Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Let me try another analogy. You're in the bottom of the 9th inning, 2 outs, bases loaded, down by 1 run. The batter is 0-20 lifetime with 20 strikeouts versus the pitcher on the mound. You have a hitter in the dugout that has never faced the current pitcher. Do you go with the batter, or use a substitute? I think I would sub.

Posted
4 minutes ago, Englebert said:

Let me try another analogy. You're in the bottom of the 9th inning, 2 outs, bases loaded, down by 1 run. The batter is 0-20 lifetime with 20 strikeouts versus the pitcher on the mound. You have a hitter in the dugout that has never faced the current pitcher. Do you go with the batter, or use a substitute? I think I would sub.

4th quarter down by two touchdowns, do you put the experience qb in Tom Brady or the rookie.........oh I see, if Romo was the experienced qb your better off with the rookie with no experience

Posted
2 minutes ago, nappyroots said:

4th quarter down by two touchdowns, do you put the experience qb in Tom Brady or the rookie.........oh I see, if Romo was the experienced qb your better off with the rookie with no experience

Now you're getting it.

Posted
1 hour ago, Yeoj said:

So in your opinion its Hillary that you are concerned with losing the country. That's actually laughable considering Trumps records of fraud, bad business dealings, lack of paying taxes, bankruptcies, and divorces. You would actually vote for a fool that is clearly not qualified to be president because of party lines. SMDH... 

Guess you didn't read the post where I had goggled, How many times has Trump been audited, & found he was currently audited & had been audited every year for the last 10 years.   When I goggled the same question for the Clintons, all I got was a list of Clinton's foes who had been audited, probably for political reasons.  Also, that "fool" is a multi-millionaire.  Made in business, unlike Hillary who gets her money from middle eastern countries, ergo, she's sold us out.  Plus the fact that that the Democratic Party is doing its best to turn our country to socialism/communism, yes, I'll vote for Trump.  I know there are faults in the Republican Party, you evidently ignore the faults of the Democrats, or you yourself are a Socialist.

Posted
20 minutes ago, Englebert said:

Experience is only helpful if one gains knowledge from that experience. Experience itself means absolutely nothing.

Love that last line. May I use it?

Kinda like being at work and just sitting on a bucket.

Posted
3 minutes ago, REBgp said:

Guess you didn't read the post where I had goggled, How many times has Trump been audited, & found he was currently audited & had been audited every year for the last 10 years.   When I goggled the same question for the Clintons, all I got was a list of Clinton's foes who had been audited, probably for political reasons.  Also, that "fool" is a multi-millionaire.  Made in business, unlike Hillary who gets her money from middle eastern countries, ergo, she's sold us out.  Plus the fact that that the Democratic Party is doing its best to turn our country to socialism/communism, yes, I'll vote for Trump.  I know there are faults in the Republican Party, you evidently ignore the faults of the Democrats, or you yourself are a Socialist.

If we start judging candidates by wealth, one of the koch brothers should run

This is the hidden content, please

Posted
31 minutes ago, Englebert said:

Experience is only helpful if one gains knowledge from that experience. Experience itself means absolutely nothing.

At my job dealing with dangerous chemicals, experience is better the majority of the time

Posted
41 minutes ago, Englebert said:

Experience is only helpful if one gains knowledge from that experience. Experience itself means absolutely nothing.

If Trump wins unemployment will drop to 0 when he cranks up the old war machine

Posted
Just now, new tobie said:

At my job dealing with dangerous chemicals, experience is better the majority of the time

Would you rather be working with someone that has 10 years of experience with 50 accidents on his record, or someone with 1 year of experience with no accidents? :)

Posted
2 hours ago, Englebert said:

Where is any proof that Trump has not paid "his fair share" of taxes. Oh right, Harry Reid must have said it.

Bad business dealings? The man is worth billions, so I'm certain he made a few good business decisions mixed in with those bankruptcies.

Divorces...who cares about that.

Trump made his billions in the private sector. Hillary has the Clinton Foundation slush fund, earning her millions while Secretary of State. Hmmm.

Hillary was fired from her lawyer firm for "unethical practices". When a lawyer gets fired by another lawyer for unethical practices, that is shocking.

And let's not forget Benghazi, the email server, the fake sniper fire,...oh gosh, this list can get long in a hurry.

As far as her qualifications vs Trump's qualifications, I'll put it like this. You are tasked with hiring a new plant manager, and the only two applicants are one with 5 previous plant manager jobs and one with no plant managerial experience. After a little research you discover that the one with 5 previous plant manager jobs were all at plants that blew up on her watch. I think I would go with the one with no experience.

Do you have an opinion based on facts or will you continue to use fox news talking points? Let me clean up your analogy. After researching more than one source you find that one candidate has four divorces which speaks to his lack of commitment, integrity, character. He also has several bankruptcies which reveals he's bad at decision making and needs to be bailed out. The research revealed that the candidate is a crook and has a pending fraud case coming up. That candidate is brash and has no tact so you wouldn't be able to put him in the room with other plant managers. And if we have a hispanic person on the interview board, he more than like completely disrespected them. So without the fox news BS, its clear out of these two candidates who deserves the job. Smh @ the ridiculousness of people's ability to rationalize voting for that fool Dumber Frump!

