pakronos Posted October 24, 2016 Report Posted October 24, 2016 mods, please move the spam Gabe and studd88 2 Quote
Gabe Posted October 24, 2016 Report Posted October 24, 2016 Now before anyone goes crazy let me point something out that has been missing all day. Yes this piece is biased. That's because it's an opinion piece. It is not a story. The newsroom probably had very little if anything at all to do with this. Papers typically put an editorial board together and it comes up with the decision. Endorsements are not written to try and persuade votes. They are published across the country to give the newspaper a voice.  Whether you agree with the pick or not is one thing but the statements of "they are biased and this is horrible journalism" are far from incorrect.   Quote
Gabe Posted October 24, 2016 Report Posted October 24, 2016 8 minutes ago, pakronos said: mods, please move the spam Done. It's in political forum Quote
BS Wildcats Posted October 24, 2016 Report Posted October 24, 2016 20 minutes ago, Big girl said: HILIARY CLINTON!!!! Who cares? Â Quote
BS Wildcats Posted October 24, 2016 Report Posted October 24, 2016 23 minutes ago, Big girl said: HILIARY CLINTON!!!! Btw, if you're gonna endorse her, it's spelled Hillary. Â Bet Nash knew that. PhatMack19 1 Quote
baddog Posted October 24, 2016 Report Posted October 24, 2016 This is why I take the PA News. Better sports coverage and not a lot of hoopla. I also don't think that a business should say who their choice for president is. I bet everyone who works there is not for Hillary, so that is misleading. It even has little woman all excited. Big Girl, without mentioning Trump, tell me why Hillary should be president with more than one line, or because you like her, even though she calls you the "N" word. Quote
stevenash Posted October 24, 2016 Report Posted October 24, 2016 29 minutes ago, BS Wildcats said: Btw, if you're gonna endorse her, it's spelled Hillary. Â Bet Nash knew that. I did, but I have becum akustumed two the speling inkompatents and know longur fined it notewurthy. BS Wildcats and no-look 2 Quote
TxHoops Posted October 25, 2016 Report Posted October 25, 2016 So did the Arizona Republic (conservative paper that hasn't endorsed a Democrat for President in  its 126 years).  So did the Dallas Morning News (the first Dem its endorsed for President in more than 75 years).  And the Cincinnati Enquirer endorsed her as well (the first in almost 100 years).  Trump is that bad... Quote
BS Wildcats Posted October 25, 2016 Report Posted October 25, 2016 36 minutes ago, TxHoops said: So did the Arizona Republic (conservative paper that hasn't endorsed a Democrat for President in  its 126 years).  So did the Dallas Morning News (the first Dem its endorsed for President in more than 75 years).  And the Cincinnati Enquirer endorsed her as well (the first in almost 100 years).  Trump is that bad... But on the other hand, she's not a lot better, if any at all. Quote
LumRaiderFan Posted October 25, 2016 Report Posted October 25, 2016 Part of their endorsement... The newspaper went on to say that "above all Clinton must be judged against the other major-party candidate, Donald Trump. While she may be partially untrustworthy, he is completely unsuitable." In other words, he's pathetic, but in our opinion, she's slightly less pathetic. She's only partially untrustworthy...what world do these folks live in? But like Wildcats said, who cares? Quote
stevenash Posted October 25, 2016 Report Posted October 25, 2016 26 minutes ago, LumRaiderFan said: Part of their endorsement... The newspaper went on to say that "above all Clinton must be judged against the other major-party candidate, Donald Trump. While she may be partially untrustworthy, he is completely unsuitable." In other words, he's pathetic, but in our opinion, she's slightly less pathetic. She's only partially untrustworthy...what world do these folks live in? But like Wildcats said, who cares? MAY be partially untrustworthy? Â Whoever authored that statement is a long way from mental giantry. Â Heck, we might as well listen to what Michael Moore and Barbara Streisand think. Â There is much depth and forethought/reasoning to "may be partially untrustworthy." Quote
TxHoops Posted October 25, 2016 Report Posted October 25, 2016 46 minutes ago, BS Wildcats said: But on the other hand, she's not a lot better, if any at all. That's the rub. Â It's not like she's finally the Democratic nominee they've been waiting a century to endorse. Â BS Wildcats 1 Quote
