PhatMack19 Posted November 4, 2016 Report Share Posted November 4, 2016 and I'm not talking about Taco Bell. They have to get in before Trump builds that wall. This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
team first Posted November 4, 2016 Report Share Posted November 4, 2016 I wonder why txhoops hasn't updated us all on the recent betting lines. LumRaiderFan 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PhatMack19 Posted November 4, 2016 Author Report Share Posted November 4, 2016 18 minutes ago, team first said: I wonder why txhoops hasn't updated us all on the recent betting lines. Hillary -230, Trump +180 Hillary was like -800 last week Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TxHoops Posted November 4, 2016 Report Share Posted November 4, 2016 4 hours ago, team first said: I wonder why txhoops hasn't updated us all on the recent betting lines. Clinton -300 Trump +210. Still not too late to double your money on the Trumpster!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TxHoops Posted November 4, 2016 Report Share Posted November 4, 2016 But more importantly, Nate Silver (who is the best in the biz, period) has him up to a 35% chance of winning the election. He was at like 15% a few weeks ago. Quite a surge. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Whoopi Goldberg's Lips Posted November 4, 2016 Report Share Posted November 4, 2016 4 minutes ago, TxHoops said: But more importantly, Nate Silver (who is the best in the biz, period) has him up to a 35% chance of winning the election. He was at like 15% a few weeks ago. Quite a surge. Only a degenerate would know these facts, Hoops!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TxHoops Posted November 4, 2016 Report Share Posted November 4, 2016 1 minute ago, Whoopi Goldberg's Lips said: Only a degenerate would know these facts, Hoops!! As my old man would say, I resemble that statement. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stevenash Posted November 4, 2016 Report Share Posted November 4, 2016 52 minutes ago, TxHoops said: But more importantly, Nate Silver (who is the best in the biz, period) has him up to a 35% chance of winning the election. He was at like 15% a few weeks ago. Quite a surge. What has caused Mr. Silver to alter his prediction? Surely he and you not dare to admit that Mrs. Clinton has an "ever so slightly" flawed character? Isn't it Trump who is the bad guy and Mrs. Clinton is as pure as the wind driven snow and all of this controversy is simply a continuation of that infamous "vast right wing conspiracy"? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hagar Posted November 4, 2016 Report Share Posted November 4, 2016 1 hour ago, stevenash said: What has caused Mr. Silver to alter his prediction? Surely he and you not dare to admit that Mrs. Clinton has an "ever so slightly" flawed character? Isn't it Trump who is the bad guy and Mrs. Clinton is as pure as the wind driven snow and all of this controversy is simply a continuation of that infamous "vast right wing conspiracy"? It's that time of the year for Hoops. His mind and thoughts are no longer on something as mundane as the run for president. He hears the sound of the swish of the net, balls being dribbled, the leap and the slam dunk. He is now useless as a potential presidential analyst. If you want to know if PAM beats Ozen in basketball, he's your man. Right now, he wouldn't know a qualified politician from a Nebraska farmer. TxHoops 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TxHoops Posted November 4, 2016 Report Share Posted November 4, 2016 1 hour ago, stevenash said: What has caused Mr. Silver to alter his prediction? Surely he and you not dare to admit that Mrs. Clinton has an "ever so slightly" flawed character? Isn't it Trump who is the bad guy and Mrs. Clinton is as pure as the wind driven snow and all of this controversy is simply a continuation of that infamous "vast right wing conspiracy"? Silver's prediction is based on a wide array of polling, none of which is his. He's a math guy, not a pollster. Any personal or subjective thoughts he may have is not factored in, obviously. And after getting 99 out of 100 states correctly in the last 2 elections, I would say is better than most, if not all who do his type of work. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stevenash Posted November 4, 2016 Report Share Posted November 4, 2016 It is apparent to me that his data or the manner in which he "quantifies" his data has changed significantly recently. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.