-
Member Statistics
46,206
Total Members1,837
Most Online
-
Posts
-
REL was 6-4 this season, doing all right in 5A-2. No lie, though, transfers out hurt GCCISD athletics BAD and it’s all sports, not just football. I posted the transfer numbers already and those are straight from GCCISD. I’m no District employee and don’t speak for them, GCCISD made all the info I’ve posted public knowledge ahead of the school consolidations and attendance zone changes they’re going to have to get done this coming Summer, but it’s obvious looking at those numbers what’s going on and again, it’s not like Barber’s Hill is the only one who does this. ALL the successful programs draw in kids from surrounding districts and the real Big Dawgs have drawn in a few from a lot further than that over the years. It’s just going to get a bit harder to do that after next season, that’s all. -
By RETIREDFAN1 · Posted
1. Coppell 2. North Shore 3. Atascocita 4. DeSoto 5. Summer Creek 6. Kingwood 7. Cibolo Steele 8. College Station 9. La Porte 10. Anna 11. Texas High 12. SA Alamo Heights 13. Sulphur Springs 14. Aubrey 15. Carthage 16. Waco La Vega 17. Winnsboro 18. Malakoff 19. Canadian 20. Woodville 21. Newton 22. Waskom 23. Shelbyville 24. Refugio 25. Jayton -
By AggiesAreWe · Posted
Same here. Silsbee is undefeated vs. WO-S in the playoffs. -
-
So you say Nah , not throwing accusations and turn around and make the accusation again. So this is the ANGLE Goose Creek Athletics will take now. Accuse districts of recruiting their athletes and blame that of why they are not very good
-
-
Topics
-
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.