Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
21 minutes ago, BS Wildcats said:

If this had been taken further, as it should have been, she would have charged.  Bill made sure that would not happen with the meeting on the airplane in Phoenix. The legalities are not conjecture, but fact.  The FBI and others decided not to indict.

Yeah right. Do you really believe that Bill has that much power? You guys act as if Hillary is Lex Luthor.

Posted
31 minutes ago, BS Wildcats said:

If this had been taken further, as it should have been, she would have charged.  Bill made sure that would not happen with the meeting on the airplane in Phoenix. The legalities are not conjecture, but fact.  The FBI and others decided not to indict.

Tt

Posted

Big Girl_ I am going to ask the question once more since you ignored it before:  And you "know", for a fact, that it was Mr. Trump who was behind the keyboard on each tweet?  If you believe what he said in the debates, then you also believe that he is a highly successful businessman who  built a substantial business empire and will make America great again and that Mrs. Clinton is crooked- since he also made those statements in the debates.  Oh wait- are you now going to tell me that you get to pick and choose which statements you believe?

Posted
11 hours ago, stevenash said:

Big Girl_ I am going to ask the question once more since you ignored it before:  And you "know", for a fact, that it was Mr. Trump who was behind the keyboard on each tweet?  If you believe what he said in the debates, then you also believe that he is a highly successful businessman who  built a substantial business empire and will make America great again and that Mrs. Clinton is crooked- since he also made those statements in the debates.  Oh wait- are you now going to tell me that you get to pick and choose which statements you believe?

11 hours ago, stevenash said:

Big Girl_ I am going to ask the question once more since you ignored it before:  And you "know", for a fact, that it was Mr. Trump who was behind the keyboard on each tweet?  If you believe what he said in the debates, then you also believe that he is a highly successful businessman who  built a substantial business empire and will make America great again and that Mrs. Clinton is crooked- since he also made those statements in the debates.  Oh wait- are you now going to tell me that you get to pick and choose which statements you believe?

This is the hidden content, please
  

Some of Hilliary's accomplishments.

Posted

I can understand why you wont answer my ;questions and, instead, simply post something you posted earlier.  Why dont you go ahead and post "some of Hillary's accomplishments" again in response to this post.  Many will be impressed.

Posted
16 minutes ago, REBgp said:

It's laughable that this whole political forum can be condensed down to one line from the movie Cool Hand Luke - What we have here is a failure to communicate. :) 

Perhaps because "some" are maladroit when it comes to communicating?

Posted
On ‎10‎/‎25‎/‎2016 at 8:33 PM, TxHoops said:

So did the Arizona Republic (conservative paper that hasn't endorsed a Democrat for President in  its 126 years).  So did the Dallas Morning News (the first Dem its endorsed for President in more than 75 years).  And the Cincinnati Enquirer endorsed her as well (the first in almost 100 years).  

Trump is that bad...

They are both bad.  papers endorsing anything doesn't hold weight for me.....they re media .......only prints what sells no matter what

Posted
55 minutes ago, 5GallonBucket said:

They are both bad.  papers endorsing anything doesn't hold weight for me.....they re media .......only prints what sells no matter what

I can't imagine anyone making a choice based on a newspaper endorsement.  I guess it may happen with some people but has to be pretty rare.  It's a time-honored tradition though and does speak to how awful the Donald is that some are endorsing a Dem after a 100+ years of refusing to do so.  

Posted

Heard a radio commentator this morning say he believes that some people don't need to vote.  When pressed for specificity, he said that if you know who the spouses of Beyoncé and Kanye West are, can name at least three members of the Kardashian family, and have never heard of Benghazi, you shouldn't be voting.

Posted
2 hours ago, stevenash said:

Heard a radio commentator this morning say he believes that some people don't need to vote.  When pressed for specificity, he said that if you know who the spouses of Beyoncé and Kanye West are, can name at least three members of the Kardashian family, and have never heard of Benghazi, you shouldn't be voting.

I'm all over that.  I remember a fortune teller on late night TV, Miss Cleo.  I said at the time, anyone who calls here should have their right to vote revoked.  This guy has taken it further.

Seriously, before someone votes, they ought at least be able to name the president, the VP, and their two senators.  Is that to much to ask?  And I'd bet that at least 50% of the people voting now, couldn't do it.  Instead of voting, why don't we just throw a dart at a board.  Smh

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Member Statistics

    46,282
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    Unknown472929300
    Newest Member
    Unknown472929300
    Joined
×
×
  • Create New...