Capone Posted April 24, 2016 Report Posted April 24, 2016 Runs a 10.34 100, smoking! BADSANTA and camsdad 2 Quote
IT'S IN THE BONE Posted April 24, 2016 Report Posted April 24, 2016 That makes fast look not so fast! Lol Quote
Morris_era Posted April 25, 2016 Report Posted April 25, 2016 7 hours ago, Capone said: Runs a 10.34 100, smoking! Fastest time I seen for him was 10.8....but I could be wrong Quote
dayton Posted April 25, 2016 Report Posted April 25, 2016 That's a very impressive time. I'm doubtful that it was FAT though. Just not that many sub 10.6 guys out there. Â He ran 10.80 at Texas Relays... That's a huge drop in the 100m Quote
wosfan1992 Posted April 25, 2016 Report Posted April 25, 2016 FAT he ran a 10.8 at area. Read it on some website. The 10.3 was handtime. Still impressive Quote
dayton Posted April 25, 2016 Report Posted April 25, 2016 1 minute ago, wosfan1992 said: FAT he ran a 10.8 at area. Read it on some website. The 10.3 was handtime. Still impressive This is a good lesson on how inaccurate handtimes can be... If you use the standard conversion (round to nearest tenth and add .24), it puts him at a 10.64, which is still way off from 10.8. That being said, 10.8 is flat out flying in my book. Quote
AthleticSupporter - Jock Posted April 25, 2016 Report Posted April 25, 2016 2 minutes ago, dayton said: This is a good lesson on how inaccurate handtimes can be... If you use the standard conversion (round to nearest tenth and add .24), it puts him at a 10.64, which is still way off from 10.8. That being said, 10.8 is flat out flying in my book. 10.8 is especially impressive considering that top-end speed is not what makes Grayland "elite".  I'll take Grayland's speed, quickness, change of direction, etc on a football field over a 10.2 track star any day.  HOTROD309 1 Quote
dayton Posted April 25, 2016 Report Posted April 25, 2016 1 minute ago, AthleticSupporter - Jock said: 10.8 is especially impressive considering that top-end speed is not what makes Grayland "elite". Â I'll take Grayland's speed, quickness, change of direction, etc on a football field over a 10.2 track star any day. Â Well said. IT'S IN THE BONE 1 Quote
IT'S IN THE BONE Posted April 25, 2016 Report Posted April 25, 2016 20 minutes ago, dayton said: Well said. ditto Quote
Capone Posted April 25, 2016 Author Report Posted April 25, 2016 That 10.8 was at district meet and he wasn't 100%. He ran 10.34 at area meet this past Friday. Quote
wosfan1992 Posted April 25, 2016 Report Posted April 25, 2016 51 minutes ago, Capone said: That 10.8 was at district meet and he wasn't 100%. He ran 10.34 at area meet this past Friday. He ran a 10.99 at district and a 10.8 at area. The 10.3 was hand time Quote
Capone Posted April 25, 2016 Author Report Posted April 25, 2016 Your right but he ran 10.8 March 30th I think. Where does it say he ran a 10.8 at area? Quote
wosfan1992 Posted April 25, 2016 Report Posted April 25, 2016 it was on some website. I'll have to find it Quote
BADSANTA Posted April 25, 2016 Report Posted April 25, 2016 How does WOS track team look this year? Quote
Morris_era Posted April 25, 2016 Report Posted April 25, 2016 1 hour ago, BADSANTA said: How does WOS track team look this year? They won district Quote
wosfan1992 Posted April 25, 2016 Report Posted April 25, 2016 2 hours ago, BADSANTA said: How does WOS track team look this year? Pretty good. Just really young but they're state contenders Quote
Capone Posted April 26, 2016 Author Report Posted April 26, 2016 This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up What are these results for? Quote
ST413 Posted April 26, 2016 Report Posted April 26, 2016 Just what it says the area meet that was held last Friday. Quote
DeuceSixSuited Posted April 26, 2016 Report Posted April 26, 2016 A lot of hate towards the young man. He ran what he ran.... Congrats and keep pushing young fella! 10.34 is blazing!! I believe he got 1st in the area track meet? He can't help that it wasn't FAT... Quote
dayton Posted April 26, 2016 Report Posted April 26, 2016 40 minutes ago, bradyb said: A lot of hate towards the young man. He ran what he ran.... Congrats and keep pushing young fella! 10.34 is blazing!! I believe he got 1st in the area track meet? He can't help that it wasn't FAT... There has been no hate towards him. The kid is a burner on the track and a stud on the football field. Plain and simple... a 10.34 hand time isn't a 10.34. Just like all the hand timed 4.3 40yd dashes in HS football aren't legit either. Folks that care about track and accurate results are gonna call out results that aren't legit every single time. Cougar14.2 and About a week ago 2 Quote
DeuceSixSuited Posted April 26, 2016 Report Posted April 26, 2016 lol OK ! Again, Great job on your 10.34 100m Dash G!! Keep pushing! dayton 1 Quote
PlayActionPass Posted April 26, 2016 Report Posted April 26, 2016 Why would anybody host an Area meet and not have FAT times? Does not make sense, especially since there are Wild Card spots in the state meet up for grabs. dayton and About a week ago 2 Quote
dayton Posted April 26, 2016 Report Posted April 26, 2016 10 minutes ago, PlayActionPass said: Why would anybody host an Area meet and not have FAT times? Does not make sense, especially since there are Wild Card spots in the state meet up for grabs. they've got to go to regionals before state. The regional sites will be FAT. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.