new tobie Posted June 23, 2016 Report Posted June 23, 2016 On 6/23/2016 at 1:02 AM, 77 said: They will probably wish they had them when Soros and Obamas thugs show up! Expand You mean obama the two term president of the united states Quote
Englebert Posted June 23, 2016 Report Posted June 23, 2016 On 6/23/2016 at 2:34 AM, new tobie said: You mean obama the two term president of the united states Expand I don't want to speak for 77 but I think it is common knowledge when someone puts on here the word "Obama" they are talking about President Obama. Do you think he was referring to a different Obama? Quote
stevenash Posted June 23, 2016 Author Report Posted June 23, 2016 On 6/23/2016 at 2:34 AM, new tobie said: You mean obama the two term president of the united states Expand Newtobie- please explain this to me: " We need stricter background checks for American Gun Owners but we don't need stricter background checks for Syrian refugees baddog 1 Quote
nappyroots Posted June 23, 2016 Report Posted June 23, 2016 On 6/23/2016 at 2:48 AM, Englebert said: I don't want to speak for 77 but I think it is common knowledge when someone puts on here the word "Obama" they are talking about President Obama. Do you think he was referring to a different Obama? Expand I think tobie was trying to say that Obama has been a United States senator and President of the United States for 8 years, and that he will be paid for the rest of his life. Republican obstruction will not change that. He will be President Obama for the rest of his life. new tobie 1 Quote
new tobie Posted June 23, 2016 Report Posted June 23, 2016 On 6/23/2016 at 4:09 PM, nappyroots said: I think tobie was trying to say that Obama has been a United States senator and President of the United States for 8 years, and that he will be paid for the rest of his life. Republican obstruction will not change that. He will be President Obama for the rest of his life. Expand President Obama Quote
BLUEDOVE3 Posted June 23, 2016 Report Posted June 23, 2016 I need to find the non- partisan academic article I read a couple of weeks ago explaining why you people are so scared and why the rest of us feel so liberal. But here is my take: The 1950's yall were running around about a communist scare, the 1960's you were afraid of Civil Rights, the 1970's yall were full of Pot, 1980's -2000's yall just stone crazy now Quote
stevenash Posted June 23, 2016 Author Report Posted June 23, 2016 On 6/23/2016 at 4:39 PM, BLUEDOVE3 said: I need to find the non- partisan academic article I read a couple of weeks ago explaining why you people are so scared and why the rest of us feel so liberal. But here is my take: The 1950's yall were running around about a communist scare, the 1960's you were afraid of Civil Rights, the 1970's yall were full of Pot, 1980's -2000's yall just stone crazy now Expand Yes, please find the "non partisan" article. Very interested to see it. Is Michael Moore the author? Quote
BLUEDOVE3 Posted June 23, 2016 Report Posted June 23, 2016 On 6/19/2016 at 4:11 PM, Englebert said: One more question, if someone is on the Terrorist Watch List, shouldn't FBI agents be able to have surprise raids/inspections without a warrant on any of their houses? After all, if we can arbitrarily stripped their second amendment rights, shouldn't we be able to stripped any and all of their rights? Expand NO!!! It's a watch list, not a conviction list. And you probably "think" you abide civil rights Quote
Englebert Posted June 23, 2016 Report Posted June 23, 2016 On 6/23/2016 at 4:43 PM, BLUEDOVE3 said: NO!!! It's a watch list, not a conviction list. And you probably "think" you abide civil rights Expand So why do Democrats think they can strip someone's second amendment right without a conviction, but not the fourth? Please explain how the fourth amendment is unimpeachable, but the second amendment can be tossed aside based on assumptions and accusations. And that's the best shot you can come up with..."I think I abide by civil rights". That is weak. LOL Quote
Englebert Posted June 23, 2016 Report Posted June 23, 2016 On 6/23/2016 at 4:09 PM, nappyroots said: I think tobie was trying to say that Obama has been a United States senator and President of the United States for 8 years, and that he will be paid for the rest of his life. Republican obstruction will not change that. He will be President Obama for the rest of his life. Expand You read a lot into something not said. I don't know how you can come to that conclusion based on the limited information provided. You could possibly be right, but if so that statement needs more context for rational people to deduce the meaning. Quote
