Jump to content

Livingston 32 Lumberton 28/FINAL


WOSgrad

Recommended Posts

4 hours ago, RaiderGirl2010 said:

He is another reason I'm contacting UIL. He was saying stuff like that all night

haha sounds like he Is a lot better than ole Reba. Listened to the announcers of the Nederland game talking about how she was such a pleasure to listen to at the games as an announcer, im thinking to myself this fool must have bumped his head lol, she was probably the most bias announcer that ive had the misfortune of listening to at a ball game. That and the annoying sponsored first down adds lol. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I believe that Nederland will have to give that one up, from what I heard Leday actually has a Port Arthur address, How could LN have overlooked this and let this happen. Kinda funny thinking That Livingston may be 2-0 here shortly. Im not sure how the Bulldog faithful is gonna like that verdict being 1-1 after the decision is made. Man this year has been crazy, must be the full moon!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

59 minutes ago, biaplayer said:

I believe that Nederland will have to give that one up, from what I heard Leday actually has a Port Arthur address, How could LN have overlooked this and let this happen. Kinda funny thinking That Livingston may be 2-0 here shortly. Im not sure how the Bulldog faithful is gonna like that verdict being 1-1 after the decision is made. Man this year has been crazy, must be the full moon!

Some kids have a PA address that go to Ned. From 9th Ave. To Twin City Hwy and 365 to Jimmy Johnson is NISD with a couple of roads being PNGISD. Now, if he has like an address off Savannah or something then that's different.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not pouring salt in the wound... But read my posts after last weeks game. I never seen Lumberton as a playoff contender... People can't take Livingston lightly... Nederland is not as bad as these Internet warriors think... They just put a beating on them... Lumberton plays with heart... I will leave it at that... Good luck on the rest of the season..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think in the next two to three weeks we will have a good idea of how the district is shaping up as for as playoff picture scenarios go sure the number 4 spot will be up for grabs. Looks like Vidor is playing mistake free clock eating football and putting up numbers as well. Could be an interesting district the way it is shaping up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Member Statistics

    46,206
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    Ceb2000
    Newest Member
    Ceb2000
    Joined



  • Posts

    • Here’s a link to another story about it This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up
    • It’s behind a paywall but here’s Baytown Sun’s story on it.  It was reported on in other papers statewide so if you search by the date I think you’ll find other stories on it. UIL strengthens student transfer rules By Ron McDowell [email protected] Oct 18, 2024   In order to maintain a level playing field for all member schools, the University Interscholastic League strengthened rules regarding transfer student eligibility at its most recent meeting in Austin. Every year thousands of students transfer schools in the state of Texas. A student’s ability to participate in UIL sanctioned activities may be limited base on the reasons for the transfer. A change in family status, work transfers, enrollment in an academic magnet program, or a move across town, receive scrutiny, but only rarely does one of these reasons result in the loss of eligibility. The only reason to automatically cause the loss of participation eligibility is a transfer for athletic purposes. The current rule, which has been in place since 1981, does not require a Previous Athletic Participation Form (PAPFs) to be submitted if the student-athlete does not participate in a varsity level sport during the first year of enrollment. There has been growing concern among some member schools, that other members are breaking the current rule and creating “super teams” with new transfer enrollees, and that the UIL is not doing enough to police, what appear to be, the inordinate number of transfers among high school athletes. To mitigate these concerns, the UIL approved a proposal to expand the power of the State Executive Committee (SEC) and allow it to investigate schools based upon the number of PAPFs submitted. Schools that submit an inordinate number of PAPFs would face heightened scrutiny and possible public reprimand and future sanctions. The UIL has also changed the requirements for PAPF submission, mandating that the form be submitted before a grade 9-12 transfer student may participate at any level of school athletics. This is a marked departure from the current policy which encourages schools not to complete PAPFs for students who transfer in, if the school believes that the student will not play a varsity sport in the first year the student is enrolled at the new school. Some critics of the current system think that the change doesn’t go far enough. Speaking on background, one local school district source suggested that there should be an automatic year wait for transfer students due to the number of loopholes in the waiver process. “If a student transfers, it should be a year out of competition automatically,” the source said. In addition, the UIL also approved a proposal that gives the SEC the power to appoint an independent administrator to oversee the conduct of the local District Executive Committee (DEC) if it is determined that the DEC is not consistently enforcing the rules of the governing body. The change is significant since all appeals that a school brings, starts and usually ends with the DEC. That includes the determination of transfer student eligibility. It is believed that with the implementation of this change, schools in a UIL district will be less likely to face retribution from the DEC chair and other members. The policy changes will go into effect, Aug. 1, 2025 This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up  
    • I was hoping WOS was going to win. To get another chance to redeem ourself. Silsbee did not look good in that game and has not played consistent during the season. Hopefully against La Vega they will play 4quarters of football
    • This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up   GCCISD paid a firm called PASA to compile this report ahead of them closing/consolidating some schools and redrawing attendance zones.
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...