Jump to content

Thank You MR. Cavness


5GallonBucket

Recommended Posts

15 minutes ago, gohornets23 said:

sorry...don't get much time in front of the computer

yes I'd have no problem with a transgender woman going to the same bathroom as my daughter (who is four) at the same time

I'd be much more wary of letting my son who (7) spend time alone with a priest 

 

Lol, you must not spend much time, you didn't answer the question.   As for as your prejudice comment about Priest, the percentage of Priest identified as pedofiles, is lower than the general population as a whole.  So, you accept the transgender over the Priest, how sad.  I will pray for you.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 hours ago, stevenash said:

Okay Lum, I'll give you my answer.  All of us are human and one of our COMMON DENOMINATORS is the uneasiness to change.   You people have a history of being scared of change. Yall get bent out of shape and (sometimes) carry things too far. Your people allow fear , prejudice, etc to rule your thoughts and actions.  So , you are saying because a person who is physically a man but identifies a woman is going to rape little girls in the bathroom? Hmmm, your logic sounds eerily familiar to some other past transgenders ...err... transgressions recorded throughout history.

 

IT WOULD APPEAR YOU ARE TALKING ABOUT MORE THAN BATHROOM LINES!!!

YEP!!   CHANGE

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, LumRaiderFan said:

What a shame...you have no problem with it, don't seem to worry if your daughter would.

That's where my concern lies (with the kids) and it seems Dr. Cavness as well.

Have to agree with Whoa...awful strange that you feel your kids are safer in the presence of someone obviously confused about what they are than a Priest.

Remember LRF, your question involved a transgender man, not a transgender women.  We'll have to wait for that answer.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 hours ago, LumRaiderFan said:

These guys seem to be only concerned with the transgender...not worried at all how it will affect the children.

Grown men and grown women (transgender or not) have no business in a bathroom or locker room with children of the opposite sex...period.

Speaking of women in the locker room, I seem to remember you people were a little upset about that issue. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, REBgp said:

Lol, you must not spend much time, you didn't answer the question.   As for as your prejudice comment about Priest, the percentage of Priest identified as pedofiles, is lower than the general population as a whole.  So, you accept the transgender over the Priest, how sad.  I will pray for you.

Anybody have data on transgender pedophiles? Maybe the data will show their population is below the general population as well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 5/17/2016 at 9:12 PM, REBgp said:

I think BD3, that one thing most of us are concerned about is a pervert, who preys on young girls, who claims to be a transgender so he can access the girls bathroom.   

Personally, I wouldn't have a problem sharing a bathroom with a transgender.  My main concern is my wife, daughter, and granddaughter.

Huh? Man your  prejudices are seeping through this thread. So, maybe the real reason here is that a person who is different from you, which makes you feel uncomfortable because they are different, qualifies them to be put on the pervert list. So, your scenario is that we are going to get an increase of transgenders preying on the young. 

Secondly, you want to give us this movie script of perverts dressing as women to access the girl's restroom & prey on young girls.

:  
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, LumRaiderFan said:

Still no answer...you people???...hmmm.

You people is meant to be derogatory, it shows prejudice, is racist, profiling, and stereotyping......Everything he is supposedly against, yet there it is. Like I said, two faced.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, BLUEDOVE3 said:

Huh? Man your  prejudices are seeping through this thread. So, maybe the real reason here is that a person who is different from you, which makes you feel uncomfortable because they are different, qualifies them to be put on the pervert list. So, your scenario is that we are going to get an increase of transgenders preying on the young. 

Secondly, you want to give us this movie script of perverts dressing as women to access the girl's restroom & prey on young girls.

:  

I'm surprised at you Dove.  You usually read a post before replying.   Maybe you ought to re-read mine.  Either that, are your prejudices are seeping through.  I tried to reply in a sensible, reasonable manner.  I don't have problems with transgenders if they are born that way.

