West Orange-Stark 51 Silsbee 2/FINAL

[Mr. Buddy Garrity]

I'll handle this, hold on, let me start the other thread. 

[Sportsguy17]

Wos has allowed just 3 first downs in the last 2 games

 

[BMTSoulja1]

59 minutes ago, TxHoops said:

Gotcha.  When you said QB "is" their weakness instead of "was", it sounded more in general instead of one game (which would obviously be a silly comment).  

Good luck to the Tigers and #22 the rest of the way!

Thanks.

[78Stang]

17 hours ago, wo-s#1 said:

Well look like we been scored only with a safety for the holding, not sure about that rule....anyway shutout streak over let's ball nownow

I guess the streak is over sort-of. WOS actually scored on themselves. Right

[BMTSoulja1]

Smh. If the hold didn't occur, you might've gotten tackled in the end zone, that would have resulted in a safety.  Or worse, he might've fumbled and gave up a Silsbee touchdown... You held go stop the safety from happening...

[BMTSoulja1]

The hold happened at the front of the play, not behind the play.  

 

That throws out that ridiculous notion...

[TxHoops]

17 minutes ago, BMTSoulja1 said:

Smh. If the hold didn't occur, you might've gotten tackled in the end zone, that would have resulted in a safety.  Or worse, he might've fumbled and gave up a Silsbee touchdown... You held go stop the safety from happening...

It was called on #21 per the ref to the WOS coaching staff.  That's Shaw.  Who straight up pancaked the dude.  Shoulda called blocking too violently....

[kicker]

18 minutes ago, BMTSoulja1 said:

Smh. If the hold didn't occur, you might've gotten tackled in the end zone, that would have resulted in a safety.  Or worse, he might've fumbled and gave up a Silsbee touchdown... You held go stop the safety from happening...

Nope! I'm trying to post the vid but it won't let me. Straight up pancake, no hold.

[L-Train11]

4 minutes ago, kicker said:

Nope! I'm trying to post the vid but it won't let me. Straight up pancake, no hold.

KFDM tailgate party has it on their Facebook page.. Clearly a pancake

[BMTSoulja1]

So you're saying it wasn't a hold at all?

[L-Train11]

Assuming they called it on #21, I don't think so. I'm not an expert though, just my opinion 

[kicker]

3 minutes ago, BMTSoulja1 said:

So you're saying it wasn't a hold at all?

No it wasn't. I'm trying to post the vid but this site is jacked up.

[TxHoops]

4 minutes ago, L-Train11 said:

KFDM tailgate party has it on their Facebook page.. Clearly a pancake

Yep.  No doubt about it. 

 

3 minutes ago, BMTSoulja1 said:

So you're saying it wasn't a hold at all?

Not even close to a hold.  But to be fair to the refs, you don't often see a tailback laying the wood on a block like that so they were probably confused  

[kicker]

Grad, check your PM

[BMTSoulja1]

I just seen the video.  #5 for Silsbee was clearly held, which was the kick out block...

[L-Train11]

1 minute ago, BMTSoulja1 said:

I just seen the video.  #5 for Silsbee was clearly held, which was the kick out block...

Ok, I was watching #8 for Silsbee and assumed that's where they called it at. I stand corrected then

[kicker]

This is what a true leader says!

This is the hidden content, please

• Sign In
• or
• Sign Up

[L-Train11]

4 minutes ago, BMTSoulja1 said:

I just seen the video.  #5 for Silsbee was clearly held, which was the kick out block...

Ok I just went and rewatched, I see what your talking about.. But if that's the case that didn't look like it was in the end zone so it should have been half the distance to the goal line then right?

[BMTSoulja1]

...or is it where the offensive player is when the hold occurs?

[L-Train11]

I'm really not sure soulja, someone more intelligent than me will have to answer that. 

[TxHoops]

9 minutes ago, BMTSoulja1 said:

I just seen the video.  #5 for Silsbee was clearly held, which was the kick out block...

 

4 minutes ago, L-Train11 said:

Ok I just went and rewatched, I see what your talking about.. But if that's the case that didn't look like it was in the end zone so it should have been half the distance to the goal line then right?

A) Not the person the refs say the hold was on. 

B ) Not sure how that's clearly a hold when the blocker's hands were "inside" as they are supposed to be and when the Tiger spins around and chases, he does so cleanly, which would "clearly" indicate a lack of a hold. 

and C) L-Train's right, if that's the hold, safety should not have been awarded because it wasn't in the end zone.  

[Kj Dad]

 

 

[AthleticSupporter - Jock]

4 minutes ago, BMTSoulja1 said:

...or is it where the offensive player is when the hold occurs?

It's where the off player is standing. 

[wo-s#1]

Haha I called it kjdad back after the silsbee game...lol

[tennisbc]

Kj Dad, we knew you would be back, could not stay away.