new tobie Posted August 22, 2016 Report Posted August 22, 2016 Don't believe obama has time to take your guns, might as well transition to if Hillary is elected she will come for your guns! Quote
77 Posted August 22, 2016 Report Posted August 22, 2016 Hope not we are gonna need them with all the felons Obama is releasing from prison! Hagar 1 Quote
new tobie Posted August 22, 2016 Author Report Posted August 22, 2016 9 minutes ago, 77 said: Hope not we are gonna need them with all the felons Obama is releasing from prison! we will see. Quote
BS Wildcats Posted August 22, 2016 Report Posted August 22, 2016 7 minutes ago, new tobie said: Â Â Quote
BS Wildcats Posted August 22, 2016 Report Posted August 22, 2016 16 minutes ago, 77 said: Hope not we are gonna need them with all the felons Obama is releasing from prison! Don't forget about the peace loving Muslims he wants to bring in. Â By the thousands! 77 1 Quote
new tobie Posted August 22, 2016 Author Report Posted August 22, 2016 Do muslims account for all deaths in the US Quote
baddog Posted August 22, 2016 Report Posted August 22, 2016 1 hour ago, new tobie said: Do muslims account for all deaths in the US Let someone you love be gunned down by these savages while screaming "death to Americans", you will change your tune. For the record, I hope you don't lose anyone that way. Sometimes it has to become personal before some see the light. UTfanatic 1 Quote
stevenash Posted August 22, 2016 Report Posted August 22, 2016 1 hour ago, new tobie said: Do muslims account for all deaths in the US Nope- just like police don't either BS Wildcats, Chester86 and 77 3 Quote
nappyroots Posted August 23, 2016 Report Posted August 23, 2016 19 hours ago, baddog said: Let someone you love be gunned down by these savages while screaming "death to Americans", you will change your tune. For the record, I hope you don't lose anyone that way. Sometimes it has to become personal before some see the light. I would feel thel same if blacks or whites did it. Quote
nappyroots Posted August 23, 2016 Report Posted August 23, 2016 19 hours ago, stevenash said: Nope- just like police don't either This can be said for many groups. Quote
Englebert Posted August 23, 2016 Report Posted August 23, 2016 new tobie, I want to ask you a question and see if you can answer honestly. If for some reason Congress lost their minds and passed a bill prohibiting gun ownership is the U.S., do you think Obama would sign that bill into law? Quote
PhatMack19 Posted August 24, 2016 Report Posted August 24, 2016 There is a pretty interesting protest taking place tomorrow at that liberal university in Austin.  The pictures are pretty great.  Tomorrow should be fun. Quote
TxHoops Posted August 24, 2016 Report Posted August 24, 2016 2 hours ago, PhatMack19 said: There is a pretty interesting protest taking place tomorrow at that liberal university in Austin. The pictures are pretty great.  Tomorrow should be fun. AKA your daddy Quote
Hagar Posted August 24, 2016 Report Posted August 24, 2016 2 hours ago, TxHoops said: AKA your daddy Can't wait for PhatMack's response to that b-slap lol. Quote
PhatMack19 Posted August 24, 2016 Report Posted August 24, 2016 8 hours ago, TxHoops said: AKA your daddy My daddy wouldn't ever be juggling dicks.... Quote
TxHoops Posted August 24, 2016 Report Posted August 24, 2016 2 minutes ago, PhatMack19 said: My daddy wouldn't ever be juggling dicks.... Strictly a ewe man? Â Never a ram? Quote
nappyroots Posted September 2, 2016 Report Posted September 2, 2016 On 8/23/2016 at 9:15 AM, Englebert said: new tobie, I want to ask you a question and see if you can answer honestly. If for some reason Congress lost their minds and passed a bill prohibiting gun ownership is the U.S., do you think Obama would sign that bill into law? I can't answer the question because this will NEVER happen. Even if the dems controlled congress this will never happen. Many dems want to own guns also. Gun ownership is not just a republican thing. Obama just wants to try and DO SOMETHING about high powered rifles getting into the wrong hands. Their are many problems in the world today, some can be solved, some can be made better. Nothing will ever happen unless we do something. I said it before, and i don't give a.... what was done in the past but it is a congressional failure when they refused to vote on Garland.....vote NO, but do your job and vote. Would say the same thing if the situation was reversed. Healthcare: if the pubs would have done something about the medical facilities, doctors and pharmeseudical companys out of control cost, the affordable care act would not be in existence. Insurance companies have been and are out of control. Many people paid state farm and farmers premiums for 20 to 30 years, but after the two big hurricanes and they had to pay out so they dropped some of these customers. Quote
