Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

First off, Trump has been doing that all along and got elected doing so. 

Even several Democrats are now calling for Nancy Pelosi to move aside as being irrelevant and being out of touch with the public. I find this funny as the Democrats nationwide and very much so in this forum, were spelling the doom of the Republican Party a couple of weeks ago. "What are you going to do after Hillary destroys Trump?" and other such dire predictions. Members of this forum predicted the end of conservatism and Republicans.

So my question is this. How did the darling of the liberal left, the heir apparent to Barack Obama, the claimed smartest woman in the world... lose the election? 

Now her supporters, who themselves have set the Democrats back several steps by not selecting a decent candidate, are now hanging on a few more losing votes being cast for her in her loss as a talking point. They are claiming that Trump is making crazy statements.... which is true and he has been doing it since day one. 

So Hillary won the popular vote by 2 million, 2.3 million or 4 million. She is also finished in politics and may have ended several other Democrats with her. As I watch some Democratic legislators say, we have found that we are out of touch with the public.

When a guy like Trump, who is not a good candidate, wins the elections, it is hard to argue with them. But of course, people in internet forums will continue to do so by worrying about what he tweets instead of taking a long look in the mirror. 

Posted
1 hour ago, tvc184 said:

First off, Trump has been doing that all along and got elected doing so. 

Even several Democrats are now calling for Nancy Pelosi to move aside as being irrelevant and being out of touch with the public. I find this funny as the Democrats nationwide and very much so in this forum, were spelling the doom of the Republican Party a couple of weeks ago. "What are you going to do after Hillary destroys Trump?" and other such dire predictions. Members of this forum predicted the end of conservatism and Republicans.

So my question is this. How did the darling of the liberal left, the heir apparent to Barack Obama, the claimed smartest woman in the world... lose the election? 

Now her supporters, who themselves have set the Democrats back several steps by not selecting a decent candidate, are now hanging on a few more losing votes being cast for her in her loss as a talking point. They are claiming that Trump is making crazy statements.... which is true and he has been doing it since day one. 

So Hillary won the popular vote by 2 million, 2.3 million or 4 million. She is also finished in politics and may have ended several other Democrats with her. As I watch some Democratic legislators say, we have found that we are out of touch with the public.

When a guy like Trump, who is not a good candidate, wins the elections, it is hard to argue with them. But of course, people in internet forums will continue to do so by worrying about what he tweets instead of taking a long look in the mirror. 

Shhhh...they're doing great.

Posted
22 minutes ago, Big girl said:

A president-elect should not be tweeting, especially about trival things. What would you think if President Obama constantly tweeted? This is unprofessional.

He is unprofessional, he is sometimes silly, he makes crazy statements and he beat the best the Democrats claimed that they could put up.

They say statistics are for losers such as we gained more yards in the football game but got beat 42-21. Hillary and her supporters proves that saying with an exclamation. 

The Dems are now scrambling after losing the Senate and House elections for four straight cycles. Keep on worrying about popular vote. The last three presidents have been in office for 8 years so you might have until 2024 to worry about your next viable candidate. 

Posted

The Dems still dont get this:  When the average family sits down at the dinner table, are they discussing how great it is to have transgender bathrooms and confederate flags removed or are they more likely to be concerned with what impact the slow growth economy is having on their personal situations and their ever increasing health care costs?  I know the answer but it would appear the left STILL does not. ( hint- Keith Ellison is not the solution)

Posted
55 minutes ago, Big girl said:

Hillary Clinton 

The choice of the people by 2.5 million+ votes

November 2016

There are 3,141 counties in the United States.

Trump won 3,084 of them.
Clinton won 57.

There are 62 counties in New York State.

Trump won 46 of them.
Clinton won 16.

Clinton won the popular vote by approx. 1.5 million votes.

In the 5 counties that encompass NYC, (Bronx, Brooklyn, Manhattan, Richmond & Queens) Clinton received well over 2 million more votes than Trump. (Clinton only won 4 of these counties; Trump won Richmond)

Therefore these 5 counties alone, more than accounted for Clinton winning the popular vote of the entire country.

