Hagar Posted May 5, 2016 Report Posted May 5, 2016 No shame here. Sneaky sneaky sneaky This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up Quote
nappyroots Posted May 5, 2016 Report Posted May 5, 2016 obama hasn't taken your guns in 7 yrs, so I guess he will get them in the next 7 months........just motivating the followers Quote
5GallonBucket Posted May 5, 2016 Report Posted May 5, 2016 9 hours ago, nappyroots said: obama hasn't taken your guns in 7 yrs, so I guess he will get them in the next 7 months........just motivating the followers leftist are smart in trying to gain ground by taking small bits here and there Quote
JWB Posted May 5, 2016 Report Posted May 5, 2016 Snake in the grass....can't wait until he's out of the white house....... Quote
LumRaiderFan Posted May 5, 2016 Report Posted May 5, 2016 9 hours ago, nappyroots said: obama hasn't taken your guns in 7 yrs, so I guess he will get them in the next 7 months........just motivating the followers There you go...move along citizen...nothing to see here...Obama/Clinton wants more of you. You keep worrying about Cruz, who is not even in it anymore, putting too much prayer in schools...very dangerous. 77 and jv_coach 2 Quote
Hagar Posted May 6, 2016 Author Report Posted May 6, 2016 11 hours ago, LumRaiderFan said: There you go...move along citizen...nothing to see here...Obama/Clinton wants more of you. You keep worrying about Cruz, who is not even in it anymore, putting too much prayer in schools...very dangerous. Right LRF, the morals, and crime situation in our country have improved dramatically since we got rid of prayer in schools. Yep, proofs in the pudding. Quote
tvc184 Posted May 6, 2016 Report Posted May 6, 2016 13 hours ago, JWB said: Snake in the grass....can't wait until he's out of the white house....... But he is likely to be replaced by the snakette in the grass who may be worse. 77 1 Quote
Hagar Posted May 6, 2016 Author Report Posted May 6, 2016 15 minutes ago, tvc184 said: But he is likely to be replaced by the snakette in the grass who may be worse. With her it's all about the money. It's possible that if Colt, Winchester, and a few others can get a few million in her hands, she'll back off. Of course if Soros & other leftist pay more, we're fudged. Quote
nappyroots Posted May 9, 2016 Report Posted May 9, 2016 On May 5, 2016 at 7:51 AM, LumRaiderFan said: There you go...move along citizen...nothing to see here...Obama/Clinton wants more of you. You keep worrying about Cruz, who is not even in it anymore, putting too much prayer in schools...very dangerous. Cruz doesn't give a four letter word about religion, he just uses it to further his agenda with the devil Quote
nappyroots Posted May 9, 2016 Report Posted May 9, 2016 America was dealing with gun control in the 1800s, their were signs in wichita kansas before entering town stating to leave your guns at police headquarters. Same in dodge city also. tighter gun restrictions has always been a problem in this society. Quote
RETIREDFAN1 Posted May 9, 2016 Report Posted May 9, 2016 the only way anyone is going to get your guns is if you give them to them peacefully because you'd rather have a comfortable life of slavery and servitude than to be a FREE man........ Quote
baddog Posted May 9, 2016 Report Posted May 9, 2016 8 hours ago, nappyroots said: America was dealing with gun control in the 1800s, their were signs in wichita kansas before entering town stating to leave your guns at police headquarters. Same in dodge city also. tighter gun restrictions has always been a problem in this society. That was when the cattlemen came to town and Earp disarming a bunch of outlaws. All of their guns were returned.....even the outlaws. That is not the case here. Keep crying though. It helps so much. Quote
nappyroots Posted May 21, 2016 Report Posted May 21, 2016 Why not cut all restrictions and let anyone buy whatever gun or ammo that want at anytime. Lets stop inspecting planes and food products, drinking water and medical facilities also. Since chemical plants and refinerys are supplying good jobs, let them do whatever they want without any government restrictions, lets not hold them back. Lets not take away any rights from anybody. Quote
tvc184 Posted May 21, 2016 Report Posted May 21, 2016 17 minutes ago, nappyroots said: Why not cut all restrictions and let anyone buy whatever gun or ammo that want at anytime. Lets stop inspecting planes and food products, drinking water and medical facilities also. Since chemical plants and refinerys are supplying good jobs, let them do whatever they want without any government restrictions, lets not hold them back. Lets not take away any rights from anybody. I never noticed where jobs, medicine, drinking water, chemicals, driving, modes of transportation, etc, we're mentioned in the Constitution as specific rights. Maybe you can point out my oversight. Freedom of speech, assembly, religion, right to an attorney, public trial, bearing arms, free from unreasonable searches and seizures, along with a few others are specifically stated as rights. i know that concept escapes you. Englebert 1 Quote