Posted
2 hours ago, nappyroots said:

If we start judging candidates by wealth, one of the koch brothers should run

This is the hidden content, please

Not judging candidates by wealth, merely responding to the misguided poster that called him a fool.  He's definitely not a fool.  Nor is Hillary.  They're a lot of things, but not fools.

Posted
2 hours ago, REBgp said:

Guess you didn't read the post where I had goggled, How many times has Trump been audited, & found he was currently audited & had been audited every year for the last 10 years.   When I goggled the same question for the Clintons, all I got was a list of Clinton's foes who had been audited, probably for political reasons.  Also, that "fool" is a multi-millionaire.  Made in business, unlike Hillary who gets her money from middle eastern countries, ergo, she's sold us out.  Plus the fact that that the Democratic Party is doing its best to turn our country to socialism/communism, yes, I'll vote for Trump.  I know there are faults in the Republican Party, you evidently ignore the faults of the Democrats, or you yourself are a Socialist.

That fool came from money and was given a head start that very few are afforded. That fool is a crook and shady businessman.  That fool defrauded people out of their money. That fool filed for bankruptcy not one but four times. That fool doesn't have the tact to be president. If that fool was running as a democrat you'd be destroying his dumb arse. I don't ignore anything. I vote for the candidate that will best speak to my situation. In this case I'm voting for the lesser of two evils and that's certainly NOT Dumber Frump!

Posted
23 minutes ago, Yeoj said:

That fool came from money and was given a head start that very few are afforded. That fool is a crook and shady businessman.  That fool defrauded people out of their money. That fool filed for bankruptcy not one but four times. That fool doesn't have the tact to be president. If that fool was running as a democrat you'd be destroying his dumb arse. I don't ignore anything. I vote for the candidate that will best speak to my situation. In this case I'm voting for the lesser of two evils and that's certainly NOT Dumber Frump!

H-ll, I don't like Trump.  Guess you haven't been reading my post.  Evidently, based on your post, you're not crazy about Hillary either.  

Funny thing is, how many of us, Dems & Repubs, don't "like" either one.  How did this happen?    I sure don't know.

Posted
1 hour ago, Yeoj said:

Do you have an opinion based on facts or will you continue to use fox news talking points? Let me clean up your analogy. After researching more than one source you find that one candidate has four divorces which speaks to his lack of commitment, integrity, character. He also has several bankruptcies which reveals he's bad at decision making and needs to be bailed out. The research revealed that the candidate is a crook and has a pending fraud case coming up. That candidate is brash and has no tact so you wouldn't be able to put him in the room with other plant managers. And if we have a hispanic person on the interview board, he more than like completely disrespected them. So without the fox news BS, its clear out of these two candidates who deserves the job. Smh @ the ridiculousness of people's ability to rationalize voting for that fool Dumber Frump!

I'm voting for Trump because he is the lesser of two evils. I will probably puke when I do vote for him, but I couldn't live with myself if I voted for Hillary.

Your personal attacks are kind of funny. You've said twice that I use Fox News talking points. Can you point to one I've used, or is this your attempt at profiling?

My rational for not voting for Hillary is sound. This country is almost $20 trillion dollars in debt, and yet she wants to continue spending. This country cannot survive much more of these liberal spending policies. And you want to talk about divorces.

And you didn't "clean up" my analogy. My analogy was dealing with the fact that many Liberals try to rationalize voting for Hillary based on the idea that she has experience and Trump has no experience. I refuted that contention with the analogy. You did nothing to refute that. You just went into an anti-Trump rant. But then again, it's clear from your rant you are all about profiling. I hope this is not your best attempt for a debate. I'm pretty confident you don't want a debate, you just want to spew your hate for Trump. If that is your goal, I'm not the one you need to be debating. I'm no Trump fan. If you want to debate on whether Hillary is qualified base on her "experience", I'm all for that.

Posted

Experience screwing the American taxpayer is what Clinton has!  Funny how the left is using all this experience talk when the guy that won it 8 years ago had been nothing but a community organizer, strange how that changes! 

Posted
1 minute ago, 77 said:

Experience screwing the American taxpayer is what Clinton has!  Funny how the left is using all this experience talk when the guy that won it 8 years ago had been nothing but a community organizer, strange how that changes! 

Republicans flip-flop. Liberals evolve.

Posted
8 hours ago, 77 said:

Experience screwing the American taxpayer is what Clinton has!  Funny how the left is using all this experience talk when the guy that won it 8 years ago had been nothing but a community organizer, strange how that changes! 

You guys defend trump, but if he was running on the democratic ticket doing and saying the same crap, you guys would be against him everyday. probably wouldn't say much about the racist crap though. Racism appeals to the republican base.

Posted
11 minutes ago, nappyroots said:

You guys defend trump, but if he was running on the democratic ticket doing and saying the same crap, you guys would be against him everyday. probably wouldn't say much about the racist crap though. Racism appeals to the republican base.

Perceived racism by Republicans is what fuels the Left. The Democrat leaders just throw out unfounded racism accusations and the Liberal followers fall in line like good little sheeple.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Member Statistics

    46,282
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    Unknown472929300
    Newest Member
    Unknown472929300
    Joined
×
×
  • Create New...