Jump to content

Dayton Broncos vs Barbers Hill Eagles


Bronco94

Recommended Posts

18 minutes ago, CCRed said:

I do think you are probably right on the score but I don't think the teams are almost identical. The New Caney QB is a fairly good runner and there is not a Marte Allison at BH.  Big difference.

Very good analysis. I don't think BH has much trouble getting to 40 on Dayton, but every position group for New Caney is a little better than what BH has right now. As a unit I think BH's defense is equal to New Caney's though. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Boy, I would pay double to see is one but I'll be up 1942 watching the rebound game. With the group of kids Dayton has offensively this would've normally been a game where they just get on the field and out-athlete BH in the past, Dayton seems to have lost that ability though. Meanwhile BH is figuring out how to maximize their athletic ability with scheme and doing an excellent job. 

Game-wise I think Dayton might hit one or two big plays but will probably have to manufacture points due to BH's athletic deficiencies being negated by Dayton's sub-standard offensive execution. Put simply, Dayton is about to get outcoached for the third time in district play so far. That being said, I think this week against BH is still a better shot at a W than next week against Porter. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

52 minutes ago, bronco pride said:

Y'all have a 6" 190 lb running back that's probably going to lead the district in rushing just like NC.

Nope, but we are scoring about the same amount of points. We kind of hsve a runningback by committee, but who needs a leading rusher of the district when your winning. I did say almost, guess i should'vesaid scoring wise. I don't think we're that far behind personel wise either, but I'll leave that up to the experts.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think it will be a good game.  I still have faith in the broncos even if others don't.  This district is kind of like the SEC west.  We could all leave go to other districts and win them.  I enjoy the rivalry games between Dayton and The hill and Dayton and Crosby.  Dayton will get it together.  Good luck to everyone this friday

 

Go Broncos

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No matter how down Dayton seems to be at the moment I cannot see BH just blowing them out (I hope they will). BH will not look at this game as easy and come out playing 100%. If BH can take away the big play from Dayton they win IMO. This is a test to see how good BH is or can be.  Oh and it wont break my heart to see BH end the 20 year playoff streak :) Get'em EAGLES!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Coach Klien said:

If dayton can stop the run and not give up another 400 yard game i believe dayton may be able to sqeeze out a w by a fg.

 

Dayton gives up all those yards because they don't play assignment defense. New Caney basically ran four plays and scored all those points. BH can run but isn't really a running team anymore, the qb is a good runner but they throw it around the yard now. They score on you with scheme, they might not have the athletes New Caney does but their passing game is a lot more complex.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Member Statistics

    46,206
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    Ceb2000
    Newest Member
    Ceb2000
    Joined



  • Posts

    • Like I said, even if it’s only 10% of the 100 kids BHISD takes from GCCISD each year, that’s 10 athletes per year and that’s being generous.  You’re right about the jobs with BHISD, BTW.  There’s more than 1 athlete from Baytown originally who got transferred to BHISD after a job opened up for Mama.
    • Here’s a link to another story about it This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up
    • It’s behind a paywall but here’s Baytown Sun’s story on it.  It was reported on in other papers statewide so if you search by the date I think you’ll find other stories on it. UIL strengthens student transfer rules By Ron McDowell [email protected] Oct 18, 2024   In order to maintain a level playing field for all member schools, the University Interscholastic League strengthened rules regarding transfer student eligibility at its most recent meeting in Austin. Every year thousands of students transfer schools in the state of Texas. A student’s ability to participate in UIL sanctioned activities may be limited base on the reasons for the transfer. A change in family status, work transfers, enrollment in an academic magnet program, or a move across town, receive scrutiny, but only rarely does one of these reasons result in the loss of eligibility. The only reason to automatically cause the loss of participation eligibility is a transfer for athletic purposes. The current rule, which has been in place since 1981, does not require a Previous Athletic Participation Form (PAPFs) to be submitted if the student-athlete does not participate in a varsity level sport during the first year of enrollment. There has been growing concern among some member schools, that other members are breaking the current rule and creating “super teams” with new transfer enrollees, and that the UIL is not doing enough to police, what appear to be, the inordinate number of transfers among high school athletes. To mitigate these concerns, the UIL approved a proposal to expand the power of the State Executive Committee (SEC) and allow it to investigate schools based upon the number of PAPFs submitted. Schools that submit an inordinate number of PAPFs would face heightened scrutiny and possible public reprimand and future sanctions. The UIL has also changed the requirements for PAPF submission, mandating that the form be submitted before a grade 9-12 transfer student may participate at any level of school athletics. This is a marked departure from the current policy which encourages schools not to complete PAPFs for students who transfer in, if the school believes that the student will not play a varsity sport in the first year the student is enrolled at the new school. Some critics of the current system think that the change doesn’t go far enough. Speaking on background, one local school district source suggested that there should be an automatic year wait for transfer students due to the number of loopholes in the waiver process. “If a student transfers, it should be a year out of competition automatically,” the source said. In addition, the UIL also approved a proposal that gives the SEC the power to appoint an independent administrator to oversee the conduct of the local District Executive Committee (DEC) if it is determined that the DEC is not consistently enforcing the rules of the governing body. The change is significant since all appeals that a school brings, starts and usually ends with the DEC. That includes the determination of transfer student eligibility. It is believed that with the implementation of this change, schools in a UIL district will be less likely to face retribution from the DEC chair and other members. The policy changes will go into effect, Aug. 1, 2025 This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up  
    • I was hoping WOS was going to win. To get another chance to redeem ourself. Silsbee did not look good in that game and has not played consistent during the season. Hopefully against La Vega they will play 4quarters of football
    • This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up   GCCISD paid a firm called PASA to compile this report ahead of them closing/consolidating some schools and redrawing attendance zones.
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...