Secondly, I never heard (not that it's never happened) of perverts cross dressing to go in girls bathrooms.   This decree will give Any man the right to go into a girls bathroom, no matter how they're dressed.  They won't have to dress as a woman.  Jeans and cowboy boots.  Three piece suit.  Who's going to ask them if they're TG?   You?  Me?   If we do, we'd probably get sued as LGBTphobes.   If you can answer that problem with a sensible, reasonable response, it'll alleviate my fears. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, REBgp said:

I'm surprised at you Dove.  You usually read a post before replying.   Maybe you ought to re-read mine.  Either that, are your prejudices are seeping through.  I tried to reply in a sensible, reasonable manner.  I don't have problems with transgenders if they are born that way.

Secondly, I never heard (not that it's never happened) of perverts cross dressing to go in girls bathrooms.   This decree will give Any man the right to go into a girls bathroom, no matter how they're dressed.  They won't have to dress as a woman.  Jeans and cowboy boots.  Three piece suit.  Who's going to ask them if they're TG?   You?  Me?   If we do, we'd probably get sued as LGBTphobes.   If you can answer that problem with a sensible, reasonable response, it'll alleviate my fears. 

I read your post :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, NDNation said:

So if you go into the DMV and you have male parts but you associate as a female, will they list female on your drivers license?

No, they didn't list it on their birth certificate, don't expect it on any other official form. What they don't get to choose is their sex...what they get to choose is how to act. 

On this subject, I am aware that some people (very very very few) ARE actually born with BOTH sexual organs....now those are the ones, the ONLY ones we should be discussing.

Just because you identify better with a group that you weren't born as, doesn't mean you become that....some blacks are accused of being "to white" (whatever that means) for identifying with what some believe to be white ideals. This doesn't make them white, or not black enough...it's just what they believe. They can't change their birth certificates, they can't check the "white" box under race. They can even bleach themselves (Michael Jackson) and it still DOES NOT make them white....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, CraigS said:

No, they didn't list it on their birth certificate, don't expect it on any other official form. What they don't get to choose is their sex...what they get to choose is how to act. 

On this subject, I am aware that some people (very very very few) ARE actually born with BOTH sexual organs....now those are the ones, the ONLY ones we should be discussing.

Just because you identify better with a group that you weren't born as, doesn't mean you become that....some blacks are accused of being "to white" (whatever that means) for identifying with what some believe to be white ideals. This doesn't make them white, or not black enough...it's just what they believe. They can't change their birth certificates, they can't check the "white" box under race. They can even bleach themselves (Michael Jackson) and it still DOES NOT make them white....

This is what I'm getting at. If its not getting changed on official documents, why is it being changed in bathrooms that kids use?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, stevenash said:

Dove, should Rachel Dolezal have been able to change her ethnic identity on her drivers license  and other official records?  After all, this is what she felt she was.

I can give one example FOR SURE I had a 11th grader enroll who was 100% black-  no doubt about it -   and mom said he was anglo  so that's what the Counselor's  did

put down the race they stated which was obviously wrong

don't know how the DMV or jail would view it

Link to comment
Share on other sites

41 minutes ago, Whoa said:

I can give one example FOR SURE I had a 11th grader enroll who was 100% black-  no doubt about it -   and mom said he was anglo  so that's what the Counselor's  did

put down the race they stated which was obviously wrong

don't know how the DMV or jail would view it

In most cases, the school admins are as dumb as the fed gov....that's why Cavness and company standing up for the "normal" people is such appreciated.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, BLUEDOVE3 said:

Yall fishing now.

I look at it as the government trying to throw them a bone without REALLY having to deal with it. Just let them use whatever restroom they want, but it's not OFFICIAL if they can't change it on Official and government documents. So why are we even doing this?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Craig, I must ask do you really believe Admin are dumb?  By definition you must have at least a Masters.  I know it is popular for rednecks to dog teachers, admin, etc...but disagree in a somewhat intelligent manner.

Showing your a#%

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Whoa said:

Craig, I must ask do you really believe Admin are dumb?  By definition you must have at least a Masters.  I know it is popular for rednecks to dog teachers, admin, etc...but disagree in a somewhat intelligent manner.

Showing your a#%

So is disagreeing with someone in an intelligent manner entail throwing out racial slurs?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Whoa said:

Craig, I must ask do you really believe Admin are dumb?  By definition you must have at least a Masters.  I know it is popular for rednecks to dog teachers, admin, etc...but disagree in a somewhat intelligent manner.