nappyroots Posted September 2, 2016 Report Posted September 2, 2016 This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up Quote
nappyroots Posted September 2, 2016 Report Posted September 2, 2016 This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up Quote
nappyroots Posted September 2, 2016 Report Posted September 2, 2016 This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up HW didn't play Quote
BS Wildcats Posted September 2, 2016 Report Posted September 2, 2016 23 minutes ago, nappyroots said: I can't answer the question because this will NEVER happen. Even if the dems controlled congress this will never happen. Many dems want to own guns also. Gun ownership is not just a republican thing. Obama just wants to try and DO SOMETHING about high powered rifles getting into the wrong hands. Their are many problems in the world today, some can be solved, some can be made better. Nothing will ever happen unless we do something. I said it before, and i don't give a.... what was done in the past but it is a congressional failure when they refused to vote on Garland.....vote NO, but do your job and vote. Would say the same thing if the situation was reversed. Healthcare: if the pubs would have done something about the medical facilities, doctors and pharmeseudical companys out of control cost, the affordable care act would not be in existence. Insurance companies have been and are out of control. Many people paid state farm and farmers premiums for 20 to 30 years, but after the two big hurricanes and they had to pay out so they dropped some of these customers. So this is strictly the fault of pubs.  That is laughable. Quote
Englebert Posted September 2, 2016 Report Posted September 2, 2016 1 hour ago, nappyroots said: I can't answer the question because this will NEVER happen. Even if the dems controlled congress this will never happen. Many dems want to own guns also. Gun ownership is not just a republican thing. Obama just wants to try and DO SOMETHING about high powered rifles getting into the wrong hands. Their are many problems in the world today, some can be solved, some can be made better. Nothing will ever happen unless we do something. I said it before, and i don't give a.... what was done in the past but it is a congressional failure when they refused to vote on Garland.....vote NO, but do your job and vote. Would say the same thing if the situation was reversed. Healthcare: if the pubs would have done something about the medical facilities, doctors and pharmeseudical companys out of control cost, the affordable care act would not be in existence. Insurance companies have been and are out of control. Many people paid state farm and farmers premiums for 20 to 30 years, but after the two big hurricanes and they had to pay out so they dropped some of these customers. I absolutely disagree that it will never happen...ask Britains, Canadians and Australians. The question was would Obama sign a bill that prohibits gun ownership if given the opportunity. We can disagree on whether a bill would ever reach a president's desk, but again, hypothetically, if one inexplicitly does, would Obama sign it? I have no doubt as to the answer to that question. What do you think? I agree with you that many Democrats want gun ownership, but I will contend that number is shrinking. The Democrat leaders have adopted the policy of strict gun control and the Democrat constituents are not fighting them on this issue. Case in point, California, New York and pretty much most of the northeastern states and northwestern states. And as for high powered rifles, more people are killed yearly by hammers than by high powered rifles. You, Obama, and the Democrats are trying to solve an imaginative problem when pushing for "assault" (definition needed) rifle bans. The reason the Democrat leadership is so gung ho on banning "assault" rifles because it is a stepping stone leading to total gun control. That is very obvious to many of us. I'm not sure why many of the Democrat members can't see it. How many lives would be saved yearly if "assault" rifles are banned versus handguns? Please answer that question then ask yourself why the Democrat leaders are targeting "assault" rifles instead of handguns. I will go ahead and answer. It's not because they don't want to, it's because they can't. By getting some bans in