Jump to content

France Is Learning - When Will We

Hagar

By Hagar
in Political Forum

 Share

Recommended Posts

Hagar

Hagar

Posted
  • Author
Posted
18 minutes ago, BS Wildcats said:

But we might offend someone, and our potus will have to apologize for the US trying to protect its own soil.  It is time to end the political correctness crap.

Yep, Clint Eastwood is right about this generation.

(see link under Trump Unbelievable)

Link to comment
Share on other sites
BS Wildcats

BS Wildcats

Posted
Posted
15 minutes ago, westend1 said:

 

serious question.  Should we amend the constitution so we can ban Muslims from congregating and shut down Mosques?  Constitutionally, can we do it now?

Don't know that we need to amend the Constitution, Obama has used executive decision multiple times.  Are you against shutting them down if they are promoting harm and murder upon Americans?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
stevenash

stevenash

Posted
Posted
38 minutes ago, BS Wildcats said:

Don't know that we need to amend the Constitution, Obama has used executive decision multiple times.  Are you against shutting them down if they are promoting harm and murder upon Americans?

We must be careful not to "offend" anyone.  Apparently that is more important than preserving life here.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
77

77

Posted
Posted

Only need to shut them down if they are preaching hate against US and stoking the radicals to act but to answer your question , not as long as we have a democrat in office they want voters more than they want to keep anyone safe over here. JMO

Link to comment
Share on other sites
westend1

westend1

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, BS Wildcats said:

Don't know that we need to amend the Constitution, Obama has used executive decision multiple times.  Are you against shutting them down if they are promoting harm and murder upon Americans?

So, you have no problem using executive action, even if it violates the constitution?   If they preach hate, I am personally ok with it.  But, I thought true conservatives were against this sort of thing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
BS Wildcats

BS Wildcats

Posted
Posted
15 minutes ago, westend1 said:

So, you have no problem using executive action, even if it violates the constitution?   If they preach hate, I am personally ok with it.  But, I thought true conservatives were against this sort of thing.

Absolutely am against it.  Was being sarcastic about executive action.  As for shutting down Mosques that are teaching violence and terrorism, get after it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
CraigS

CraigS

Posted
Posted
11 hours ago, westend1 said:

 

serious question.  Should we amend the constitution so we can ban Muslims from congregating and shut down Mosques?  Constitutionally, can we do it now?

Just curious. Where in the Constitution does it say anything about shutting down mosque? or a church, for that matter? Certainly we all know you can't do either just because they are this religion or that......I think westboro should be shut down as well, along with the KKK, black panthers, hells angels, banditos, any many others...if they represent gangs, terror, hate...no amendment is needed for that. These groups are not practicing free speech...they are practicing hate through their speech.

 

On another note....pertaining to muslims. It is already a law, and Constitutional for the POTUS to be able to ban ANYONE for ANY REASON if he feels they are a threat to Americans. He can do this even against the "protected" religion, sex, disabled, ect. ..and he can do it to entire groups...even if it's only a few....even though both parties have trashed Trump for saying he would ban ALL muslins in the beginning. ...his handlers screwed this up, by not immediately responding with said law and making both parties look stupid.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
CraigS

CraigS

Posted
Posted
19 minutes ago, new tobie said:

Obama has used executive order less the last two presidents

It's not always about how many or few times used....but the context in which it is used. obama is certainly within his power to use executive orders...but I would venture to guess he has used it more controversially than any other, perhaps even unconstitutionally, so says the high court.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
new tobie

new tobie

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, CraigS said:

It's not always about how many or few times used....but the context in which it is used. obama is certainly within his power to use executive orders...but I would venture to guess he has used it more controversially than any other, perhaps even unconstitutionally, so says the high court.

If obama found a cure for cancer you guys would find a problem with it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
LumRaiderFan

LumRaiderFan

Posted
Posted
36 minutes ago, CraigS said:

Just curious. Where in the Constitution does it say anything about shutting down mosque? or a church, for that matter? Certainly we all know you can't do either just because they are this religion or that......I think westboro should be shut down as well, along with the KKK, black panthers, hells angels, banditos, any many others...if they represent gangs, terror, hate...no amendment is needed for that. These groups are not practicing free speech...they are practicing hate through their speech.

 

On another note....pertaining to muslims. It is already a law, and Constitutional for the POTUS to be able to ban ANYONE for ANY REASON if he feels they are a threat to Americans. He can do this even against the "protected" religion, sex, disabled, ect. ..and he can do it to entire groups...even if it's only a few....even though both parties have trashed Trump for saying he would ban ALL muslins in the beginning. ...his handlers screwed this up, by not immediately responding with said law and making both parties look stupid.

Standard operating procedure from the left...we will not do anything to stop terrorism...we won't stem the tide of illegals from all countries that aren't vetted coming into the country, in fact we want to increase that number...even when you have other countries that have regretted going down the same road and are now paying the price and trying to figure out how to handle it.

We won't profile because as stevenash pointed out earlier, it is more important to not offend anyone than it is to protect the American people.

The left won't do basically anything about this problem but complains when someone else proposes to.

Reagan had to come in and clean up Carters's weakness...Bush had to come in and clean up Clinton's weakness, and now someone has to clean up Obama's weakness...Trump may not get it done but Clinton won't for sure.

Weakness always allows problems to start and/or get worse but hates it when strength is used to fix them...always.

Recent history has shown that if you want to fix Democrat's national security problems...elect a Republican...this cannot be refuted.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
CraigS

CraigS

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, new tobie said:

If obama found a cure for cancer you guys would find a problem with it.

it's not his cure's that we have a problem with....it's his causes. He hasn't cured cancer (racial tensions) he has created a new level of cancer (racial tensions). The absolute worse we've seen in decades. whereas you see we "have a problem with it" we see you "give him a pass" for  the same reasons you accuse us.....is either better than the other?

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
new tobie

new tobie

Posted
Posted
3 minutes ago, CraigS said:

it's not his cure's that we have a problem with....it's his causes. He hasn't cured cancer (racial tensions) he has created a new level of cancer (racial tensions). The absolute worse we've seen in decades. whereas you see we "have a problem with it" we see you "give him a pass" for  the same reasons you accuse us.....is either better than the other?

 

Racial tensions have been here over 100 years. Racial problems have never gotten better with people 40 and above. The young folk are mixing races at record rates though. The younger generation dont care about hate quite as much as their parents and grandparents. Obama is not to blame.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
baddog

baddog

Posted
Posted
5 minutes ago, new tobie said:

Racial tensions have been here over 100 years. Racial problems have never gotten better with people 40 and above. The young folk are mixing races at record rates though. The younger generation dont care about hate quite as much as their parents and grandparents. Obama is not to blame.

What does this have to do with France and Muslims?

Obama will never even search for a cancer cure. It would be good for America.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
CraigS

CraigS

Posted
Posted
20 minutes ago, new tobie said:

Racial tensions have been here over 100 years. Racial problems have never gotten better with people 40 and above. The young folk are mixing races at record rates though. The younger generation dont care about hate quite as much as their parents and grandparents. Obama is not to blame.

And that attitude is why he gets away with it. You are quick to blame history...and can't (won't) see the present. As the saying goes........you can't see the forest for the trees.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Member Statistics

    46,206
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    Ceb2000
    Newest Member
    Ceb2000
    Joined


×
×
  • Create New...