These 5 counties comprise 319 square miles.
The United States is comprised of 3, 797,000 square miles.

When you have a country that encompasses almost 4 million square miles of territory, it would be ludicrous to even suggest that the vote of those who inhabit a mere 319 square miles should dictate the outcome of a national election.

Large, densely populated Democrat cities (NYC, Chicago, LA, etc) don’t and shouldn’t speak for the rest of our country.

Posted
10 hours ago, stevenash said:

There are 3,141 counties in the United States.

Trump won 3,084 of them.
Clinton won 57.

There are 62 counties in New York State.

Trump won 46 of them.
Clinton won 16.

Clinton won the popular vote by approx. 1.5 million votes.

In the 5 counties that encompass NYC, (Bronx, Brooklyn, Manhattan, Richmond & Queens) Clinton received well over 2 million more votes than Trump. (Clinton only won 4 of these counties; Trump won Richmond)

Therefore these 5 counties alone, more than accounted for Clinton winning the popular vote of the entire country.

These 5 counties comprise 319 square miles.
The United States is comprised of 3, 797,000 square miles.

When you have a country that encompasses almost 4 million square miles of territory, it would be ludicrous to even suggest that the vote of those who inhabit a mere 319 square miles should dictate the outcome of a national election.

Large, densely populated Democrat cities (NYC, Chicago, LA, etc) don’t and shouldn’t speak for the rest of our country.

Very good Nash, and to my knowledge, this is the reason for the electoral college.

Big Girl will simply say your source is unreliable.

Posted
1 hour ago, UTfanatic said:

Ms. Clinton will go down in history as the most corrupt member of the corruptest family to ever occupy the Whitehouse!!!

She makes Nixon look like the Pope.

 

I cannot agree with this.It is wrong and improper.

It is White House, not Whitehouse. 

Posted
On 11/30/2016 at 9:00 PM, Big girl said:

A president-elect should not be tweeting, especially about trival things. What would you think if President Obama constantly tweeted? This is unprofessional.

And the president should not be giving interviews to fat chicks in a milk bath eating cereal but he did!

Posted
14 hours ago, UTfanatic said:

Ms. Clinton will go down in history as the most corrupt member of the corruptest family to ever occupy the Whitehouse!!!

She makes Nixon look like the Pope.

 

if she's not the most corrupt, I don't even want to hear about who has been worse.  And even though Bill has the morals of an alley cat, at least it's a personal thing.  But Hillary, she sold out the whole country for her own financial gain.  Drop mic, grab alka seltzer.

Posted
On ‎11‎/‎30‎/‎2016 at 7:05 PM, tvc184 said:

First off, Trump has been doing that all along and got elected doing so. 

Even several Democrats are now calling for Nancy Pelosi to move aside as being irrelevant and being out of touch with the public. I find this funny as the Democrats nationwide and very much so in this forum, were spelling the doom of the Republican Party a couple of weeks ago. "What are you going to do after Hillary destroys Trump?" and other such dire predictions. Members of this forum predicted the end of conservatism and Republicans.

So my question is this. How did the darling of the liberal left, the heir apparent to Barack Obama, the claimed smartest woman in the world... lose the election? 

Now her supporters, who themselves have set the Democrats back several steps by not selecting a decent candidate, are now hanging on a few more losing votes being cast for her in her loss as a talking point. They are claiming that Trump is making crazy statements.... which is true and he has been doing it since day one. 

So Hillary won the popular vote by 2 million, 2.3 million or 4 million. She is also finished in politics and may have ended several other Democrats with her. As I watch some Democratic legislators say, we have found that we are out of touch with the public.

When a guy like Trump, who is not a good candidate, wins the elections, it is hard to argue with them. But of course, people in internet forums will continue to do so by worrying about what he tweets instead of taking a long look in the mirror

yep...been saying it for awhile.  Most people have a hard time with that.

people struggle with being honest to themselves and therefore cant be honest with the public

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Member Statistics

    46,282
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    Unknown472929300
    Newest Member
    Unknown472929300
    Joined


×
×
  • Create New...