Does Rush still make fun of teleprompters?

[westend1]

Seems like since Republicans started using them, I haven't heard much about them.

[tvc184]

I don't think Rush or anyone else has an issue with teleprompters. They are just a modern convenience instead of notes. Abraham Lincoln didn't give the Gettysburg Address from memory. 

The problem is with people that cannot give any answer without it being fed to him/her. 

Trump can talk for a long time without video prompting. You can really tell when Obama goes of the script and he stumbles, stammers and generally flubs his answers. He is a great speech giver when he can read it. He can hardly put a sentence together when he isn't. 

I am not a Trump fan but speaking isn't his problem. 

[new tobie]

Donald trumps speaking is crazy

[LumRaiderFan]

12 minutes ago, new tobie said:

Donald trumps speaking is crazy

It's not his fault...they keep putting dumb stuff on the teleprompter...Democrat sabotage, maybe? 

[Englebert]

19 minutes ago, new tobie said:

Donald trumps speaking is crazy

Yep, that's the narrative out of the Democrat leadership. Too bad they can't back it up. But what's really sad, is that their constituents believe them.

[stevenash]

27 minutes ago, new tobie said:

Donald trumps speaking is crazy

Does that reflect your objectivity?

[tvc184]

2 hours ago, new tobie said:

Donald trumps speaking is crazy

He can throw some fireballs but getting off the prompter isn't his problem. 

[new tobie]

Donald does better on the teleprompter.

Without it he is more like Donald duck

[Englebert]

51 minutes ago, new tobie said:

Donald Obama does better on the teleprompter.

Without it he is more like Donald duck

FIFY

[new tobie]

Ive never seen a candidate not supported by so many leaders of his own party, and its not because of him not being a politician, because if Michael Bloomberg were running are Charles koch it would be different and either one of those guys could buy Trump

[stevenash]

That's because you have never seen a candidate before get this far while refusing to submit to the establishment.  Establishment doesn't want to let go of its little play pen and will try every trick in the book to maintain it.

[nappyroots]

On 7/30/2016 at 11:58 AM, stevenash said:

That's because you have never seen a candidate before get this far while refusing to submit to the establishment.  Establishment doesn't want to let go of its little play pen and will try every trick in the book to maintain it.

.......please!

 

 

 

[stevenash]

11 minutes ago, nappyroots said:

.......please!

 

 

 

I guess you are stating that the public is not fed up, and is very satisfied with the way government operates?

[new tobie]

2 hours ago, stevenash said:

I guess you are stating that the public is not fed up, and is very satisfied with the way government operates?

I will have that answer on November 8th 2016

[LumRaiderFan]

2 hours ago, stevenash said:

I guess you are stating that the public is not fed up, and is very satisfied with the way government operates?

Some are very satisfied.

[stevenash]

1 hour ago, new tobie said:

I will have that answer on November 8th 2016

You could have said that about every single election.  In 2008, did you get "change you could believe in"?

[nappyroots]

3 hours ago, stevenash said:

You could have said that about every single election.  In 2008, did you get "change you could believe in"?

I didn't have it in 2007 either

[stevenash]

4 minutes ago, nappyroots said:

I didn't have it in 2007 either

Nobody was promising it to you in 2007 and getting in office resultantly

[new tobie]

On 8/2/2016 at 4:46 PM, stevenash said:

Nobody was promising it to you in 2007 and getting in office resultantly

2008-2016 was a direct result of 2000-2008

[LumRaiderFan]

10 minutes ago, new tobie said:

2008-2016 was a direct result of 2000-2008

Nope...it was a direct result of what Frank-Dodd did.

We were punished for what democrats did by voting in more democrats.

Voters were swayed by a simple "Yes, we can" and "Change you can believe in".

Google it...oh, that's right, you don't google democrats.