WOSgrad Posted October 5, 2016 Report Posted October 5, 2016 This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up 22-5A District Committee votes that Nederland must forfeit its win vs Livingston. Lions win 1-0. Bulldogs now 1-3 in league play. BigBlackBear 1 Quote
AggiesAreWe Posted October 5, 2016 Report Posted October 5, 2016 This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up BREAKING: The DEC has voted 7-0 in favor of the UIL's decision to strip Nederland of its Sept. 9 district win over Livingston. This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up SFA85 1 Quote
WOSgrad Posted October 5, 2016 Author Report Posted October 5, 2016 This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up The vote passed 7-0. Livingston and Nederland did not vote SFA85 1 Quote
#1stangfan Posted October 5, 2016 Report Posted October 5, 2016 Wow Aggie and Grad racing to break the news. Which of you is the Adam Schefter of the group? Jk Quote
WOSgrad Posted October 5, 2016 Author Report Posted October 5, 2016 4 minutes ago, #1stangfan said: Wow Aggie and Grad racing to break the news. Which of you is the Adam Schefter of the group? Jk I'm Shefter, AAW is Mortenson because he is taller. TexasPanther2012 and thetragichippy 2 Quote
NDNation Posted October 5, 2016 Report Posted October 5, 2016 4 minutes ago, indianforever said: Nederland loses 1st rd draft pick from memorial next year LMBO..Good one! Quote
78Stang Posted October 5, 2016 Report Posted October 5, 2016 What coach is in charge at the Dawg Pound- Michael Vick? Quote
wosfan1992 Posted October 5, 2016 Report Posted October 5, 2016 Why does Nederland have to forfeit? Quote
78Stang Posted October 5, 2016 Report Posted October 5, 2016 They call it CHEATING! Bobcat101 1 Quote
WOSgrad Posted October 5, 2016 Author Report Posted October 5, 2016 1 minute ago, wosfan1992 said: Why does Nederland have to forfeit? Nederland submitted an eligibility waiver for QB Kevin Laday, who played in Nederland's 51-9 win over Livingston. On Friday, the UIL notified Nederland that they had denied the waiver, but the decision to vote for a forfeit was up to the 22-5A district executive committee. They voted today that Nederland was to forfeit their win against Livingston. wosfan1992 and Bobcat101 2 Quote
Indianforever Posted October 5, 2016 Report Posted October 5, 2016 does the district executive committee consist of a representative from every school in the district Quote
NHSBulldogFan Posted October 5, 2016 Report Posted October 5, 2016 9 minutes ago, GCMPats / Free BG said: Probably means it is not from the UIL. I believe coach foreman from central got a similar reprimand a few years ago I just wish they would call it a reprimand instead of a private reprimand it's not private when everyone knows about it lol Quote
Bigdog Posted October 5, 2016 Report Posted October 5, 2016 8 minutes ago, 78Stang said: They call it CHEATING! Easy. Pot -> Kettle JoeBuck111 1 Quote
WOSgrad Posted October 5, 2016 Author Report Posted October 5, 2016 3 minutes ago, indianforever said: does the district executive committee consist of a representative from every school in the district Yes. Neither the Nederland nor the Livingston representative voted. Quote
XX Man Posted October 5, 2016 Report Posted October 5, 2016 I think all that is a crock. People and families move. Sure, there are a few that do it for sports, but very darn few. The rest are penalized for it. dj 1 Quote
Indianforever Posted October 5, 2016 Report Posted October 5, 2016 2 minutes ago, WOSgrad said: Yes. Neither the Nederland nor the Livingston representative voteds wow and it went 7-0 in favor of the forfeit Quote
WOSgrad Posted October 5, 2016 Author Report Posted October 5, 2016 1 minute ago, indianforever said: wow and it went 7-0 in favor of the forfeit Yep Indianforever 1 Quote
NHSBulldogFan Posted October 5, 2016 Report Posted October 5, 2016 Its also official that Nederland doesn't have the same pull as Katy does CAL2TEX, outanup, CLW321 and 1 other 4 Quote
Bigdog Posted October 5, 2016 Report Posted October 5, 2016 3 minutes ago, indianforever said: wow and it went 7-0 in favor of the forfeit This result was not really unexpected. Quote
Cougar14.2 Posted October 5, 2016 Report Posted October 5, 2016 15 minutes ago, WOSgrad said: Nederland submitted an eligibility waiver for QB Kevin Laday, who played in Nederland's 51-9 win over Livingston. On Friday, the UIL notified Nederland that they had denied the waiver, but the decision to vote for a forfeit was up to the 22-5A district executive committee. They voted today that Nederland was to forfeit their win against Livingston. Lol, I wonder how some of the "it's not official yet" Ned fans spin that one. The eligibility waiver wasn't approved, Neumann knew that AND STILL decided to play the kid anyway. When he saw what he was dealing with this year he just got desperate for the W, or is that still considered speculation now that the DEC basically relayed that notion with their 7-0 vote? mytwocents-28, WTXDAVE, Indianforever and 1 other 4 Quote
Indianforever Posted October 5, 2016 Report Posted October 5, 2016 1 minute ago, Cougar14.2 said: Lol, I wonder how some of the "it's not official yet" Ned fans spin that one. The eligibility waiver wasn't approved, Neumann knew that AND STILL decided to play the kid anyway. When he saw what he was dealing with this year he just got desperate for the W, or is that still considered speculation now that the DEC basically relayed that notion with their 7-0 vote? popcorn popping Quote
Indianforever Posted October 5, 2016 Report Posted October 5, 2016 curious to see how this will effect the team Quote
Brubaker Posted October 5, 2016 Report Posted October 5, 2016 6 minutes ago, Cougar14.2 said: Lol, I wonder how some of the "it's not official yet" Ned fans spin that one. The eligibility waiver wasn't approved, Neumann knew that AND STILL decided to play the kid anyway. When he saw what he was dealing with this year he just got desperate for the W, or is that still considered speculation now that the DEC basically relayed that notion with their 7-0 vote? The transfer/release was signed by PAM and filed with the UIL. The UIL saw something and contacted the school. Neumann immediately took action until the decision came down? No spin, just facts. There is absolutely NO way Neumann would put guys like Connor Perkins and Corbin Smith (2 time district champs and seniors) intentionally in jeopardy of something like this. This goes for all of his senior class. Your post above is straight GARBAGE lies, but fun for you I know. Long Tall Texan, BelichikYoSelf, pride at impact and 3 others 6 Quote
WOSgrad Posted October 5, 2016 Author Report Posted October 5, 2016 2 minutes ago, indianforever said: curious to see how this will effect the team Well, the immediate effects are this. The forfeit drops Nederland into the 6th place spot at 1-3 in district (1/2 game behind Central who is 1-2). What is of more concern, of the 4 teams that now occupy the top 4 spots, Vidor at 4-0, PAM and PNG at 3-0, and Livingston at 2-1, only PN-G does not hold a head to head tiebreaker over Nederland (as they have yet to play). As one poster stated in another thread, Nederland's playoffs begin on Friday. It will be interesting to see if the Bulldogs' play reflects that sense of urgency. biaplayer 1 Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.