baddog Posted June 30, 2016 Report Posted June 30, 2016 This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up Quote
LumRaiderFan Posted June 30, 2016 Report Posted June 30, 2016 Yes...but she won't. How else can she provide cover. I'm sure Bill laid it out very clearly what to do and what could happen if she doesn't. Quote
baddog Posted June 30, 2016 Author Report Posted June 30, 2016 5 minutes ago, LumRaiderFan said: Yes...but she won't. How else can she provide cover. I'm sure Bill laid it out very clearly what to do and what could happen if she doesn't. Does she lift weights? Quote
LumRaiderFan Posted June 30, 2016 Report Posted June 30, 2016 1 minute ago, baddog said: Does she lift weights? lol...I wasn't insinuating anything that extreme (although not out of the question). He probably simply reminded her that the Clintons made her and they can break her. Quote
stevenash Posted June 30, 2016 Report Posted June 30, 2016 TXHoops- what is your opinion regarding this situation? Quote
77 Posted July 1, 2016 Report Posted July 1, 2016 Old Bill may have slipped her a little willie! Quote
Hagar Posted July 1, 2016 Report Posted July 1, 2016 Just happened to meet! Just talked primarily about grandchildren! Male bovine feces. As George Strait sang, I got some ocean front property in Arizona. He probably handed her the list of the 50 or so "convenient" deaths of people associated with the Clintons, and ask her if she wanted her name added to it. Englebert and BS Wildcats 2 Quote
Hagar Posted July 1, 2016 Report Posted July 1, 2016 This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up Another link worth a look. Little better graphics lol Quote
shovel Posted July 1, 2016 Report Posted July 1, 2016 The corruption here is flagrant. Of course, the Clinton Foundation has been flagrant all along. Nothing will happen as long as the Democrats are in control. As the lying, commie, crooked female dog says "What difference, at this point, does it make?" Nothing to see here, move along... JWB and 77 2 Quote
TxHoops Posted July 2, 2016 Report Posted July 2, 2016 On June 30, 2016 at 4:16 PM, stevenash said: TXHoops- what is your opinion regarding this situation? If anything was discussed regarding the investigation, she has a legal and ethical obligation to appoint a special prosecutor. If it was small talk and pleasantries, no such obligation exists. Obviously when an AG has to investigate the President who appointed them, a special prosecutor should be appointed due to the inherent conflict. However, many will do so in situations like this to avoid the "appearance of impropriety." Ultimately though, all they need to do is get someone appointed who is "friendly" to their particular party and the appointed one does not hold office and is actually has less at stake professionally. The effect is often just passing the buck to accomplish a certain end without the public scrutiny to the officeholder. So to answer the question, first it really depends on what was said (legally and ethically). Second, if nothing was discussed about the investigation, whether Lynch believes she can do the job she was appointed to do without bias (which is a moral issue to me). And I think we can safely assume her position there. UTfanatic and Hagar 2 Quote
TxHoops Posted July 2, 2016 Report Posted July 2, 2016 Oh, and I realize that was a technical and somewhat cynical answer, Nash. If you're asking me what I would do, I don't know the intricacies of her relationship with the Clintons. I think once you get past the initial legal issue, it becomes a personal moral one. To put it in perspective, I would not feel comfortable leading an investigation involving you, REBgp, or a number of people on this site who I know and with whom I am friendly. It would not be a legal obstacle but certainly a moral one to me. Therefore I would absolutely recuse myself from the situation and appoint someone independent to do the job. And hopefully one with more of a moral compass than Ken Starr UTfanatic and Mr. Buddy Garrity 2 Quote
77 Posted July 2, 2016 Report Posted July 2, 2016 It dont matter because the FBI is gonna side with Clinton obama is not gonna let her go down because she knows to much on him! Quote
