77 Posted June 30, 2016 Report Posted June 30, 2016 Heres one the media is not talking about wonder why? This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up Quote
Bobcat1 Posted June 30, 2016 Report Posted June 30, 2016 I see what you're saying, but no one died in this instance. Quote
77 Posted June 30, 2016 Author Report Posted June 30, 2016 Its because it dont fit their agenda a legal gun owner saved lives! Quote
LumRaiderFan Posted June 30, 2016 Report Posted June 30, 2016 1 hour ago, Bobcat1 said: I see what you're saying, but no one died in this instance. Exactly why you didn't hear much about it...the shooter was stopped by a conceal carry holder that didn't wind up killing everyone in sight. Also, looks like the bad guy should not have even been able to have a gun, if that's the case, more gun control laws wouldn't help. As 77 stated, none of this fits the left's/media's agenda, in fact, it hurts it, so it becomes a non-story. 77 1 Quote
Mr. Buddy Garrity Posted June 30, 2016 Report Posted June 30, 2016 1 hour ago, Bobcat1 said: I see what you're saying, but no one died in this instance. Outside the club. Not inside with a big crowd, darkness and loud music. Just a tad bit different in comparison. Regardless, some innocent people got shot. Quote
tvc184 Posted June 30, 2016 Report Posted June 30, 2016 It isn't a national news story. Even if it was noteworthy (which it isn't)..... 1. No one died. 2. A good guy shot and stopped the bad guy. 3. There is no political agenda. NOW with that in mind.... If someone ever says Trayvon Martin or Michael Brown, we should all be saying, "who are they?". Those should never have been national news stories either. For any explanation, see #3 above. Hagar and 77 2 Quote
new tobie Posted July 1, 2016 Report Posted July 1, 2016 13 hours ago, tvc184 said: It isn't a national news story. Even if it was noteworthy (which it isn't)..... 1. No one died. 2. A good guy shot and stopped the bad guy. 3. There is no political agenda. NOW with that in mind.... If someone ever says Trayvon Martin or Michael Brown, we should all be saying, "who are they?". Those should never have been national news stories either. For any explanation, see #3 above. An unarmed teenager being murdered is a national news story. These days McDonalds coming out with a new burger is national news Quote
tvc184 Posted July 1, 2016 Report Posted July 1, 2016 1 hour ago, new tobie said: An unarmed teenager being murdered is a national news story. These days McDonalds coming out with a new burger is national news It is a national story only because it fit an agenda. The unarmed teenager attacked a man, slammed his head in the ground and was killed in self defense. That is not national news and if it was then we need a self-defense news channel to cover all such local incidents. Just like the Michael Brown self defense case, the local DA did an investigation and found no evidence to prove a criminal offense. In Florida they have a law that allows a prosecutor to coming in and indict without a grand jury. The probable cause affidavit in that case was laughable. Then with all the evidence they could muster, they could not find a guilty verdict from a jury, which one of the jurors publicly stated, wanted to convict but could find no evidence to support it. In Missouri the US Justice Department came in and spent who knows how many thousands or possibly millions of dollars to try to indict a local officer but they were stuck with the fact that they had to go to a grand jury (unlike FL) and again, could find no evidence to even indict, much less convict. Oh wait, the DA in both cases had it correct before a local issue became a national incident to try and push that agenda. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.