LumRaiderFan Posted May 22, 2016 Report Posted May 22, 2016 lol...keeps removing all doubt. 77 1 Quote
nappyroots Posted May 22, 2016 Report Posted May 22, 2016 Nobody"s coming for yall's guns, stop spending all your money on guns and ammo. Take a vacation instead! Quote
77 Posted May 22, 2016 Report Posted May 22, 2016 Ole nappy got them marchin orders and talkin points down another good soldier for the liberal left that hate our way of life! Quote
nappyroots Posted May 29, 2016 Report Posted May 29, 2016 Obama has't got enough time left to take your guns!!!! If trump becomes president guns sales will drop dramatically, NRA probably wants hillary to win ........Hillary is coming for your guns folks Quote
tvc184 Posted May 30, 2016 Report Posted May 30, 2016 The CA senate just pass a bill that keeps a gun with a detachable magazine from being reloaded without tools to take it apart. They are like the frog in the boiling water. Heat it slow so he doesn't notice rather than toss him into hot water and letting him jump out. No, they don't want our guns. They are fine with us using flintlocks .... for now. 77 and LumRaiderFan 2 Quote
nappyroots Posted May 30, 2016 Report Posted May 30, 2016 Guns will NEVER be taken away, just a tool for talk radio and Hannity to keep getting paid Quote
Englebert Posted May 30, 2016 Report Posted May 30, 2016 1 hour ago, nappyroots said: Guns will NEVER be taken away, just a tool for talk radio and Hannity to keep getting paid You've never answered the question I've posed to you earlier. What does Hillary mean when she says she wants to hold gun manufacturers responsible in cases of gun violence? Then let's hear your educated response to TVC's post right before. Then let's hear your response to the Congressman that wants to ban guns for anyone that is going through a divorce. Then let's hear your response to Diane Feinstein's assertion that all returning military personnel should not be allowed to own guns. There are tons and tons more evidence of liberals wanting to take your guns than of Dick Cheney going to war to make money. When Republicans proposed having to show identification when voting, liberals went nuts saying that Republicans are taking away the right to vote for millions of people. They starting spouting off about Jim Crow Laws and echoing of poll taxes. But when it comes to the second amendment...whoa, now that's a situation that needs to be heavily regulated by enlightened people. You should have to be identified, studied through background checks, and pay heavy taxes to exercise that right. Just imagine what questions would be asked on background checks if Cass Sunstein was in charge of writing them. baddog and Hagar 2 Quote
LumRaiderFan Posted May 31, 2016 Report Posted May 31, 2016 7 hours ago, Englebert said: You've never answered the question I've posed to you earlier. What does Hillary mean when she says she wants to hold gun manufacturers responsible in cases of gun violence? Then let's hear your educated response to TVC's post right before. Then let's hear your response to the Congressman that wants to ban guns for anyone that is going through a divorce. Then let's hear your response to Diane Feinstein's assertion that all returning military personnel should not be allowed to own guns. There are tons and tons more evidence of liberals wanting to take your guns than of Dick Cheney going to war to make money. When Republicans proposed having to show identification when voting, liberals went nuts saying that Republicans are taking away the right to vote for millions of people. They starting spouting off about Jim Crow Laws and echoing of poll taxes. But when it comes to the second amendment...whoa, now that's a situation that needs to be heavily regulated by enlightened people. You should have to be identified, studied through background checks, and pay heavy taxes to exercise that right. Just imagine what questions would be asked on background checks if Cass Sunstein was in charge of writing them. hmmm...no answer yet. Quote
Hagar Posted June 2, 2016 Author Report Posted June 2, 2016 Didn't mean to post this. The devil made me do it. This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up 77 1 Quote
nappyroots Posted June 3, 2016 Report Posted June 3, 2016 I guess once Obama is out of office we can stop talking about the second amendment, we never talked about it before. Hannity uses it as a tool to keep his show on Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.