Westbrook Eligibility

[Football52]

I saw the minutes from the UIL executive meeting, and noticed that two different WB eligibility questions were raised. One denied, one upheld. Anyone know if either of these applied to the kid from HJ?

[AggiesAreWe]

15 minutes ago, Football52 said:

I saw the minutes from the UIL executive meeting, and noticed that two different WB eligibility questions were raised. One denied, one upheld. Anyone know if either of these applied to the kid from HJ?

 

15 minutes ago, Football52 said:

I saw the minutes from the UIL executive meeting, and noticed that two different WB eligibility questions were raised. One denied, one upheld. Anyone know if either of these applied to the kid from HJ?

 

It' my understanding the Carpenter kid was ruled eligible, the Parquet kid ruled ineligible.

[BLUEDOVE3]

44 minutes ago, AggiesAreWe said:

 

 

It' my understanding the Carpenter kid was ruled eligible, the Parquet kid ruled ineligible.

I can't remember but the Carpenter leave WB to HJ or vice versa? I brought him up on the forum some weeks ago.

[AggiesAreWe]

7 minutes ago, BLUEDOVE3 said:

I can't remember but the Carpenter leave WB to HJ or vice versa? I brought him up on the forum some weeks ago.

Was in the BISD middle schools, then went to HJ for his freshman year (last year). He is now back at West Brook.

[winwin]

11 minutes ago, AggiesAreWe said:

Was in the BISD middle schools, then went to HJ for his freshman year (last year). He is now back at West Brook.

And has always lived in the West Brook zone. HJ has open enrollment. 

[AggiesAreWe]

24 minutes ago, winwin said:

And has always lived in the West Brook zone. HJ has open enrollment. 

Correct

[kingjames]

1 hour ago, AggiesAreWe said:

 

 

It' my understanding the Carpenter kid was ruled eligible, the Parquet kid ruled ineligible.

Unfortunate for the kid that was ruled ineligible. Parents should educate themselves on the rules better so that the kids want have to lose a year of varsity sports no one lose her but the kid.

[aTmfan06]

He shouldn't have left HJ

[Mamba]

Sometimes just keeping your mouth shut isnt so bad 

[BADSANTA]

Parquet can't play this year? That isn't cool at all. 

[kingjames]

9 minutes ago, aTmfan06 said:

He shouldn't have left HJ

 

7 minutes ago, BlkMamba24 said:

Sometimes just keeping your mouth shut isnt so bad 

First off who am I to say where the kids should've stayed I was just making a point if you gonna move kid make sure you know the rules. Apparently it was an issue at HJ for the parents to move the kid and that's the right of the parents and kid just know the rules.

Secondly Mamba you're correct but sometimes people can't do that for the better of the kid. I figured it would be a losing battle you have to pick your fights and have ducks in a row.

[Football52]

1 hour ago, BADSANTA said:

Parquet can't play this year? That isn't cool at all. 

Look for him to suit up for Kelly.

[AggiesAreWe]

7 minutes ago, Football52 said:

Look for him to suit up for Kelly.

Doubt it.

[kingjames]

8 minutes ago, AggiesAreWe said:

Doubt it.

 

14 minutes ago, Football52 said:

Look for him to suit up for Kelly.

Probably passed the open enrollment time private school is very different

[winwin]

20 minutes ago, Football52 said:

Look for him to suit up for Kelly.

Too late for this season. Not to mention, any move they make now to any school would be an obvious basketball reason after the UIL decision. 

[Football52]

19 minutes ago, winwin said:

Too late for this season. Not to mention, any move they make now to any school would be an obvious basketball reason after the UIL decision. 

I was more thinking of a move to a private like we saw with Mayfield in football. I can't imagine a situation where the kid will just eat a year sitting out doing nothing.

[TxHoops]

I can't speak for his family but I don't think many who understand the process are surprised with the ruling on Parquet.  Most expected him to be on JV this year.  I applaud the decision on Carpenter though.  That move had zero to do with basketball. 

[winwin]

8 minutes ago, Football52 said:

I was more thinking of a move to a private like we saw with Mayfield in football. I can't imagine a situation where the kid will just eat a year sitting out doing nothing.

Even the private schools have restrictions about kids coming over for athletic purposes. The UIL decision is a red flag

[Football52]

2 minutes ago, winwin said:

Even the private schools have restrictions about kids coming over for athletic purposes. The UIL decision is a red flag

This must be a joke. Kelly has made a living off of kids "coming over for athletic purposes". It's so common that it's openly joked about on these boards. So you're telling me that if he tried to enroll today, he would be denied?

[ST413]

Those previous kids didnt have the earmark of being deemed ineligible by the UiL, did they.  Remember Mayfield was never a uil eligibility issue just a team rules issue.

[Mamba]

4 hours ago, AggiesAreWe said:

 

 

It' my understanding the Carpenter kid was ruled eligible, the Parquet kid ruled ineligible.

Couldve it have been for both brothers players A&B ?

[winwin]

11 minutes ago, Football52 said:

This must be a joke. Kelly has made a living off of kids "coming over for athletic purposes". It's so common that it's openly joked about on these boards. So you're telling me that if he tried to enroll today, he would be denied?

Every kid that has transferred to Kelly has had to have the previous participation form signed by the previous school stating that the move was not for athletic purposes. If he enrolled at Kelly today he would be accepted into the school. Being eligible to play Varsity sports would be up to TAPPS and you can bet the other schools in that District would be definitely protesting that

[Mamba]

16 minutes ago, Football52 said:

This must be a joke. Kelly has made a living off of kids "coming over for athletic purposes". It's so common that it's openly joked about on these boards. So you're telling me that if he tried to enroll today, he would be denied?

He has passed the deadline for certification i think thats what its called. Kids could leave low performing schools such as Ozen or Central and enroll in Kelly. In most cases most coaches wont check the boxes on the PAPF form unless the kid or parents are being well u know

[kingjames]

2 minutes ago, winwin said:

Every kid that has transferred to Kelly has had to have the previous participation form signed by the previous school stating that the move was not for athletic purposes. If he enrolled at Kelly today he would be accepted into the school. Being eligible to play Varsity sports would be up to TAPPS and you can bet the other schools in that District would be definitely protesting that

I agree with that. From my understanding its more kids going thru the same process.

[AggiesAreWe]

40 minutes ago, BlkMamba24 said:

Couldve it have been for both brothers players A&B ?

That's a possibility. But the post stated one was ruled eligible, the other ineligible. Can't see the older Parquet being ruled eligible and the younger ruled ineligible.