Hagar Posted July 2, 2016 Report Posted July 2, 2016 3 minutes ago, TxHoops said: Oh, and I realize that was a technical and somewhat cynical answer, Nash. If you're asking me what I would do, I don't know the intricacies of her relationship with the Clintons. I think once you get past the initial legal issue, it becomes a personal moral one. To put it in perspective, I would not feel comfortable leading an investigation involving you, REBgp, or a number of people on this site who I know and with whom I am friendly. It would not be a legal obstacle but certainly a moral one to me. Therefore I would absolutely recuse myself from the situation and appoint someone independent to do the job. And hopefully one with more of a moral compass than Ken Starr Heck no, if it's me, no recuse! And every time I'm called before you, I'll be wearing burnt orange UTfanatic and TxHoops 2 Quote
stevenash Posted July 2, 2016 Report Posted July 2, 2016 49 minutes ago, TxHoops said: If anything was discussed regarding the investigation, she has a legal and ethical obligation to appoint a special prosecutor. If it was small talk and pleasantries, no such obligation exists. Obviously when an AG has to investigate the President who appointed them, a special prosecutor should be appointed due to the inherent conflict. However, many will do so in situations like this to avoid the "appearance of impropriety." Ultimately though, all they need to do is get someone appointed who is "friendly" to their particular party and the appointed one does not hold office and is actually has less at stake professionally. The effect is often just passing the buck to accomplish a certain end without the public scrutiny to the officeholder. So to answer the question, first it really depends on what was said (legally and ethically). Second, if nothing was discussed about the investigation, whether Lynch believes she can do the job she was appointed to do without bias (which is a moral issue to me). And I think we can safely assume her position there. I am really struggling with the "suggestion" that one of them landed and waited 30 minutes on the tarmac for the other to land to simply exchange "pleasantries" baddog 1 Quote
Hagar Posted July 3, 2016 Report Posted July 3, 2016 7 hours ago, stevenash said: I am really struggling with the "suggestion" that one of them landed and waited 30 minutes on the tarmac for the other to land to simply exchange "pleasantries" Yep, just happened to meet. As the church lady on snl use to say, "How convenient". I'd be curious to know when the last time was that Bill & Loretta just sit down and had a personal conversation. Just the two of them. Quote
stevenash Posted July 3, 2016 Report Posted July 3, 2016 It was pure coincidence that Mr. Clinton and Mrs. Lynch landed at the airport almost at the same time. It also was pure coincidence that the FBI had their extended interview with Mrs. Clinton shortly after that meeting. TxHoops, do these two have, as you say, a good "moral compass"? Quote
LumRaiderFan Posted July 3, 2016 Report Posted July 3, 2016 1 hour ago, stevenash said: It was pure coincidence that Mr. Clinton and Mrs. Lynch landed at the airport almost at the same time. It also was pure coincidence that the FBI had their extended interview with Mrs. Clinton shortly after that meeting. TxHoops, do these two have, as you say, a good "moral compass"? And these two go way back...I'm sure Bill feels she "owes" him. This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up From the article: In 1999, she was nominated by President This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up to serve as the This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up . Quote
77 Posted July 5, 2016 Report Posted July 5, 2016 Guarantee FBI will find no wrong doing (corruption continues) although we all know she is crooked as a snake! Quote
PhatMack19 Posted July 5, 2016 Report Posted July 5, 2016 FBI is on now. Hillary is going to walk Quote
PhatMack19 Posted July 5, 2016 Report Posted July 5, 2016 Hillary didn't mean to do it. End of story. Move along Mr. Buddy Garrity 1 Quote
77 Posted July 5, 2016 Report Posted July 5, 2016 Told ya, crooks take care of their own kind! baddog 1 Quote
baddog Posted July 5, 2016 Author Report Posted July 5, 2016 How does one accidentally do something repeatedly? Quote
77 Posted July 5, 2016 Report Posted July 5, 2016 He did say they found 110 classified documents so there is no doubt she lied to us all about that! Quote
JWB Posted July 5, 2016 Report Posted July 5, 2016 Dang Shame!!! the FBI Director is bought and paid for! Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.