Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
4 hours ago, team first said:

I wonder why txhoops hasn't updated us all on the recent betting lines. 

 

Clinton -300

Trump +210. 

Still not too late to double your money on the Trumpster!!

Posted
52 minutes ago, TxHoops said:

But more importantly, Nate Silver (who is the best in the biz, period) has him up to a 35% chance of winning the election.   He was at like 15% a few weeks ago.  Quite a surge. 

What has caused Mr. Silver to alter his prediction?  Surely he and you not dare to admit that Mrs. Clinton has an "ever so slightly" flawed character?  Isn't it Trump who is the bad guy and Mrs. Clinton is as pure as the wind driven snow and all of this controversy is simply a continuation of that infamous "vast right wing conspiracy"?

Posted
1 hour ago, stevenash said:

What has caused Mr. Silver to alter his prediction?  Surely he and you not dare to admit that Mrs. Clinton has an "ever so slightly" flawed character?  Isn't it Trump who is the bad guy and Mrs. Clinton is as pure as the wind driven snow and all of this controversy is simply a continuation of that infamous "vast right wing conspiracy"?

It's that time of the year for Hoops.  His mind and thoughts are no longer on something as mundane as the run for president.  He hears the sound of the swish of the net, balls being dribbled, the leap and the slam dunk.  He is now useless as a potential presidential analyst.  If you want to know if PAM beats Ozen in basketball, he's your man.  Right now, he wouldn't know a qualified politician from a Nebraska farmer. :) 

Posted
1 hour ago, stevenash said:

What has caused Mr. Silver to alter his prediction?  Surely he and you not dare to admit that Mrs. Clinton has an "ever so slightly" flawed character?  Isn't it Trump who is the bad guy and Mrs. Clinton is as pure as the wind driven snow and all of this controversy is simply a continuation of that infamous "vast right wing conspiracy"?

 

Silver's prediction is based on a wide array of polling, none of which is his.  He's a math guy, not a pollster.  Any personal or subjective thoughts he may have is not factored in, obviously.   And after getting 99 out of 100 states correctly in the last 2 elections, I would say is better than most, if not all who do his type of work.  

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Member Statistics

    46,282
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    Unknown472929300
    Newest Member
    Unknown472929300
    Joined


×
×
  • Create New...