Jump to content

FBI reopens Clinton email investigation


PhatMack19

Recommended Posts

18 hours ago, BLUEDOVE3 said:

This is ABOUT the  FBI director.  Dude has no clue what's on these emails. Food recipes,  homework assignments,  GOP ho-hum as usual,  or more GOP hoe -hum? I'm sstill waiting for all the BISD administrators who were gonna be going to jail  and... ooops, that's for another thread

He said he didn't have any idea what is on the emails.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I realize the fifth amendment is a right we all have.  I also realize that you take it to avoid incriminating yourself.  Don't know how many have taken the fifth during this investigation, but quite a few.  The one drawback to the fifth is that it hampers investigators from getting to the truth.  Legally, we have to live with that.  That being said, how many of you think there was absolutely, positively, nothing illegal going on, when you have so many people taking the fifth?  And if so, why are so many using that right?

To put it in our terms, there's so much smoke, there has to be a fire.  Now, if someone can show the fallacy on my post, please do so.  I'm willing to learn.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

35 minutes ago, REBgp said:

I realize the fifth amendment is a right we all have.  I also realize that you take it to avoid incriminating yourself.  Don't know how many have taken the fifth during this investigation, but quite a few.  The one drawback to the fifth is that it hampers investigators from getting to the truth.  Legally, we have to live with that.  That being said, how many of you think there was absolutely, positively, nothing illegal going on, when you have so many people taking the fifth?  And if so, why are so many using that right?

To put it in our terms, there's so much smoke, there has to be a fire.  Now, if someone can show the fallacy on my post, please do so.  I'm willing to learn.

Great post REB, as always. Only thing I want to add is that pleading the 5th amendment is that you have the right not to incriminate yourself. It does not make you immune to prosecution. There are others who can incriminate you.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

38 minutes ago, REBgp said:

I realize the fifth amendment is a right we all have.  I also realize that you take it to avoid incriminating yourself.  Don't know how many have taken the fifth during this investigation, but quite a few.  The one drawback to the fifth is that it hampers investigators from getting to the truth.  Legally, we have to live with that.  That being said, how many of you think there was absolutely, positively, nothing illegal going on, when you have so many people taking the fifth?  And if so, why are so many using that right?

To put it in our terms, there's so much smoke, there has to be a fire.  Now, if someone can show the fallacy on my post, please do so.  I'm willing to learn.

Big Girl, PamFam, and NewTobie and the now departed (RIP) EnlightenedChosenOne.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

33 minutes ago, stevenash said:

Big Girl, PamFam, and NewTobie and the now departed (RIP) EnlightenedChosenOne.

Whoa, whoa, whoa...you can't lump PamFam into that group.  After all, he's said he doesn't like Hillary...he's just rubbing her perceptual lead in our faces every chance he gets.  Take that for what it's worth...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

54 minutes ago, Whoopi Goldberg's Lips said:

Man, I hope you're wrong!  I hate to believe our moral compass in this country has eroded to the point that we'll elect a child predator as POTUS.  As a father of 3, this makes me ragey...

There are LOTS of folks that will vote for her no matter what...we've got some on this forum.

I feel you...can't understand the loyalty, especially when she has done NOTHING to deserve it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, LumRaiderFan said:

There are LOTS of folks that will vote for her no matter what...we've got some on this forum.

I feel you...can't understand the loyalty, especially when she has done NOTHING to deserve it.

It's not the loyalty issue- it's the "mean things" he said to a few people.  They have been indoctrinated to believe that this is the important issue, dishonestly and criminality be damned.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How is it even possible that she is part of this election?  LEGALLY????? 

Someone with greater knowledge of the law/legal system/running for office......how does that work.

In my opinion someone with these claims should not be allowed to even participate in election for the highest office in this country and possible the world.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Member Statistics

    46,229
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    Aaronhicks
    Newest Member
    Aaronhicks
    Joined



  • Posts

    • I have no issue with that however…. Rick Perry, although seemingly not really popular even with Republicans, was almost impossible to beat. The Texas conservatives just needed that tough, real conservative with an already popular voting base. Someone that has been elected to both Texas state office and federal office.  Boom! In 2010 in steps Kay Bailey Hutchison, a popular sitting US Senator and former Texas Treasurer. So she has been elected, statewide in both a state political position and nationally as a senator. A Rasmussen poll in 2009 showed Hutchison with a 40% to 38% lead over Perry. She had high profile endorsements as did Perry. Hutchison was endorsed by the likes of G H W Bush, Nolan Ryan, Roger Staubach, etc. If people are actually going to listen to endorsements, those are some fairly well thought of people in Texas. Primary day was between Perry, Hutchison and Debra Medina. Hutchison was beaten by Perry 51% to 30% and he got enough votes to avoid a runoff. Obviously, that has no bearing on today. It does show that just because a person is very popular and already elected to national office from Texas such as Kay Bailey Hutchison, it does not ensure a good showing in the polls against an incumbent. It will be interesting for sure. 
    • WOW what a game. just got home, I'm gonna sleep with a big smile all night. PNG QB passes were spot on tonight, lil #17 freshman receiver had huge catches at critical times in the game. # 44 had a couple of huge catches including the 'jump pass' on 4th down for a touchdown.  #4 made big plays at key times on both sides of the ball, he is a beast. #11 played his usual consistent game with big time catches and a couple of good punts and a good job of just falling on a bobbled kick reception. #27 probably had 125 yards or so rushing. The defensive backs did a good job, bending but not breaking including the interception in the end zone. I thought the TH coaches messed up not trying to score with the high power players they have when they got the fumble right before half with 45 seconds or so on the clock and 3 TO left, if they would have scored then it would have broke our backs. I know it was 90 yards to go but they could cover the field in 3 or 4 plays. This is one of the most exciting wins in PNG's long history of exciting wins. Oh yeah kudos to the fans for getting in to the game at key times and in my Opinion making a big difference. 😂
    • To the 41 individuals that picked TH…..🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 Round 4 here we come!  
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...