Jump to content

Jasper at Silsbee

tennisbc

By tennisbc
in High School Football

 Share

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 98
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Popular Posts

wosfan1992
wosfan1992

Non-District games means a lot. it helps your team confidence. nobody wants to go into district losing pretty much all of their non district games

BLUEDOVE3
BLUEDOVE3

Buddy, I knew I never shudda come over to the dark side. I am outta my league over here. Back to girl's volleyball for me.

WOSgrad
WOSgrad

More specifically, the only Silsbee team to defeat West Orange-Stark (2009) in 4A(3A) was 1-4 going into that game. They ran the table and won district that

tennisbc

tennisbc

Posted
  • Author
Posted
2 minutes ago, One4All said:

Maybe they do but, these non-district games don't matter to Silsbee...just preparing for district....

All non-district games matter, they help get you ready for district and the playoffs. They matter in the eyes of the players and fans and even the coaches. Non-District Games Matter

Link to comment
Share on other sites
AggiesAreWe

AggiesAreWe

Posted
Posted
4 minutes ago, tennisbc said:

All non-district games matter, they help get you ready for district and the playoffs. They matter in the eyes of the players and fans and even the coaches. Non-District Games Matter

I agree to a point. But I am ok with a team losing all their non-district games but winning all their district games and making a deep run in playoffs.

Just saying

Link to comment
Share on other sites
One4All

One4All

Posted
Posted
4 minutes ago, tennisbc said:

All non-district games matter, they help get you ready for district and the playoffs. They matter in the eyes of the players and fans and even the coaches. Non-District Games Matter

I agree that all non-district games matter, but I have been told by a bunch of "high-profile" Silsbee fans that they are only worried about district. #ALLGAMESMATTER

Link to comment
Share on other sites
tennisbc

tennisbc

Posted
  • Author
Posted
10 minutes ago, AggiesAreWe said:

I agree to a point. But I am ok with a team losing all their non-district games but winning all their district games and making a deep run in playoffs.

Just saying

I agree that district games are more important but yes even non district games matter

Link to comment
Share on other sites
tennisbc

tennisbc

Posted
  • Author
Posted
9 minutes ago, wosfan1992 said:

Non-District games means a lot. it helps your team confidence. nobody wants to go into district losing pretty much all of their non district games

You are correct, it helps confidence greatly if you win and believe in the system. Little steps are important as well but confidence is important as well

Link to comment
Share on other sites
AggiesAreWe

AggiesAreWe

Posted
Posted
12 minutes ago, wosfan1992 said:

Non-District games means a lot. it helps your team confidence. nobody wants to go into district losing pretty much all of their non district games

True.

But an example:

1998 Silsbee

went 1-3 in non-district with one of those losses to WO-S, 17-0

went 5-1 in district, losing to Dayton, 45-38.

made it to regional finals losing to state runner up LaMarque, 20-14.

Silsbee beat WO-S in first round of playoffs. ;)

So yes, non district games do matter, but not near as much as the "other" games.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Silsbee92

Silsbee92

Posted
Posted

I have seen several small personnel changes after each scrimmage and each game so far.  These small changes have made huge dividends in efficiency compared to the previous week.

Jones did not look comfortable at all in the PNG game.  Against Newton, 100% improvement in my eyes as far as recognizing how much time he has to throw. That's film and coaching at its best.  

Still sorting out the receiving core it seems. No T. Lowe yet and other than B. Newton, nobody has stepped up.

Maybe nobody agrees with me here but I felt Silsbee controlled most of this game but four plays would changed this game.

1) Int Non Call (hmm)

2) Dropped TD before half.

3) Dropped Slant

    (Nobody would have caught him)

4) 1st and Goal - No TD

Newton took the ball and scored directly after three of the four.  All of these were emotional let downs in my opinion.  Led to a lack of focus and the resulting scores.

Fixable.  It will come.

Newton did their job.  Capitalized on opportunities.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites
BMTSoulja1

BMTSoulja1

Posted
Posted
6 minutes ago, Silsbee92 said:

I have seen several small personnel changes after each scrimmage and each game so far.  These small changes have made huge dividends in efficiency compared to the previous week.

Jones did not look comfortable at all in the PNG game.  Against Newton, 100% improvement in my eyes as far as recognizing how much time he has to throw. That's film and coaching at its best.  

Still sorting out the receiving core it seems. No T. Lowe yet and other than B. Newton, nobody has stepped up.

Maybe nobody agrees with me here but I felt Silsbee controlled most of this game but four plays would changed this game.

1) Int Non Call (hmm)

2) Dropped TD before half.

3) Dropped Slant

    (Nobody would have caught him)

4) 1st and Goal - No TD

Newton took the ball and scored directly after three of the four.  All of these were emotional let downs in my opinion.  Led to a lack of focus and the resulting scores.

Fixable.  It will come.

Newton did their job.  Capitalized on opportunities.  

Yea, all these were mentioned...  The TD's that were left on the field.I know Barnes don't usually drop them, but like 3 or 4 he did and they should've been gimme's.  

Those guys will be ready next week...

Link to comment
Share on other sites
AggiesAreWe

AggiesAreWe

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, fishcat said:

You got that right Jasper does owe silsbee a butt whupping for what silsbee pulled after basket ball game

Are you kidding?

It was Jasper folks who jumped the Silsbee basketball team when they were heading to the bus.

But I do understand, losing to a team 126-72 at home would make me mad too. ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Member Statistics

    46,204
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    TJ_40
    Newest Member
    TJ_40
    Joined


  • Posts

    • baddog
      Has Everyone

      By baddog · Posted

      noticed that 99.99% of law enforcement sides with Trump? The part of the judicial system who disagrees with Trump is the prosecutors and judges….and it’s certainly not all of them either. Good thing he has the judges that really count on his side. 
    • LumRaiderFan
      Happy Thanksgiving To All!

      By LumRaiderFan · Posted

      Happy Thanksgiving 
    • baddog
      Newsom Proof

      By baddog · Posted

      What news station do you watch?…..never mind.    What age are the children you take care of. Refugees from where? Are they in a hospital? Now children compared to criminals…..geeeez. The mayor of Denver and a few governors, including Newsom, have said they will not turn over incarcerated criminals to ICE. This is a felony. They are harboring criminals and fugitives. Gee, I’m so glad you want criminals protected. Anyone who crossed illegally into our country is a criminal. Happy Holidays to you and yours.
    • Tiger33
      2024 WOS Mustangs

      By Tiger33 · Posted

      Sorry sir on my miss count. I was in hurry
    • Big girl
      Newsom Proof

      By Big girl · Posted

      Are they offering refuge to criminals? Or is it a Trump talking point? Refugees are people who leave their country due to unwarranted prosecution. I actually take care of 2 refugee kids who have complex medical needs   No, refugees are not criminals, and the assumption that they are more likely to be criminals than the general population is incorrect:                                                                                          Research shows immigrants commit crimes at lower rates Immigrants in the United States commit crimes at lower rates than the U.S.-born population, including unauthorized immigrants. This is true across immigrant groups.                  Immigration doesn't raise crime rates Immigrants don't raise crime rates in the communities where they settle. In fact, some studies suggest that immigration can lower crime rates, especially violent crime.                  Anti-immigration politicians have spread a myth Anti-immigration politicians have repeatedly tried to link immigrants to crime, but research shows this is a myth.                  Refugees don't cause crime in Turkey A study found that refugees don't have a causal effect on crime rates in Turkey. In fact, the study found that refugees may have a negative effect on crime rates per capita. 

  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...