place, say on "assault" rifles, they can use this as a counter to the "shall not be infringed" argument. Again, very obvious to many of us. Ask Joe Biden as to the reason for not voting on Garland. It's on video, a simple google search will provide you with his explanation. Why do you want government to solve everything? The cost to attend any NFL, MLB, NHL, NBA game is out of control. Should the government step in to "solve the problem". Maybe they can implement an Obamacare style plan in which the object is the reduce prices but the solution ends up raising costs even more. I'm kind of curious as to what would happen to these professional sports if the people showed unity and started boycotting them. How long would it take for the prices to drop versus government intervention. The people have the power to solve these problems, but you want government to do your job...the same government that begs these entities/companies for "campaign" donations. Quote
Englebert Posted September 2, 2016 Report Posted September 2, 2016 1 hour ago, nappyroots said: This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up I agree with much of what the author says. But he gives examples of some infringements on gun ownership by Conservatives but fails to mention the many, many restrictions instituted by Liberals. If a basketball team wins a game 120-2, you don't really need to concentrate on the 2 points given up like this author is trying to push. And if you want a scorecard to verify this, the NRA rates all politicians as to their adherence to Second Amendment rights. The overwhelming majority of bad grades are on the Democrat side, basically the same ratio as winning a basketball game 120-2. Quote
LumRaiderFan Posted September 3, 2016 Report Posted September 3, 2016 6 hours ago, Englebert said: I absolutely disagree that it will never happen...ask Britains, Canadians and Australians. The question was would Obama sign a bill that prohibits gun ownership if given the opportunity. We can disagree on whether a bill would ever reach a president's desk, but again, hypothetically, if one inexplicitly does, would Obama sign it? I have no doubt as to the answer to that question. What do you think? I agree with you that many Democrats want gun ownership, but I will contend that number is shrinking. The Democrat leaders have adopted the policy of strict gun control and the Democrat constituents are not fighting them on this issue. Case in point, California, New York and pretty much most of the northeastern states and northwestern states. And as for high powered rifles, more people are killed yearly by hammers than by high powered rifles. You, Obama, and the Democrats are trying to solve an imaginative problem when pushing for "assault" (definition needed) rifle bans. The reason the Democrat leadership is so gung ho on banning "assault" rifles because it is a stepping stone leading to total gun control. That is very obvious to many of us. I'm not sure why many of the Democrat members can't see it. How many lives would be saved yearly if "assault" rifles are banned versus handguns? Please answer that question then ask yourself why the Democrat leaders are targeting "assault" rifles instead of handguns. I will go ahead and answer. It's not because they don't want to, it's because they can't. By getting some bans in place, say on "assault" rifles, they can use this as a counter to the "shall not be infringed" argument. Again, very obvious to many of us. Ask Joe Biden as to the reason for not voting on Garland. It's on video, a simple google search will provide you with his explanation. Why do you want government to solve everything? The cost to attend any NFL, MLB, NHL, NBA game is out of control. Should the government step in to "solve the problem". Maybe they can implement an Obamacare style plan in which the object is the reduce prices but the solution ends up raising costs even more. I'm kind of curious as to what would happen to these professional sports if the people showed unity and started boycotting them. How long would it take for the prices to drop versus government intervention. The people have the power to solve these problems, but you want government to do your job...the same government that begs these entities/companies for "campaign" donations. Good question...tickets for any Broadway show are ridiculous...should they regulate play prices? Lots of things are expensive, and if you don't make enough money, you aren't "entitled" to them...want a nicer car, earn more money, want a bigger house, earn more money!  Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.