Jump to content

Notre Dame at The University of Texas


UTfanatic

Recommended Posts

3 minutes ago, UTfanatic said:

Funny spin

UTEP is not Notre Dame.

Who this weekend for the Kyle Field challenge?

just found it Prairie View. 

Is it even on tv?

It's on SECN at 11am.

 

I'm headed to Cabo for the old lady's 30th bday.  I'll have to find somewhere to watch.  Hopefully I'll be awake by 9am Pacific time. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

35 minutes ago, PhatMack19 said:

Next weeks game is on LHN.  Let me know the rating for that one.  

Heck, I didn't even know that. I really don't worry about ratings, just winning. It appears we may do a lot of that this season. Just remember, LHN is for one team only, and we still make moola. Winning will only make it better.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, baddog said:

Yes, I have mixed emotions abut the gray hairs that fall out. It was gray, but it was a hair.

To expound on the catch where the ball was jarred loose......why is it that a runner can hold the ball out to break the plane and the ball can be swatted out of his hand or even fumbled but it is a TD? Same should go for a receiver....catch the ball with feet/foot down while breaking the plane. Play over....TD .

Carry on.

Because the running back already has possession when he's breaking the plane of the goal.  A receiver must gain possession of the ball.  The rules state a receiver must control a catch all the way to the ground for it to become possession.  If it's jarred out on the way down, he never possessed it, and thus cannot score a touchdown.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, bullets13 said:

Because the running back already has possession when he's breaking the plane of the goal.  A receiver must gain possession of the ball.  The rules state a receiver must control a catch all the way to the ground for it to become possession.  If it's jarred out on the way down, he never possessed it, and thus cannot score a touchdown.

Thanks, I knew the rule. Just don't like the control all the way to the ground, if he had possession and control while breaking the plane, anything after that is BS.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, PhatMack19 said:

This is the hidden content, please

You can never lessen the Longhorn victory as much as you try.

How about all the missed calls against Domers? ie, offensive pass interference!

You should worry about Prairie View, your next opponent, not Texas.

......67,132 different last names!

Hookem

Edited by UTfanatic
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2015 

Texas beats highly ranked ou team. 

Aggy say Sooners overrated, then Sooners make CFP. Not overrated.

2016

Texas beats a CFP contender. Aggy say missed call and domers overrated. We will see where how the season progresses both teams. 

After the aggy win Saturday, Longhorns posters said good game. 

Not one Aggy has said good game!

15 pages is long enough for game 1 of a long year.

horns up and Hookem

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

53 minutes ago, TxHoops said:

To be fair, I think AAW did say good game or something to that effect. 

 

2 minutes ago, PhatMack19 said:

Hey, I made a bunch of nice comments during the whole game. 

Man that guy was off his meds during the game, of course he overlooked the good comments by all. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 hours ago, baddog said:

Thanks, I knew the rule. Just don't like the control all the way to the ground, if he had possession and control while breaking the plane, anything after that is BS.

You gotta have some point of reference for when the catch becomes a catch.  If it falls out when or before he hits the ground, I'm fine with that not being a catch.  I mean, I guess you could say if he touches it with two hands it's a catch, but I prefer the rule as it is.  But Dez caught that ball against Green Bay :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Member Statistics

    45,993
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    PressBox Stats
    Newest Member
    PressBox Stats
    Joined



  • Posts

    • It’s a fact.  Are you not bothered with those?  Big girl also has an issue with facts.  Must be a liberal thing!
    • That’s kinda over-simplifying matters.    Are you talking about local politics or the platforms of the DNC/RNC? They’re two completely different scenarios.    To be frank, a politician couldn’t get elected in Hardin County as a Republican… until 2010-2011 when the locals all switched to the R Party.    I think that the truest example of a Democrat is the late George Wallace, Governor of Alabama. He ran in 1958 against a staunch segregationist and lost big time. Both Dems, btw. He came back in 1962 as a hardcore opponent of integration and won handily, becoming the racist spokesperson for a South that wanted to remain segregated. By 1982 he won his last term as Governor of alabama, still as a democrat, but carrying over 90% of the black vote.    Who switched? Was it the party? The politicians? The people? All of the above, in all different directions and over a period of about 60 years.   The problem with arguments about switching is that there are no constants.  We all know that guy…. southern accent, white-headed flat top haircut, short sleeve western shirt with those old wrangler double-knit pants. He probably held public office all over the south, and he had some really crazy ideas about race…. Might not have been in the Klan, but knew a bunch of people who were or had been. And he voted 100% Democrat.     We can all say “yeah, and he became a Republican after the civil rights act was passed!” And we’d be wrong.  The truth is that those old ideals and ways of thinking pretty much died off.    The truth of the matter is that the civil rights act passed the senate with a 71-29 vote majority.  But it’s interesting to point out that the 71 “yes” votes were actually 27 Republicans and 44 Democrats voting “for” the civil rights act, with 6 Republicans and 21 Democrats voting against the Civil Rights Act.  So which party was in favor and which one opposed?   And now 60 years later, with an ideological split in America, both sides are trying to claim moral superiority and cast blame over history that, to be frank, we don’t understand.    But to be honest, the Democrat party of 2024 is not what it was… and neither is the Republican. Just because things are so black-and -white today doesn’t mean that they always have been. 
    • We wont win the series, but it would be nice to get a win today before heading to Baltimore. 
    • Like who?  Do you have any names of actual applicants? Asking because I have not seen a list of applicants. 
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...