BLUEDOVE3 Posted October 25, 2016 Report Posted October 25, 2016 3 hours ago, baddog said: This is why I take the PA News. Better sports coverage and not a lot of hoopla. I also don't think that a business should say who their choice for president is. I bet everyone who works there is not for Hillary, so that is misleading. It even has little woman all excited. Big Girl, without mentioning Trump, tell me why Hillary should be president with more than one line, or because you like her, even though she calls you the "N" word. Sounds like a typical oversimplified Trump supporter response. Would rather look at the pictures in the sports section than... Big girl 1 Quote
team first Posted October 25, 2016 Report Posted October 25, 2016 21 minutes ago, BLUEDOVE3 said: Sounds like a typical oversimplified Trump supporter response. Would rather look at the pictures in the sports section than... Than have to stand up to be seen?? Quote
undiscovered Posted October 25, 2016 Report Posted October 25, 2016 Not surprised that any media outlet would be anti Trump. He's called them out since the beginning and is still ripping them up. Why would they support him? No story here. Quote
baddog Posted October 25, 2016 Report Posted October 25, 2016 5 hours ago, BLUEDOVE3 said: Sounds like a typical oversimplified Trump supporter response. Would rather look at the pictures in the sports section than... I didn't think it was that simple, but it is what i believe. Typical lefty dodge is avoiding the last sentence entirely. .....look at the sports pictures.....comical. Quote
CraigS Posted October 25, 2016 Report Posted October 25, 2016 9 hours ago, TxHoops said: So did the Arizona Republic (conservative paper that hasn't endorsed a Democrat for President in  its 126 years).  So did the Dallas Morning News (the first Dem its endorsed for President in more than 75 years).  And the Cincinnati Enquirer endorsed her as well (the first in almost 100 years).  Trump is that bad... Fair enough. BUT....Clinton is a career politician, has the household name of a past President (husband at that), most career politicians back her (even some big name GOP).....first potential woman president......yet.......she still may lose..even with all of Trumps gaffs..No tax return (not that matters anyway)........Clinton is that bad... Quote
RETIREDFAN1 Posted October 25, 2016 Report Posted October 25, 2016 Beaumont Enterprise??? I thought that bird cage liner went out of business years ago......... liltex, baddog and Hagar 3 Quote
new tobie Posted October 25, 2016 Report Posted October 25, 2016 Just in.......the lumberton ledger is endorsing trump LumRaiderFan 1 Quote
Big girl Posted October 25, 2016 Author Report Posted October 25, 2016 14 hours ago, TxHoops said: So did the Arizona Republic (conservative paper that hasn't endorsed a Democrat for President in  its 126 years).  So did the Dallas Morning News (the first Dem its endorsed for President in more than 75 years).  And the Cincinnati Enquirer endorsed her as well (the first in almost 100 years).  Trump is that bad... Yes, he is. Quote
Big girl Posted October 25, 2016 Author Report Posted October 25, 2016 The National Enquirer endorsed Trump, that should count for something. Lmbo Quote
Big girl Posted October 25, 2016 Author Report Posted October 25, 2016 2 hours ago, new tobie said: Just in.......the lumberton ledger is endorsing trump Roflmbo Quote
Big girl Posted October 25, 2016 Author Report Posted October 25, 2016 4 hours ago, CraigS said: Fair enough. BUT....Clinton is a career politician, has the household name of a past President (husband at that), most career politicians back her (even some big name GOP).....first potential woman president......yet.......she still may lose..even with all of Trumps gaffs..No tax return (not that matters anyway)........Clinton is that bad... I think it has been 20 plus  years since they endorsed a Democratic nominee. Drum roll please.......they endorsed Bill Clinton Quote
Big girl Posted October 25, 2016 Author Report Posted October 25, 2016 4 hours ago, CraigS said: Fair enough. BUT....Clinton is a career politician, has the household name of a past President (husband at that), most career politicians back her (even some big name GOP).....first potential woman president......yet.......she still may lose..even with all of Trumps gaffs..No tax return (not that matters anyway)........Clinton is that bad... She is not going to lose Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.