Jump to content

WHY HILLARY IS SINKING FASTER THAN THE TITANTIC


Hagar

Recommended Posts

12 minutes ago, baddog said:

Personally, I wish both candidates would stop slinging mud and tell me what they are going to do about the economy, isis, illegal immigrants, Syrian refugees, oil glut, you know, real issues, not just constant name calling.

We both have a better chance at winning Powerball before that happens. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Also, this year may be the election that proves no third party will be a viable option in our lifetimes.  I have said before I identify with many of the Libertarian Party's stances.  And I must say their VP candidate has been one of my favorite Republicans for over a couple of decades.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, TxHoops said:

I never thought the GOP would be the mess it is now.  Trump is approaching a 70 percent disapproval rating in some polls.  Many politicos are predicting single women again being the key demographic.  If that plays out, Trump's candidacy will make the Titanic look like a Sunday afternoon sail...

Hoops, I think your description of the GOP as a "mess" was rather generous.  I'm afraid it's comparable to the British Army on the beaches at Dunkirk.  The fact that a rich, brash, historically liberal, businessman from NY (a yankee), won so many primaries in the "heart of dixie", is proof that Joe Repulican is not happy with the Party, or leadership.  Add to that the two best the Democrats had to offer, of Bernie (a socialist) and Hillary (a_______fill in the blank) and one has to wonder about the state of our politics.  Thirty years ago, Mr. Ed would have beaten all three of them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, 77 said:

My theory is that the GOP dont want to win the presidency because they know that usually the other party controls the  house and senate and therefore they would lose their jobs and we all know they (on both sides) are only concerned about themselves and their power.jmo

You may be on to something 77.  That never entered my mind.  But it has now lol :) 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, new tobie said:

report number 8 or 9

Tobie- Do you believe Mrs. Clinton and Susan Rice were honest with the public when they said the attack was a spontaneous response to a video?  Do you believe Mrs. Clinton was honest with the parents of those slain in Benghazi when she assured them we would "get the guy who produced that video'?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, stevenash said:

Tobie- Do you believe Mrs. Clinton and Susan Rice were honest with the public when they said the attack was a spontaneous response to a video?  Do you believe Mrs. Clinton was honest with the parents of those slain in Benghazi when she assured them we would "get the guy who produced that video'?

No and No. And you guys do a very good job of picking and choosing the things with government that you are concerned with and all of them are one-sided. Blame for 911 can probably be pointed at someone in our government. I read where warning signs were there, but were ignored.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, new tobie said:

No and No. And you guys do a very good job of picking and choosing the things with government that you are concerned with and all of them are one-sided. Blame for 911 can probably be pointed at someone in our government. I read where warning signs were there, but were ignored.

How can that be?  Weren't there a lot of smart Dems in the government at that time?  Did they miss/ignore those warning signs also?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

34 minutes ago, nappyroots said:

If we would have investigated our government, we probably would have some democrat and /or republicans in jail right now.

There's no doubt in my mind that, for whatever illegal shenanigans, there's a bunch of our politicians that need Orange jumpsuits.  There's a quote attributed to Ronald Reagan that would be appropriate here.

I use to say that Politics was the Second Oldest Profession, and I've come to know it bears a gross similarity to the First.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Member Statistics

    46,201
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    JBarry68
    Newest Member
    JBarry68
    Joined



  • Posts

    • naw, maaaaybe 7, definitely not 8 deep.  today im avoiding sitting by #10s parents, had to move away yesterday.   "put my son back in jub, put my son back in"  and then crying on every little touch of someone.    lets ball out today ktz!    
    • Very close game until the 2nd half (mostly the 4th) when Orangefield came unraveled. Worse defensive effort I have seen out of the Bobcats in three years. This team has to get back on D and quit getting beat over the top when pressing. Offensively, non ball handlers continually turn it over and their shot selection is poor. Basic basketball, such as: defensive hustle, boxing out, and taking care of the basketball are the areas the Bobcats need to work on most. Whitmire will get them on point, but he shouldn't have to coach effort at the Varsity Level.  We'll be at McNeese this Friday night at 6pm.
    • I don’t benefit from it, that’s not my area.  But the average cost to imprison someone is around $15k per year (on average in the US) and capital cases cost somewhere between $1.5-$3M with over half being overturned or reduced to life in prison anyway.  These numbers may be inflated since the last report I read but I’m sure it would be on both sides and higher on the DP side if anything. So what’s the point?  We feel better because we got to return the favor on someone (hopefully) who committed a heinous crime?  And I don’t know I can say we have “complicated” it. Which appeal should we cut out?  Our justice system has a pecking order and we have higher courts for a reason. When we are about to impose the ultimate judgment, should we cut steps that other cases have to save a buck?  Or do we not pay for an indigent person’s experts at the trial court level because it’s too expensive? Or do we just lock them up and throw away the key (unless we later find out they weren’t actually guilty, in which case we have a key and a life we haven’t unjustly ended) and save a ton of money?  Seems to me to be an obvious solution but I’m more of a pragmatist.
    • 1 thing for certain. Coach Earned 3 more years to figure it out lol
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...