Jump to content

Port Neches-Groves 34 Lumberton 14/FINAL


WOSgrad

Recommended Posts

3 minutes ago, NDNation said:

Lol. It was red as fire. Geesh..i.need to go home and hook up to an IV to rehydrate. It was killer.

:)

2 minutes ago, GoBigBlue1997 said:

I remember a few years back posting a photo at MCM that showed an empty Port Neches stands at the start of the 4th in the reservation.  Don't try to act like your Honor-Pride-Tradition is any higher than anywhere else in SETX.  

Welp…… 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not to dog on McZeal, because despite it all he is a very important part of the PNG team, but man, I wish he had a little more Jayce Nelson/Kaleb Sparks/Jeremiah Rose/Spencer Deron/Caisen Sullivan etc in him. Those guys would catch anything in their zip code and kill themselves to get it done. I wish McZeal showed a little more fire. Again, he is a fantastic player and athlete, but I wish he was more reliable as a receiver. I think I agree with Broschon that he might be more effective at TE. Open up the middle for us for sure. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, GoBigBlue1997 said:

I remember a few years back posting a photo at MCM that showed an empty Port Neches stands at the start of the 4th in the reservation.  Don't try to act like your Honor-Pride-Tradition is any higher than anywhere else in SETX.  

Similar to the pic of the Nederland side at halftime vs WO-S? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, ROSCHONSBIGBRO said:

Sounded like yalls coach was making them run into a wall over and over. Short passes and screens could have helped

Bingo!! Or runnin same play 3 plays in a row on several occasions, that didn't help either. A little bit of blocking would have been nice too. Just got overpowered inside

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, jeter said:

Not to dog on McZeal, because despite it all he is a very important part of the PNG team, but man, I wish he had a little more Jayce Nelson/Kaleb Sparks/Jeremiah Rose/Spencer Deron/Caisen Sullivan etc in him. Those guys would catch anything in their zip code and kill themselves to get it done. I wish McZeal showed a little more fire. Again, he is a fantastic player and athlete, but I wish he was more reliable as a receiver. I think I agree with Broschon that he might be more effective at TE. Open up the middle for us for sure. 

yeah because them toned hands won't cut it,Rj threw a beautiful pass,my 11year old boy would have made that catch everytime,im not joking either,i just dont understand why he can't catch the ball,they will come back and bit you,well all i can say if he still can't catch by now he never will,butter fingers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Congrats to PNG on the win. We are not quite where we need to be to pull off that upset but we are getting there.  Coaches will continue to make these kids better. I thought both defenses played well and both offenses struggled. Our defense will keep us in games and or offense will continue to get better. Earlier, someone said it best that playing one game hurt us. I would agree but can't worry about that now. 

PNG QB is for real. Hard to believe he is just a soph.  Bright future ahead if he stays healthy and keeps a good head on his shoulders. Super impressive player. Keep working hard and he'll go anywhere in the country that he wants. 

Keep your head up Lumberton and keep listening to your coaches and believing in each other.  Do something to get better every day. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, ROSCHONSBIGBRO said:

thanks brotha

no problem brother,and your bro was balling out,he really can take control of a game,and wow just a soph,im very pleased at what hes able to do at this age,when this kids a senior you can't imagine how great he will be,he was very poised in there on 3rd and long with lumbertons side loud sounded like ned on that play and he just got it done and didnt let the presser get to him which i think is a big thing,if he wouldn't have made that td pass who knows how the game could have went because lumberton had some big momentum swings going there way from sloppy things on our end.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, jeter said:

What is going on with the PNG kicking game?

I dont know but if they dont fix it,that could cost us in a game winning play,or to tie a game,them points matter alot when your playing a Pam,or Ned,and any time could sneak under radar and put it on you,so they have got to figure it out,that riggs kid has a good leg he can make a 40+ with no problem,hes done it in practice many times,so i don't know what the problem is.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, L-Train11 said:

Bingo!! Or runnin same play 3 plays in a row on several occasions, that didn't help either. A little bit of blocking would have been nice too. Just got overpowered inside

i think the train will beat ned,just watch i have a feeling when they figure everything out,since we can't seem to get it done maybe someone else will get them,im not counting us out on ned btw,but i will believe it when were winning and clock ticks to 0,jmo,i think ned is in coach f head and he can shake it,will shall see,oh and Pam will beat them for sure.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

47 minutes ago, Gabe said:

PNG defense forced 6 4th down stops and limited Lumberton to 184 yards. That is all you need to know about this one.

Oh and maybe also the fact Roschon had 5 touchdowns, again. The kid is good.

Yeah and i know they put 14 on us but really only scored once,the other was a fumble run back,so not to bad,but they have got to hang on to that dang ball.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Member Statistics

    46,206
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    Ceb2000
    Newest Member
    Ceb2000
    Joined



  • Posts

    • It’s behind a paywall but here’s Baytown Sun’s story on it.  It was reported on in other papers statewide so if you search by the date I think you’ll find other stories on it. UIL strengthens student transfer rules By Ron McDowell [email protected] Oct 18, 2024   In order to maintain a level playing field for all member schools, the University Interscholastic League strengthened rules regarding transfer student eligibility at its most recent meeting in Austin. Every year thousands of students transfer schools in the state of Texas. A student’s ability to participate in UIL sanctioned activities may be limited base on the reasons for the transfer. A change in family status, work transfers, enrollment in an academic magnet program, or a move across town, receive scrutiny, but only rarely does one of these reasons result in the loss of eligibility. The only reason to automatically cause the loss of participation eligibility is a transfer for athletic purposes. The current rule, which has been in place since 1981, does not require a Previous Athletic Participation Form (PAPFs) to be submitted if the student-athlete does not participate in a varsity level sport during the first year of enrollment. There has been growing concern among some member schools, that other members are breaking the current rule and creating “super teams” with new transfer enrollees, and that the UIL is not doing enough to police, what appear to be, the inordinate number of transfers among high school athletes. To mitigate these concerns, the UIL approved a proposal to expand the power of the State Executive Committee (SEC) and allow it to investigate schools based upon the number of PAPFs submitted. Schools that submit an inordinate number of PAPFs would face heightened scrutiny and possible public reprimand and future sanctions. The UIL has also changed the requirements for PAPF submission, mandating that the form be submitted before a grade 9-12 transfer student may participate at any level of school athletics. This is a marked departure from the current policy which encourages schools not to complete PAPFs for students who transfer in, if the school believes that the student will not play a varsity sport in the first year the student is enrolled at the new school. Some critics of the current system think that the change doesn’t go far enough. Speaking on background, one local school district source suggested that there should be an automatic year wait for transfer students due to the number of loopholes in the waiver process. “If a student transfers, it should be a year out of competition automatically,” the source said. In addition, the UIL also approved a proposal that gives the SEC the power to appoint an independent administrator to oversee the conduct of the local District Executive Committee (DEC) if it is determined that the DEC is not consistently enforcing the rules of the governing body. The change is significant since all appeals that a school brings, starts and usually ends with the DEC. That includes the determination of transfer student eligibility. It is believed that with the implementation of this change, schools in a UIL district will be less likely to face retribution from the DEC chair and other members. The policy changes will go into effect, Aug. 1, 2025 This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up  
    • I was hoping WOS was going to win. To get another chance to redeem ourself. Silsbee did not look good in that game and has not played consistent during the season. Hopefully against La Vega they will play 4quarters of football
    • This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up   GCCISD paid a firm called PASA to compile this report ahead of them closing/consolidating some schools and redrawing attendance zones.
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...