Showing your a#%

Plenty of formally educated people that are void of common sense/logic , especially at the Federal level.  And part of their problem is the true belief that they know so much more about what is good for the average guy as opposed to the average guy knowing what is good for himself.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, LumRaiderFan said:

This is the hidden content, please

So which bathroom would Caitlyn Bruce use when this happens...so confusing.

 

I'm getting confused. Is Bruce transgender or transsexual? Does he still have man parts and taking hormones to grow breasts? Isn't transgender just feeling like you're the opposite sex? Like Shiloh Pitt.

I can see a man that has transitioned into a woman using the ladies room. I can't see a man that just feels like a woman using the ladies room.

Wow, look how far humans have come, we can just change our sex.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Member Statistics

    46,206
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    Ceb2000
    Newest Member
    Ceb2000
    Joined



  • Posts

    • Like I said, even if it’s only 10% of the 100 kids BHISD takes from GCCISD each year, that’s 10 athletes per year and that’s being generous.  You’re right about the jobs with BHISD, BTW.  There’s more than 1 athlete from Baytown originally who got transferred to BHISD after a job opened up for Mama.
    • Here’s a link to another story about it This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up
    • It’s behind a paywall but here’s Baytown Sun’s story on it.  It was reported on in other papers statewide so if you search by the date I think you’ll find other stories on it. UIL strengthens student transfer rules By Ron McDowell [email protected] Oct 18, 2024   In order to maintain a level playing field for all member schools, the University Interscholastic League strengthened rules regarding transfer student eligibility at its most recent meeting in Austin. Every year thousands of students transfer schools in the state of Texas. A student’s ability to participate in UIL sanctioned activities may be limited base on the reasons for the transfer. A change in family status, work transfers, enrollment in an academic magnet program, or a move across town, receive scrutiny, but only rarely does one of these reasons result in the loss of eligibility. The only reason to automatically cause the loss of participation eligibility is a transfer for athletic purposes. The current rule, which has been in place since 1981, does not require a Previous Athletic Participation Form (PAPFs) to be submitted if the student-athlete does not participate in a varsity level sport during the first year of enrollment. There has been growing concern among some member schools, that other members are breaking the current rule and creating “super teams” with new transfer enrollees, and that the UIL is not doing enough to police, what appear to be, the inordinate number of transfers among high school athletes. To mitigate these concerns, the UIL approved a proposal to expand the power of the State Executive Committee (SEC) and allow it to investigate schools based upon the number of PAPFs submitted. Schools that submit an inordinate number of PAPFs would face heightened scrutiny and possible public reprimand and future sanctions. The UIL has also changed the requirements for PAPF submission, mandating that the form be submitted before a grade 9-12 transfer student may participate at any level of school athletics. This is a marked departure from the current policy which encourages schools not to complete PAPFs for students who transfer in, if the school believes that the student will not play a varsity sport in the first year the student is enrolled at the new school. Some critics of the current system think that the change doesn’t go far enough. Speaking on background, one local school district source suggested that there should be an automatic year wait for transfer students due to the number of loopholes in the waiver process. “If a student transfers, it should be a year out of competition automatically,” the source said. In addition, the UIL also approved a proposal that gives the SEC the power to appoint an independent administrator to oversee the conduct of the local District Executive Committee (DEC) if it is determined that the DEC is not consistently enforcing the rules of the governing body. The change is significant since all appeals that a school brings, starts and usually ends with the DEC. That includes the determination of transfer student eligibility. It is believed that with the implementation of this change, schools in a UIL district will be less likely to face retribution from the DEC chair and other members. The policy changes will go into effect, Aug. 1, 2025 This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up  
    • I was hoping WOS was going to win. To get another chance to redeem ourself. Silsbee did not look good in that game and has not played consistent during the season. Hopefully against La Vega they will play 4quarters of football
    • This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up   GCCISD paid a firm called PASA to compile this report ahead of them closing/consolidating some schools and redrawing attendance zones.
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...