Jump to content

Herman's Texas Longhorns


UTfanatic

Recommended Posts

I'm aboard the Herman train too.  Look forward to seeing what he can do with this kind of talent.  And I hope Marvin Wilson is a fan because we had him with Strong, and could lose him to Bama without him. 

But can we now discuss the elephant in the room?  Does anyone else find the whole kissing his players thing with Herman a little weird?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, TxHoops said:

I'm aboard the Herman train too.  Look forward to seeing what he can do with this kind of talent.  And I hope Marvin Wilson is a fan because we had him with Strong, and could lose him to Bama without him. 

But can we now discuss the elephant in the room?  Does anyone else find the whole kissing his players thing with Herman a little weird?

Yes

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, TexazBall said:

I'll support him, hope he can bring these horns back to greatness..starting with good staff hires who can recruit the state and teach fundamentals as well as develop talent...

Hook'em 

All I Wanna see is our Special teams execute and Corners come down and press..lol if we can do that I know we've got better Jeez lol 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, TxHoops said:

I'm aboard the Herman train too.  Look forward to seeing what he can do with this kind of talent.  And I hope Marvin Wilson is a fan because we had him with Strong, and could lose him to Bama without him. 

But can we now discuss the elephant in the room?  Does anyone else find the whole kissing his players thing with Herman a little weird?

Well, he's in Austin now. Seeing him kissing his players will be the LEAST weird thing you see.

I am excited and ready to take this baby for a spin. HOOK'EM!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, UTfanatic said:

All ready reading about some recruits, some QB transfer named Allen, and a knockem dead staff. 

Word is that Kyle could graduate in 3 years and be a grad transfer and have 2 years to play immediately.  He could quit on his 2nd team in as many years.(it's a joke, I wish he would have stayed at A&M and I think he got screwed over last year)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

55 minutes ago, PhatMack19 said:

Word is that Kyle could graduate in 3 years and be a grad transfer and have 2 years to play immediately.  He could quit on his 2nd team in as many years.(it's a joke, I wish he would have stayed at A&M and I think he got screwed over last year)

2 years? Wow. That changes some things.

Still not sure I like kicking Buschele to the curb. Kid had an outstanding year, but hit a wall the last few weeks.

Bring on the competition I guess.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, Bandwagon Ranger said:

2 years? Wow. That changes some things.

Still not sure I like kicking Buschele to the curb. Kid had an outstanding year, but hit a wall the last few weeks.

Bring on the competition I guess.

If Herman comes in with his offense, both would probably not be as good of a fit like the incoming freshman from westlake Sam Ellienger(I think that's how you spell it) he would seem to be a better fit 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, TxHoops said:

I'm aboard the Herman train too.  Look forward to seeing what he can do with this kind of talent.  And I hope Marvin Wilson is a fan because we had him with Strong, and could lose him to Bama without him. 

But can we now discuss the elephant in the room?  Does anyone else find the whole kissing his players thing with Herman a little weird?

Asked the same question on another thread. Got mixed reviews. What happened to a pat on the rear? The only men I hugged were my grandfather, my dad, and my sons. Anyone else feels weird. Sure ain't gonna kiss them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

50 minutes ago, PhatMack19 said:

Van Malone and the SMU defense brought a lot of pressure....

Good one. Kind of like losing to Miss State? You know, a conference  game a highly ranked  team should not lose in November.  We shall defer to your vast experience in this area.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Member Statistics

    46,206
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    Ceb2000
    Newest Member
    Ceb2000
    Joined



  • Posts

    • Here’s a link to another story about it This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up
    • It’s behind a paywall but here’s Baytown Sun’s story on it.  It was reported on in other papers statewide so if you search by the date I think you’ll find other stories on it. UIL strengthens student transfer rules By Ron McDowell [email protected] Oct 18, 2024   In order to maintain a level playing field for all member schools, the University Interscholastic League strengthened rules regarding transfer student eligibility at its most recent meeting in Austin. Every year thousands of students transfer schools in the state of Texas. A student’s ability to participate in UIL sanctioned activities may be limited base on the reasons for the transfer. A change in family status, work transfers, enrollment in an academic magnet program, or a move across town, receive scrutiny, but only rarely does one of these reasons result in the loss of eligibility. The only reason to automatically cause the loss of participation eligibility is a transfer for athletic purposes. The current rule, which has been in place since 1981, does not require a Previous Athletic Participation Form (PAPFs) to be submitted if the student-athlete does not participate in a varsity level sport during the first year of enrollment. There has been growing concern among some member schools, that other members are breaking the current rule and creating “super teams” with new transfer enrollees, and that the UIL is not doing enough to police, what appear to be, the inordinate number of transfers among high school athletes. To mitigate these concerns, the UIL approved a proposal to expand the power of the State Executive Committee (SEC) and allow it to investigate schools based upon the number of PAPFs submitted. Schools that submit an inordinate number of PAPFs would face heightened scrutiny and possible public reprimand and future sanctions. The UIL has also changed the requirements for PAPF submission, mandating that the form be submitted before a grade 9-12 transfer student may participate at any level of school athletics. This is a marked departure from the current policy which encourages schools not to complete PAPFs for students who transfer in, if the school believes that the student will not play a varsity sport in the first year the student is enrolled at the new school. Some critics of the current system think that the change doesn’t go far enough. Speaking on background, one local school district source suggested that there should be an automatic year wait for transfer students due to the number of loopholes in the waiver process. “If a student transfers, it should be a year out of competition automatically,” the source said. In addition, the UIL also approved a proposal that gives the SEC the power to appoint an independent administrator to oversee the conduct of the local District Executive Committee (DEC) if it is determined that the DEC is not consistently enforcing the rules of the governing body. The change is significant since all appeals that a school brings, starts and usually ends with the DEC. That includes the determination of transfer student eligibility. It is believed that with the implementation of this change, schools in a UIL district will be less likely to face retribution from the DEC chair and other members. The policy changes will go into effect, Aug. 1, 2025 This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up  
    • I was hoping WOS was going to win. To get another chance to redeem ourself. Silsbee did not look good in that game and has not played consistent during the season. Hopefully against La Vega they will play 4quarters of football
    • This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up   GCCISD paid a firm called PASA to compile this report ahead of them closing/consolidating some schools and redrawing attendance zones.
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...