Jump to content

Presidential Debate #2

PhatMack19

By PhatMack19
in Political Forum

 Share

Recommended Posts

PAMFAM10

PAMFAM10

Posted
Posted
23 hours ago, LumRaiderFan said:

Lol...and Hillary proves that democrats are smart?

Lol

Hillary was nominated because she was a good candidate to WIN. When she lost to Obama everyone knew she still favorited for 16'. So yes as in a couple of weeks you'll see it was a smart move. On the other hand republicans nominated the most unfit guy they could find while passing on Jeb swing state Florida kashic swing state Ohio and conservatives ted and Rubio. What was it like 17 total candidates and the GOP nominated the worst one. Seems pretty stupid to me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • Replies 139
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Popular Posts

LumRaiderFan
LumRaiderFan

She did give one truthful answer.  When Mack asked where the $800.00 comes from, she said "that's your problem (the taxpayer), not mine".

Whoopi Goldberg's Lips
Whoopi Goldberg's Lips

Jesus...I can not believe we're going to elect one of these people POTUS in less than a month. We're so screwed.

AggiesAreWe
AggiesAreWe

I may end up reversing my family's footsteps and swim back across the river.

baddog

baddog

Posted
Posted
22 minutes ago, PAMFAM10 said:

Hillary was nominated because she was a good candidate to WIN. When she lost to Obama everyone knew she still favorited for 16'. So yes as in a couple of weeks you'll see it was a smart move. On the other hand republicans nominated the most unfit guy they could find while passing on Jeb swing state Florida kashic swing state Ohio and conservatives ted and Rubio. What was it like 17 total candidates and the GOP nominated the worst one. Seems pretty stupid to me.

Cant believe thenbest for the dems was bernie or hillary.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
stevenash

stevenash

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, PAMFAM10 said:

Hillary was nominated because she was a good candidate to WIN. When she lost to Obama everyone knew she still favorited for 16'. So yes as in a couple of weeks you'll see it was a smart move. On the other hand republicans nominated the most unfit guy they could find while passing on Jeb swing state Florida kashic swing state Ohio and conservatives ted and Rubio. What was it like 17 total candidates and the GOP nominated the worst one. Seems pretty stupid to me.

Yes, the dems are really  really smart.  They have a candidate who is the most corrupt candidate to ever get in a Presidential race. ( makes Nixon look like an angel) PamFam, I am sure you are swelling with pride over the choice of your party.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
LumRaiderFan

LumRaiderFan

Posted
Posted
2 hours ago, PAMFAM10 said:

Hillary was nominated because she was a good candidate to WIN. When she lost to Obama everyone knew she still favorited for 16'. So yes as in a couple of weeks you'll see it was a smart move. On the other hand republicans nominated the most unfit guy they could find while passing on Jeb swing state Florida kashic swing state Ohio and conservatives ted and Rubio. What was it like 17 total candidates and the GOP nominated the worst one. Seems pretty stupid to me.

I sure didn't vote for Trump but here we are...and you can't say Bush or Kasich would be doing any better because you have no idea.

Hillary probably will win but the losers in this country will be business owners, energy companies, gun owners...folks that want to keep their health insurance...it's a long list.

The short term winners will be those that are dependent on the gov for a handout or the pay to play recipients from hillary's corruption.

Yep, you dems can say you won but she will continue to cause great damage to the country...now to vote for that is really stupid.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Big girl

Big girl

Posted
Posted
On 10/10/2016 at 11:38 AM, REBgp said:

Since she hasn't responded to your last question, I have to assume she is lying to the Govt.  it's a liberal prerogative.  Through the years, I've noticed when a Democratic politician is investigated, more often than not, they haven't been paying taxes.  It does explain why they don't mind voting for a tax increase, since they don't pay them anyway.  

 

I said we once owned a home health agency

Link to comment
Share on other sites
nappyroots

nappyroots

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, LumRaiderFan said:

I sure didn't vote for Trump but here we are...and you can't say Bush or Kasich would be doing any better because you have no idea.

Hillary probably will win but the losers in this country will be business owners, energy companies, gun owners...folks that want to keep their health insurance...it's a long list.

The short term winners will be those that are dependent on the gov for a handout or the pay to play recipients from hillary's corruption.

Yep, you dems can say you won but she will continue to cause great damage to the country...now to vote for that is really stupid.

To vote trump is asinine.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Whoopi Goldberg's Lips

Whoopi Goldberg's Lips

Posted
Posted
5 hours ago, PAMFAM10 said:

Hillary was nominated because she was a good candidate to WIN. When she lost to Obama everyone knew she still favorited for 16'. So yes as in a couple of weeks you'll see it was a smart move. On the other hand republicans nominated the most unfit guy they could find while passing on Jeb swing state Florida kashic swing state Ohio and conservatives ted and Rubio. What was it like 17 total candidates and the GOP nominated the worst one. Seems pretty stupid to me.

