Jump to content

So, which one was more unexpected?


BMTSoulja1

Recommended Posts

surely it was the Dayton loss. Vidor always comes to play with Central, but from what I saw Central looked worse than Nederland. They got to do some soul searching for sure. Thought second string QB played better than the 1st string QB did. Vidor looked solid on offense eating up a lot of clock. Have to give credit where credit is due, Mathews had them in beatdown mode. lol 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

awesome soulja!  I know that was a tough one

 

but on this topic Dayton all the way,  I mean they lost to a school that went 0-7 last year in a weak 4a district.  Only 3 wins and it was against two very small 3a school (sqeaked by on both) and Houston Kashmere.  They lost to LCM last year by like 50 or 60 and lost most district games by 40 plus.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, BMTSoulja1 said:

Not really.  I thought it would be good conversation.  I'm over that Vidor loss, believe it or not.  Lol

I'm not either! ! I know central has been in some tough battles with vidor.but Saturday I feel they took steps back.with 10 defensive guys back i thought they could handle the wing-t better. The offense could have easily put up 35 to 42 pts. We know the passing game isn't there.but neither is the running game. Ima a fan of all setx teams.but I'm not sure if they can get back in the race for a playoff spot. They still have to play png,Nederland, Memorial. I hope they can do it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

With Splendora coming in undefeated and after losing by 34 at home to BH, I think Central's loss and the way they lost to Vidor was more surprising. 22-5A folks may think Nederland is good but after Dayton almost lost to them I thought they would have trouble in district play. I still expect Central to somewhat contend for a playoff spot but I think Dayton will lose their next three games and start 0-4 in district play and 1-5 overall with that lone win being over Nederland.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dayton for sure,but a little warning=This Splendora team is big up front & they scheme/block well.I wouldn't get caught up in comparing w/l records from the past if I were gettin ready to play them.59 North corridor is booming,NC-Porter-Splendora are gonna benefit=build it & they will come.I'm not penciling them into a top 4 spot overall but it could happen.We played poor enuff to be 0-3.Been there many times before(just not any FW's-Elkins-Angletons-Ald Ike's in there lately)Dayt hasn't played good defense since (sorry brain fart=I don't remember,but I do remember the last real qb=Herrera 2011.Straight up we've gotten soft thinking a playoff spot is great(2 playoff wins past 4 yrs),until a team can contend for a dist title again we will struggle.Trying to be as positive/honest as I can,but past yrs have shown=push em too hard & they quit.Got this week vs Humble to fix things or 20 yr program starts over looking for 1 vs #21 it's how it is

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, liltex said:

Dayton for sure,but a little warning=This Splendora team is big up front & they scheme/block well.I wouldn't get caught up in comparing w/l records from the past if I were gettin ready to play them.59 North corridor is booming,NC-Porter-Splendora are gonna benefit=build it & they will come.I'm not penciling them into a top 4 spot overall but it could happen.We played poor enuff to be 0-3.Been there many times before(just not any FW's-Elkins-Angletons-Ald Ike's in there lately)Dayt hasn't played good defense since (sorry brain fart=I don't remember,but I do remember the last real qb=Herrera 2011.Straight up we've gotten soft thinking a playoff spot is great(2 playoff wins past 4 yrs),until a team can contend for a dist title again we will struggle.Trying to be as positive/honest as I can,but past yrs have shown=push em too hard & they quit.Got this week vs Humble to fix things or 20 yr program starts over looking for 1 vs #21 it's how it is

What do you feel in your opinion has happened to Dayton's offensive execution? I never got the offseason hype about the new coach but hasn't he gotten a lot more kids to come play in the program? Defensive issues can usually be solved with the extra depth but right now it doesn't seem like Dayton is as good on either side of the ball as they were last year with less depth. I've said many time on here that no matter the personnel Dayton has always been able to scheme up points on you, maybe the Bronco faithful took that for granted?  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Member Statistics

    46,206
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    Ceb2000
    Newest Member
    Ceb2000
    Joined



  • Posts

    • It’s behind a paywall but here’s Baytown Sun’s story on it.  It was reported on in other papers statewide so if you search by the date I think you’ll find other stories on it. UIL strengthens student transfer rules By Ron McDowell [email protected] Oct 18, 2024   In order to maintain a level playing field for all member schools, the University Interscholastic League strengthened rules regarding transfer student eligibility at its most recent meeting in Austin. Every year thousands of students transfer schools in the state of Texas. A student’s ability to participate in UIL sanctioned activities may be limited base on the reasons for the transfer. A change in family status, work transfers, enrollment in an academic magnet program, or a move across town, receive scrutiny, but only rarely does one of these reasons result in the loss of eligibility. The only reason to automatically cause the loss of participation eligibility is a transfer for athletic purposes. The current rule, which has been in place since 1981, does not require a Previous Athletic Participation Form (PAPFs) to be submitted if the student-athlete does not participate in a varsity level sport during the first year of enrollment. There has been growing concern among some member schools, that other members are breaking the current rule and creating “super teams” with new transfer enrollees, and that the UIL is not doing enough to police, what appear to be, the inordinate number of transfers among high school athletes. To mitigate these concerns, the UIL approved a proposal to expand the power of the State Executive Committee (SEC) and allow it to investigate schools based upon the number of PAPFs submitted. Schools that submit an inordinate number of PAPFs would face heightened scrutiny and possible public reprimand and future sanctions. The UIL has also changed the requirements for PAPF submission, mandating that the form be submitted before a grade 9-12 transfer student may participate at any level of school athletics. This is a marked departure from the current policy which encourages schools not to complete PAPFs for students who transfer in, if the school believes that the student will not play a varsity sport in the first year the student is enrolled at the new school. Some critics of the current system think that the change doesn’t go far enough. Speaking on background, one local school district source suggested that there should be an automatic year wait for transfer students due to the number of loopholes in the waiver process. “If a student transfers, it should be a year out of competition automatically,” the source said. In addition, the UIL also approved a proposal that gives the SEC the power to appoint an independent administrator to oversee the conduct of the local District Executive Committee (DEC) if it is determined that the DEC is not consistently enforcing the rules of the governing body. The change is significant since all appeals that a school brings, starts and usually ends with the DEC. That includes the determination of transfer student eligibility. It is believed that with the implementation of this change, schools in a UIL district will be less likely to face retribution from the DEC chair and other members. The policy changes will go into effect, Aug. 1, 2025 This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up  
    • I was hoping WOS was going to win. To get another chance to redeem ourself. Silsbee did not look good in that game and has not played consistent during the season. Hopefully against La Vega they will play 4quarters of football
    • This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up   GCCISD paid a firm called PASA to compile this report ahead of them closing/consolidating some schools and redrawing attendance zones.
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...