Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

From most reports he did very well today in his meeting with the Mexican president.  The president even admitted that we need to work on trade deals that are more favorable to the US.  

 

At least Trump is out working and not in hiding like Hillary.  

 

Posted

Read an interesting statistic today.  George HW Bush received 59 percent of the white vote in 1992.   He earned 426 electoral votes.   Mitt Romney received precisely the same share of that vote in 2012, for which he earned 206 electoral votes.  Draw your own conclusions...

Posted
30 minutes ago, TxHoops said:

Read an interesting statistic today.  George HW Bush received 59 percent of the white vote in 1992.   He earned 426 electoral votes.   Mitt Romney received precisely the same share of that vote in 2012, for which he earned 206 electoral votes.  Draw your own conclusions...

Based on just these stats, it sounds like the minority vote is becoming more and more monolithic and is responsible for electing Democrats who enslave them into socialist government programs. Is this the same conclusion you draw from these stats?

Posted
35 minutes ago, TxHoops said:

Read an interesting statistic today.  George HW Bush received 59 percent of the white vote in 1992.   He earned 426 electoral votes.   Mitt Romney received precisely the same share of that vote in 2012, for which he earned 206 electoral votes.  Draw your own conclusions...

Do you think Hillary will get blacks to turn out to vote in record numbers like Obama did?

Posted
12 minutes ago, PhatMack19 said:

Do you think Hillary will get blacks to turn out to vote in record numbers like Obama did?

Actually, I think the key demographic will be, as it has been trending in recent elections, the female vote.  Sorry Trumpsters.  

Posted
6 minutes ago, TxHoops said:

Actually, I think the key demographic will be, as it has been trending in recent elections, the female vote.  Sorry Trumpsters.  

So you're saying the Repubs should've nominated Brad Pitt :) ?  Probably better than the two we have.  

Posted
14 minutes ago, PhatMack19 said:

Do you think Hillary will get blacks to turn out to vote in record numbers like Obama did?

But to be fair and answer your question more directly, I think Trump will be far more instrumental in mobilizing the minority vote than Hillary, if you get my drift.  And I also look for a spike in Hispanic vote.  I would not predict record number is the African American vote but I also don't think you will see as big of a dip as one might assume.  Overall, I would think the "non-white" vote may even exceed 2012.  

But I would be the first to admit that while I enjoy looking at the numbers and data (to a nerdy degree if you ask my wife), I am by no means an expert on the subject.  

Posted
2 minutes ago, REBgp said:

So you're saying the Repubs should've nominated Brad Pitt :) ?  Probably better than the two we have.  

Lol!  Brad is out there but honestly it's hard to lower the bar from where we have it.  Besides, I'm more of a Matthew McConaughey guy \m/.  (Another one that's out there.)

Posted

Also becoming evident is that the 3rd party candidates appear to be pulling more votes from Hillary than Trump (just as, contrary to prevalent yet incorrect beliefs, Perot cost her husband more votes than Bush).  So much for the "a vote for Johnson is a vote for Hillary" fallacy...

Posted
15 minutes ago, TxHoops said:

Also becoming evident is that the 3rd party candidates appear to be pulling more votes from Hillary than Trump (just as, contrary to prevalent yet incorrect beliefs, Perot cost her husband more votes than Bush).  So much for the "a vote for Johnson is a vote for Hillary" fallacy...

If you're talking to a person that is undecided between Trump and Johnson, then the "fallacy" is true...a vote for Johnson is a vote for Hillary. If talking to a person undecided between Hillary and Johnson, then a vote for Johnson is a vote for Trump. If talking to a person that is either voting for Johnson or will not vote, then he makes no difference. Sounds like more Hillary/Johnson undecideds are waking up to the fact that she is an unconvicted felon and unfit to occupy the office.

I did see a poll today where Hillary's lead has shrunk to around 3 points. I didn't see (or it didn't say) what demographics have switched. Could be a mixture.

Posted
30 minutes ago, new tobie said:

She is the most questioned white women in the united states 

She hasn't done a press conference in over 9 months.  Women have gotten knocked up and already had the damn kids since Hillary last did a press conference!

Hiding Hillary is playing dodgeball trying to run out the clock until November.  Hopefully the left isn't that dumb not to recognize it.  

Posted
8 hours ago, TxHoops said:

Lol!  Brad is out there but honestly it's hard to lower the bar from where we have it.  Besides, I'm more of a Matthew McConaughey guy \m/.  (Another one that's out there.)

This is for you, Hoops!

FB_IMG_1472736647581.jpg

Posted
16 minutes ago, PhatMack19 said:

She hasn't done a press conference in over 9 months.  Women have gotten knocked up and already had the damn kids since Hillary last did a press conference!

Hiding Hillary is playing dodgeball trying to run out the clock until November.  Hopefully the left isn't that dumb not to recognize it.  

Didnt Mr Trump skip a couple of debates and squabble with a FOX news commentator 

Posted
22 minutes ago, new tobie said:

Didnt Mr Trump skip a couple of debates and squabble with a FOX news commentator 

1 debate.  What does that have to do with Hillary not doing press conferences?  Maybe it has something to do with her saying the wrong thing and ending up in prison.

 

Whether you like Trump or not, you do have to admire the fact that Trump is working his butt off. The guy is everywhere giving multiple speeches and appearances each day, while Hillary naps and fundraises.  

Posted
11 hours ago, TxHoops said:

Lol!  Brad is out there but honestly it's hard to lower the bar from where we have it.  Besides, I'm more of a Matthew McConaughey guy \m/.  (Another one that's out there.)

Mentioning Brad was to get the female vote.  The fact that many vote on the sex of a person, or race of a person, physical looks, etc, is alien to most of us.  If a green female hobbit, that was conservative was running in either of the major parties, I'd vote for her (would hope she'd wear shoes to State functions lol).

Posted
5 hours ago, new tobie said:

She is married to one of the greatest speaking politicians of all time, maybe she will get a little tutoring 

If she didn't get it in the last 40 years, its hard to believe she can get it in the next 60 days.  If she becomes a better speaker, does that absolve her of all of her dirty laundry?

Posted
14 minutes ago, stevenash said:

If she didn't get it in the last 40 years, its hard to believe she can get it in the next 60 days.  If she becomes a better speaker, does that absolve her of all of her dirty laundry?

To some that's all it takes...be a smooth talker.  Sends a tingly feeling up their leg.

Posted

When I think about it, I am surprised that the Dems don't absolutely love the Trump wall idea.   How can they not like something that is, by virtue of Mexico paying for it, a bit of "free stuff"?  Nothing appeals to them more than saying " I am going to give you this and I will make some other guy pay for it". ( the answer is probably that the free wall is not done via a tax hike)

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Member Statistics

    46,282
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    Unknown472929300
    Newest Member
    Unknown472929300
    Joined
×
×
  • Create New...