Jump to content

Upgrade Season


Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, NDOMAKONG said:

we got some new Monsanto formulated fertilizer, makes the mud thicker when we water... I mean when it rains on Thursday night during football season

Or when our 80's sprinklers come on in the middle of the night/early am and no one can catch it!

lol

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 7/22/2016 at 3:19 PM, pdawg119 said:

BH is getting a new video scoreboard.

Stallworth Stadium in Baytown is getting returfed. 

This is the hidden content, please

Just drove by Stallworth today. It looks like they're expanding the parking lot. They might also be renovating the lots that are already there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, pdawg119 said:

Just drove by Stallworth today. It looks like they're expanding the parking lot. They might also be renovating the lots that are already there.

You hear that Mid-County (specifically Ned): expanding the parking, something that's way overdue at your 2 schools. 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 7/24/2016 at 8:02 PM, Mr. Buddy Garrity said:

You hear that Mid-County (specifically Ned): expanding the parking, something that's way overdue at your 2 schools. 

 

 

I have said for years, they should use some of that field next to the stadium, but oh well.  Turf and parking lots don't win games, so...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On July 19, 2016 at 6:29 PM, Mr. Buddy Garrity said:

Anyone got pics of their upgrades please post here. Just seen Crosby's new scoreboard, hopefully Cal posts it here. Anybody turf done yet? 

IDK the dimensions, maybe someone else from Crosby does. I would imagine the administration made sure it's on par with some of the large ones in the state though:

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

38 minutes ago, Cougar14.2 said:

IDK the dimensions, maybe someone else from Crosby does. I would imagine the administration made sure it's on par with some of the large ones in the state though:

 

 

 

 

Looks to be about the same distance between the hash marks from the photo. I think that is like 53 feet. My guess us somwhere in the 50 foot range.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, BMTSoulja1 said:

....and maybe new school buildings and classrooms vs the 1970's version that now exist.

What? Them oldheads went to school in them buildings, build new and improved ones be damned, they better like them leaks and rust. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, BMTSoulja1 said:

Ok...  Great environment for these 2000's kids....  An environment from the stone ages, but I guess...  Whatever floats those "old head's" boat.  

Water, 

and floats young men's boat too. 

and some of those "secret" students at still in the stand for the spring game.

lol

Link to comment
Share on other sites

47 minutes ago, BMTSoulja1 said:

Ok...  Great environment for these 2000's kids....  An environment from the stone ages, but I guess...  Whatever floats those "old head's" boat.  

I never said I was against new schools, I am not.  I went through those schools and also worked for the ISD for a few years.  I know what condition they are in.   But the fact of the matter is, it doesn't seem to affect the students grades judging by how the ISD performs in relation to the rest of the state.  Now as far as the kids (and teachers) health goes, that is a different matter.  I have been in all the crawl spaces and back areas of the schools that the public never sees.  There is no more asbestos in the schools, but the mold, mildew and water damage is definitely not helping people that have to breathe that crap all day.  The current bond that was passed a couple of years ago helped with some of that but its time for new schools.   But that wont happen until the "old heads" as you say either move off, die off or change their minds.  I will say that the bond issues for new schools that were part of the 2012 vote were much closer than previous years, indicating that maybe the tide is turning.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Believe me, that bond that passed here in Crosby hit me in the pocket book, but when you have growth and outdated facilities you either fall behind and never catch up or you build the facilities.  You just always hope the decision makers do the right thing.  For high schools right down the road from each other, why is there such a significant difference in the facilities?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Member Statistics

    46,206
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    Ceb2000
    Newest Member
    Ceb2000
    Joined



  • Posts

    • It’s behind a paywall but here’s Baytown Sun’s story on it.  It was reported on in other papers statewide so if you search by the date I think you’ll find other stories on it. UIL strengthens student transfer rules By Ron McDowell [email protected] Oct 18, 2024   In order to maintain a level playing field for all member schools, the University Interscholastic League strengthened rules regarding transfer student eligibility at its most recent meeting in Austin. Every year thousands of students transfer schools in the state of Texas. A student’s ability to participate in UIL sanctioned activities may be limited base on the reasons for the transfer. A change in family status, work transfers, enrollment in an academic magnet program, or a move across town, receive scrutiny, but only rarely does one of these reasons result in the loss of eligibility. The only reason to automatically cause the loss of participation eligibility is a transfer for athletic purposes. The current rule, which has been in place since 1981, does not require a Previous Athletic Participation Form (PAPFs) to be submitted if the student-athlete does not participate in a varsity level sport during the first year of enrollment. There has been growing concern among some member schools, that other members are breaking the current rule and creating “super teams” with new transfer enrollees, and that the UIL is not doing enough to police, what appear to be, the inordinate number of transfers among high school athletes. To mitigate these concerns, the UIL approved a proposal to expand the power of the State Executive Committee (SEC) and allow it to investigate schools based upon the number of PAPFs submitted. Schools that submit an inordinate number of PAPFs would face heightened scrutiny and possible public reprimand and future sanctions. The UIL has also changed the requirements for PAPF submission, mandating that the form be submitted before a grade 9-12 transfer student may participate at any level of school athletics. This is a marked departure from the current policy which encourages schools not to complete PAPFs for students who transfer in, if the school believes that the student will not play a varsity sport in the first year the student is enrolled at the new school. Some critics of the current system think that the change doesn’t go far enough. Speaking on background, one local school district source suggested that there should be an automatic year wait for transfer students due to the number of loopholes in the waiver process. “If a student transfers, it should be a year out of competition automatically,” the source said. In addition, the UIL also approved a proposal that gives the SEC the power to appoint an independent administrator to oversee the conduct of the local District Executive Committee (DEC) if it is determined that the DEC is not consistently enforcing the rules of the governing body. The change is significant since all appeals that a school brings, starts and usually ends with the DEC. That includes the determination of transfer student eligibility. It is believed that with the implementation of this change, schools in a UIL district will be less likely to face retribution from the DEC chair and other members. The policy changes will go into effect, Aug. 1, 2025 This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up  
    • I was hoping WOS was going to win. To get another chance to redeem ourself. Silsbee did not look good in that game and has not played consistent during the season. Hopefully against La Vega they will play 4quarters of football
    • This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up   GCCISD paid a firm called PASA to compile this report ahead of them closing/consolidating some schools and redrawing attendance zones.
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...