Englebert Posted June 23, 2016 Report Posted June 23, 2016 On 6/23/2016 at 4:39 PM, BLUEDOVE3 said: I need to find the non- partisan academic article I read a couple of weeks ago explaining why you people are so scared and why the rest of us feel so liberal. But here is my take: The 1950's yall were running around about a communist scare, the 1960's you were afraid of Civil Rights, the 1970's yall were full of Pot, 1980's -2000's yall just stone crazy now Expand White people were at the forefront of Civil Rights. Do you actually think that 13% of the population could get legislation passed that 87% of the population was scared of. Sounds like one of those revisionist history stories you are so found of. Quote
Englebert Posted June 23, 2016 Report Posted June 23, 2016 On 6/23/2016 at 4:09 PM, nappyroots said: I think tobie was trying to say that Obama has been a United States senator and President of the United States for 8 years, and that he will be paid for the rest of his life. Republican obstruction will not change that. He will be President Obama for the rest of his life. On 6/23/2016 at 4:10 PM, new tobie said: President Obama Expand Expand Are you implying that nappyroots is "dissing" Obama by not adding President in front of his name? Quote
new tobie Posted June 23, 2016 Report Posted June 23, 2016 On 6/23/2016 at 4:59 PM, Englebert said: Are you implying that nappyroots is "dissing" Obama by not adding President in front of his name? Expand Exactly, nappy is not exempt Quote
Englebert Posted June 23, 2016 Report Posted June 23, 2016 On 6/23/2016 at 5:26 PM, new tobie said: Exactly, nappy is not exempt Expand Nice. I'm not going to speak for nappy, but I will continue to refer to President Obama as simply Obama, just as I do for GW, Clinton, Bush I, Carter, Ford, and every other president. I refer to Hillary Clinton as Hillary to differentiate her from Bill. There are many, many things for which to criticize Hillary and Obama. I'm not going to stoop to a cheap shot on a name when there is so much more available material. PhatMack19 1 Quote
77 Posted June 23, 2016 Report Posted June 23, 2016 Here is the problem with the whole gun talk. Rangle says law abiding people dont need guns but when the reporter ask about guns all around him and DC protecting politicians he says well thats different. Our school children should at least be protected as good as the criminals in DC! This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up Hagar 1 Quote
77 Posted June 23, 2016 Report Posted June 23, 2016 On 6/23/2016 at 2:48 AM, Englebert said: I don't want to speak for 77 but I think it is common knowledge when someone puts on here the word "Obama" they are talking about President Obama. Do you think he was referring to a different Obama? Expand Yes that Obama the same one that siced the IRS on the people of America that dont agree with his views. You do know that if we dont call these crooks on things like this the shoe may be on the other foot next time! Quote
77 Posted June 24, 2016 Report Posted June 24, 2016 This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up Hagar 1 Quote
baddog Posted June 24, 2016 Report Posted June 24, 2016 On 6/24/2016 at 12:53 PM, 77 said: This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up Expand Sure am glad all us conservatives are simply paranoid. Whoever hired those jokers should be taken out and shot. Quote
baddog Posted June 25, 2016 Report Posted June 25, 2016 Never been to Idaho (came close when at Glacier National Park) but I always liked them. I love when the children, I mean democrats, are having sit-ins over gun control, states like Idaho are carrying out their own agendas to the contrary. This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up 77 1 Quote
stevenash Posted June 26, 2016 Author Report Posted June 26, 2016 This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up Hagar 1 Quote
nappyroots Posted June 26, 2016 Report Posted June 26, 2016 This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up This is 2010. don't know how much a diffrence the last 6 years has made. Quote
nappyroots Posted June 26, 2016 Report Posted June 26, 2016 This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up Looks like cigarettes are a bigger problem than guns Quote
baddog Posted June 26, 2016 Report Posted June 26, 2016 On 6/26/2016 at 2:57 PM, stevenash said: This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up Expand This is what Big Girl would look like going up against someone armed with facts. Sad for sure when a newswoman with an anti-gun agenda only looks at the statistics that are true, but are skewed when compared to other statistics. Quote
BS Wildcats Posted June 26, 2016 Report Posted June 26, 2016 Just saw where 6 ppl stabbed at California Capital building. Guess Yobammy and the libtards will go after knives next. Quote
Hagar Posted June 26, 2016 Report Posted June 26, 2016 On 6/26/2016 at 2:57 PM, stevenash said: This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up Expand Talk about a person who planned to ambush someone and getting verbally B-slapped? Bet she Never, Ever, has that guy on again. Good chance she'll never bring up gun ownership at all. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.