) Yep. Not sure how 21-5A getting 10 teams in all sports except football is fair. Why create an 8 & 10 team district? Why not two 9 team districts? bleedblue 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RaiderRed30 Posted March 19, 2016 Report Share Posted March 19, 2016 59 minutes ago, Red Dawn said: Yep. Not sure how 21-5A getting 10 teams in all sports except football is fair. Why create an 8 & 10 team district? Why not two 9 team districts? 10 teams is easier than 9 for scheduling. Was surprised at first Caney Creek was going to change but UIL smartly reversed course within a week. With a 9 team district you play everyone twice for 16 district games over 18 dates. That is a lot of games and in baseball and softball, it is every possible game but one. With a 10 team district, the teams are divided into two zones and play the teams in their zone twice and the other zone once. This equals 13 district games over 13 dates. Much easier for other sports with game limits, plus no byes. If the district teams choose to they can play a 14th game between the 1st place teams for district championship, 2 and 3 cross zone for the 3rd and 4th playoff spot, and then 4 and 5 would play each other. I Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Red Dawn Posted March 21, 2016 Report Share Posted March 21, 2016 On March 19, 2016 at 2:13 PM, RaiderRed30 said: 10 teams is easier than 9 for scheduling. Was surprised at first Caney Creek was going to change but UIL smartly reversed course within a week. With a 9 team district you play everyone twice for 16 district games over 18 dates. That is a lot of games and in baseball and softball, it is every possible game but one. With a 10 team district, the teams are divided into two zones and play the teams in their zone twice and the other zone once. This equals 13 district games over 13 dates. Much easier for other sports with game limits, plus no byes. If the district teams choose to they can play a 14th game between the 1st place teams for district championship, 2 and 3 cross zone for the 3rd and 4th playoff spot, and then 4 and 5 would play each other. I Nice reply. I see what your saying and agree with you. Thanks for your insight. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.