A good candidate to give you more free sh%+, amirite? Well you hit the nail on the head, applause all around!

Link to comment
Share on other sites
5GallonBucket

5GallonBucket

Posted
Posted
On ‎10‎/‎10‎/‎2016 at 5:45 PM, REBgp said:

Selecting Hillary to be President would be like selecting me to be your brain surgeon.

My wife told me this the other day via a post on another site she saw.  Electing Hillary is like hiring andrea yates to babysit your kids. 

I know Hilary will more than likely win and all the democrats will be "see I told you so" like they won some big competition.  I will not be surprised due to the election and re election of Obama......shows were society 's heading along with this nation. 

Thinking I just may start opening accounts overseas and living off the grid....catch me if you can.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
baddog

baddog

Posted
Posted
11 hours ago, LumRaiderFan said:

I sure didn't vote for Trump but here we are...and you can't say Bush or Kasich would be doing any better because you have no idea.

Hillary probably will win but the losers in this country will be business owners, energy companies, gun owners...folks that want to keep their health insurance...it's a long list.

The short term winners will be those that are dependent on the gov for a handout or the pay to play recipients from hillary's corruption.

Yep, you dems can say you won but she will continue to cause great damage to the country...now to vote for that is really stupid.

If the taxpaying backbone of this country, the middle class, isn't taken car of, the free stuff will vanish. Then what?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
PAMFAM10

PAMFAM10

Posted
Posted

Somebody show me where and when have I ever supported Clinton or said her winning will be good for America. I'm just living in the reality that she's a way more electable candidate than trump. 

If Texas played bama just because i say bama will win(which is the smart bet). Doesn't mean I like bama. Just living in reality.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Whoopi Goldberg's Lips

Whoopi Goldberg's Lips

Posted
Posted
15 minutes ago, PAMFAM10 said:

Somebody show me where and when have I ever supported Clinton or said her winning will be good for America. I'm just living in the reality that she's a way more electable candidate than trump. 

If Texas played bama just because i say bama will win(which is the smart bet). Doesn't mean I like bama. Just living in reality.

I'm not arguing that point...Nowhere above did I say you were supporting Clinton.  I'm merely pointing out the flaws in YOUR fundamental beliefs and how it relates to the conundrum we're faced with as a nation.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Member Statistics

    46,207
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    JBarry68
    Newest Member
    JBarry68
    Joined


  • Posts

    • EAGLEFOREVER
      Newton vs Daingerfield

      By EAGLEFOREVER · Posted

      Either way,one game lead in the series. I rely to much on word of mouth 
    • BADSANTA
      Waco La Vega (42) vs West Orange-Stark (20) - FINAL

      By BADSANTA · Posted

      West Orange Stark has been a powerhouse since I csn remember. At some point, your bound to fall off to some degree. Alabama has 3 or 4 loses this season. Who would have thought? Has Orange lost kids to LCM or even Orangefield?
    • Bordertown
      Port Neches-Groves vs Texas High

      By Bordertown · Posted

      Interesting matchup this Friday. Both teams have very good offensive and defensive lines, which will make this game interesting. Having watched Texas High all season, they have a wide open offense with very good skill players. If you look at their stats they run the ball 57% of the time and pass 43% of the time. Personally, that is a bit deceiving, as most of their games have seen reserves running the ball in the 4th quarter. I would estimate the primary offense is 50/50. Through 12 games they have run for 3,224 yds (48tds) and passed for 2,894 yds (32 yds). Potter, the Tiger QB, has been very efficient with a 69% completion rate and 1 interception (which came from a tipped pass). The passing is distributed primarily to 4 receivers…. Ball (865), Wrightner (811), Montgomery (532), & Pilgreen (392). The rushing comes from 3 running backs … Johnson (1,432), Ball (768) & Moore (716).  The Tiger defense is solid and very quick.    Hope #15 is healthy enough to play. He is a test for any defense. I was concerned about the Nederland RB, but felt Texas High did a good job containing him. I wish this game was in the afternoon, as Nachitoches is having their Festival of Lights and their will not be any rooms in the inns and restaurants will be full so plan accordingly. PNG are state champions until someone knocks them off, so I extend the Indians the respect they deserve. Pulling for the Tigers.  
    • wo-s#1
      Waco La Vega (42) vs West Orange-Stark (20) - FINAL

      By wo-s#1 · Posted

      The baseball coach has a ton of experience at high school and college level and hasn’t done anything for I think around 7 years now,it’s just something that the higher ups live with.And there has been talent come through that he hasn’t done anything with!
    • AggiesAreWe
      Setx Basketball Top Teams

      By AggiesAreWe · Posted

      If I had to point out one team that has impressed me the most; Barbers Hill

  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...