Hagar Posted March 27, 2016 Report Posted March 27, 2016 25 minutes ago, Englebert said: I completely forgot to follow up on this topic. I'm conflicted. Geraldo Rivera stated on national TV that the National Enquirer has a reputation for being correct on political stories. Bamatex stated "it's worth noting that the Enquirer is rarely wrong when it breaks the news on political figures' affairs". Westend1 stated "there have been enough baseless allegations against those two [Hillary and Obama] to choke a horse" when referring to the Enquirer. So based on these statements, am I to believe that since the Enquirer is rarely wrong on political matters, that all of the baseless allegations are actually true about Hillary and Obama? Or is the truth really that the Enquirer engages in yellow journalism and gets lucky every once in a while? Someone please enlighten me because I know zero about the National Enquirer. It's ironic that this story was started by the NE, yet I doubt any of us ever read it because we know it to be male bovine feces 99% of the time (except the story about the three headed alien who abducted a whole town in western Montana- that was real). Englebert 1 Quote
LumRaiderFan Posted March 27, 2016 Report Posted March 27, 2016 5 hours ago, Englebert said: I completely forgot to follow up on this topic. I'm conflicted. Geraldo Rivera stated on national TV that the National Enquirer has a reputation for being correct on political stories. Bamatex stated "it's worth noting that the Enquirer is rarely wrong when it breaks the news on political figures' affairs". Westend1 stated "there have been enough baseless allegations against those two [Hillary and Obama] to choke a horse" when referring to the Enquirer. So based on these statements, am I to believe that since the Enquirer is rarely wrong on political matters, that all of the baseless allegations are actually true about Hillary and Obama? Or is the truth really that the Enquirer engages in yellow journalism and gets lucky every once in a while? Someone please enlighten me because I know zero about the National Enquirer. Just pick one that's convenient. Englebert 1 Quote
westend1 Posted March 27, 2016 Report Posted March 27, 2016 This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up I don't know but here is what I found in about 2 seconds. Englebert 1 Quote
baddog Posted March 28, 2016 Report Posted March 28, 2016 19 minutes ago, westend1 said: This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up I don't know but here is what I found in about 2 seconds. Lol. I like the one where the caption is "Obama Caught in the Act". Look how long his arms are! Hagar 1 Quote
Hagar Posted March 28, 2016 Report Posted March 28, 2016 57 minutes ago, westend1 said: This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up I don't know but here is what I found in about 2 seconds. Thanks we1. I knew it was trashy, but this link was over the top. I'm no legal expert, but how they stay in business is beyond me. I'd think they'd be up to their a-- in lawsuits. Quote
Mr.Green Jeans Posted March 28, 2016 Report Posted March 28, 2016 (edited) I do not post a lot on this site about politics. Ted Cruz clams to be a person to stand for Civil, and Christian liberties. So I ask the question how can he be so supportive of the Kountze Cheerleading case, and never support, or for that matter never mention nor demand any justice for the Kountze Church Burning? And to stay on the subject what politician Local, State, or Federal has demanded justice for the burning of the church? Edited March 28, 2016 by Mr.Green Jeans Words left out Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.